Ethereum. P-Modeling Pt 9. Model E + The Master Operator
Updated
Welcome.. This is a huge update for Ethereum. Come back for updates! To understand how we got here please see previous charts separated by parts. This is part 9.
For awhile, we had the Evil Operator in control. (red line).
It really did not both us much in Ethereum.
The modeling sequence for this algorithm starts at A and goes to E. Model E is the newest Model rendered in the sequence.
April 12th I called for a switch to occur based on the geometry in my chart. The switch was to occur on May 12th. (See first few Pt's of Ethereum).
Today is May 13th and today our switch was initiated. The switch indicates a reversal here .. or the high probability for one.
Notice how the purple and red lines switch.
Ultra important.
Notice how we now have a battle zone projected between the new Strong Master Operator and the weak old evil operator.
All the geometry supports the new switch, the new master operator, and are subjective belief theory that is upholding our proposition.
Now i want you to look at the Master Operator.
The Master operator was birthed from lowest boundary intersect of rendered Models B, C, and D. (yellow line) + the Geo_operator intersect (purple) and.. The newest Master Operator Lower Boundary. The connect for that intersect birthed a new Master Operator. A very very STRONG operator.
But that old evil operator is right there.. it is very weak and has very little geometry to support it.. We are going to shift. Proposition stands at .89
Master Operator Sequence is now complete since we have a operator connect, operator intersect and both a lower and upper boundary of the operator.
This is going to be cataclysmic.. But I can be wrong.. no shame in being wrong at all. But i can also be right. Who really knows.. Lets see how it plays out.
Map:
Purple Lines: Master Operators foundation Matrix.
Light Blue Symbol: Master Operator.
Red Symbol: Evil Operator and sentry
Green/White lines: blast paths.
Red lines: resistant paths.
Review.
One thing you should understand is that what I am doing is new. It is Theoretical. Thus being it is theoretical, take it with a grain of salt.
I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes.
When rendering a model in my algorithm, the proposition that upholds the belief theory is subjective to a degree. I chose the best place I THINK it would go. Period. I follow the geometry as I see it in my eyes. That is subjective. No A.I. in crypyto trading has the ability to have subjectivity. But I do. No A.I algorithm created has subjectivity, unless it is a hybrid that incorporates HUMANS into it's analysis. The human operator is the most important aspect in understanding the real complex nature of human emotion and its interplay in something like crypto trading; as all bots programmed to trade (are based on emotions, and desires of the HUMAN programmer). Thus bots although automatic, ooze the emotional desires of the human programmer. An observable behavioral phenomena, to the train eyed.
The only way you can learn about my technique is to watch what i am doing. YOU WILL FIND THIS NOWHERE ELSE. As this is designed from scratch based off other research I am working on in my professional domain. This is a grand experiment, I thank you for all participating with me! Hit that like button, it lets me know you are watching like a ninja in the background!
If you are confused how i got here.. Please go back and look at my charts. They are sequentially marked by Pt's for easy identification.
As always thanks for looking,
Glitch420
For awhile, we had the Evil Operator in control. (red line).
It really did not both us much in Ethereum.
The modeling sequence for this algorithm starts at A and goes to E. Model E is the newest Model rendered in the sequence.
April 12th I called for a switch to occur based on the geometry in my chart. The switch was to occur on May 12th. (See first few Pt's of Ethereum).
Today is May 13th and today our switch was initiated. The switch indicates a reversal here .. or the high probability for one.
Notice how the purple and red lines switch.
Ultra important.
Notice how we now have a battle zone projected between the new Strong Master Operator and the weak old evil operator.
All the geometry supports the new switch, the new master operator, and are subjective belief theory that is upholding our proposition.
Now i want you to look at the Master Operator.
The Master operator was birthed from lowest boundary intersect of rendered Models B, C, and D. (yellow line) + the Geo_operator intersect (purple) and.. The newest Master Operator Lower Boundary. The connect for that intersect birthed a new Master Operator. A very very STRONG operator.
But that old evil operator is right there.. it is very weak and has very little geometry to support it.. We are going to shift. Proposition stands at .89
Master Operator Sequence is now complete since we have a operator connect, operator intersect and both a lower and upper boundary of the operator.
This is going to be cataclysmic.. But I can be wrong.. no shame in being wrong at all. But i can also be right. Who really knows.. Lets see how it plays out.
Map:
Purple Lines: Master Operators foundation Matrix.
Light Blue Symbol: Master Operator.
Red Symbol: Evil Operator and sentry
Green/White lines: blast paths.
Red lines: resistant paths.
Review.
One thing you should understand is that what I am doing is new. It is Theoretical. Thus being it is theoretical, take it with a grain of salt.
I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes.
When rendering a model in my algorithm, the proposition that upholds the belief theory is subjective to a degree. I chose the best place I THINK it would go. Period. I follow the geometry as I see it in my eyes. That is subjective. No A.I. in crypyto trading has the ability to have subjectivity. But I do. No A.I algorithm created has subjectivity, unless it is a hybrid that incorporates HUMANS into it's analysis. The human operator is the most important aspect in understanding the real complex nature of human emotion and its interplay in something like crypto trading; as all bots programmed to trade (are based on emotions, and desires of the HUMAN programmer). Thus bots although automatic, ooze the emotional desires of the human programmer. An observable behavioral phenomena, to the train eyed.
The only way you can learn about my technique is to watch what i am doing. YOU WILL FIND THIS NOWHERE ELSE. As this is designed from scratch based off other research I am working on in my professional domain. This is a grand experiment, I thank you for all participating with me! Hit that like button, it lets me know you are watching like a ninja in the background!
If you are confused how i got here.. Please go back and look at my charts. They are sequentially marked by Pt's for easy identification.
As always thanks for looking,
Glitch420
Note
A closer view of Model P. Note
5 Minute view of Model P.Note
Note
New idea coming very soon.. Note
Note
Related publications
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.