In Bitcoin Pt 37. I said that the geometric diamond in the background geometry was an indicator of a full reversal. Sure looks to be that way.. but who knows.. make sure to come back for updates! Hit that like button if you like what ya see! :)
In order to validate my subjective belief (B) for Model T. I had to have the following occur for my belief to be true.
Model T must be validated with an Upper AND lower boundary statistical outlier. (Confirmed)
The upper boundary statistical outlier had to re-enter Model T. (Confirmed)
The end of the Diamond had to yield some intense price action (Confirmed)
We must initiate a criticality shift. (TBD..)
We must reach the Lower Boundary of the Master Operator in order for my ENTIRE modeling algorithm to be true. If we do not reach the Lower Boundary of the Master Operator. The algorithm will fail. But failure is just a means for growth of course. (TBD..)
To me this is for all the marbles.. I started this algorithm on 3.22.18.. The fact that it has gone this long.. well.. it changes things. Not here in the TA world per say.. but elsewhere in brain research that I am working on with neural network modeling.... :)
Thoughts..
I was worried there about Model T for a little bit.. I was thinking we have exited the upper boundary of Model T and we needed a re-entry but I was unsure if we would actually pull off the end of the diamond go into full supernova ready position..
This is full supernova ready position. In my subjective opinion of course. Hey i am probably wrong and that is OK. But what.. if...?
I guess we will see over the next few days ya?
I have 18,500 modeled for the high of the coming bull run followed by a step 86 degree back into oblivion. Heads will turn, people will cry.. It is going to happen very fast and violently. But of course i am most likely wrong.. But what if I am not.. I guess we shall see.
Review.
One thing you should understand is that what I am doing is new. It is Theoretical. Thus being it is theoretical, take it with a grain of salt.
I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes.
When rendering a model in my algorithm, the proposition that upholds the belief theory is subjective to a degree. I chose the best place I THINK it would go. Period. I follow the geometry as I see it in my eyes. That is subjective. No A.I. in crypyto trading has the ability to have subjectivity. But I do. No A.I algorithm created has subjectivity, unless it is a hybrid that incorporates HUMANS into it's analysis. The human operator is the most important aspect in understanding the real complex nature of human emotion and its interplay in something like crypto trading; as all bots programmed to trade (are based on emotions, and desires of the HUMAN programmer). Thus bots although automatic, ooze the emotional desires of the human programmer. An observable behavioral phenomena, to the train eyed.
The only way you can learn about my technique is to watch what i am doing. YOU WILL FIND THIS NOWHERE ELSE. As this is designed from scratch based off other research I am working on in my professional domain. This is a grand experiment, I thank you for all participating with me! Hit that like button, it lets me know you are watching like a ninja in the background!
If you are confused how i got here.. Please go back and look at my charts. They are sequentially marked by Pt's for easy identification.
As always thanks for looking,
Glitch420