How to read a Chart - Part IV: Perspectives on PoIPoints of Interest
Introduction
One of the most common mistakes in trading ist the trading somewhat somewhere in the nowhere, which in general results in a bad trade location, wide stops, being stopped out very often or being right while being wrong.
Thus, in trading it is paramount to wait patiently for your setup to appear, and not every setup is of the same quality. Even though high quality setups are not appearing on a 1-minute-, 5-minute- or 60-minute-basis, waiting will actually not only save you money, but also result in higher profits, higher trading confidence and less stressful decision-making. Even if you’ve already heard of the basic principles, they are just right.
A. Highs and lows
As I’ve pointed out in my previous article “How to Read a Chart Pt. III”, the highs and lows on a daily chart are building the overall structure. Don’t get me wrong: the weekly has some nice perspectives too, but you should watch it if you are an investor going in for 10+ years. The highs and lows on a weekly chart still do have importance on lower time frames, but you shouldn’t make a decision on trading entries for a plus 5 years investment opportunity on a 1-minute- or even a 1-second chart. Why are highs and lows important? They are used as reference for past and thus future resistance. Does this always apply? No for sure, that's why structure is important. So before we’re diving deeper into this subject, let's have a quick comparison of weekly and daily highs and lows.
I’ve marked the high and low of the weekly chart in thick red, just to show that everything you might see on a weekly basis you're also able to see on a daily basis. In orange is the range of the past week and in blue the range of the current week.
So in general: if we’re trading above the previous week’s range, we are in general long biased, if we’re trading below the previous week’s range, we are short biased. Does this always apply? No! But when does this apply? When the big fishes, the “whales” are showing interest in selling or buying at those specific points. Something we can derive from the chart above is the following: the previous week’s low got rejected, but the value is shifting down; this means, that if we’re trading above the current week’s high there are two scenarios: either we’re going up fast, breaking the previous weeks high or we are being rejected and shifting down again - at least to the bottom of the range. If we're going below the low, it might go quick, fast and harsh.
B. High and low of the previous day
Applying this principle from chapter A to intra-day trading, it goes alike: in general, if we are trading above the previous day’s high, at large we are long and if we are trading below the low of the previous day, we are short. Let’s unfold this beauty of perspectivity:
In the picture above I’ve used a random high/low indicator - displaying the highs and lows of the previous day's session - as there are hundreds and hundreds to be found on @TradingView and the reason why is quite obviuos and well justified. I’ve also added “setups” to show you what to expect if you would have traded blindly every single break above the high or below the low. Even if you would have no specific view on the market, no bias or any idea of the markets direction you still would have made 4X (40 times your risk ! ) at win ratio of 56% - which most people would say is "not good".
C. Ranges
So what are the zones between a day's high and low? It's nothing else than the day's range. You may find ranges on bigger and smaller scales, on a 1 minute to 1 year time frame. What are these ranges? They are zones of congestion, zones of consolidation and zones of value, but mainly they are battlefields.
Let's have a look on a chart:
I've just plotted some of these zones to point out one thing: if you're trading within the zone, you're lost and you will most likely lose money even if you're right about the direction.
You need an edge in trading, and the easiest thing is to trade from one edge to the other edge until a breakout has been confirmed.
D. Big Bars / Big Fat Candles
Don't mistake me: this is not about day drinking, romantic candle light dinner or something like this; it is about big fat candles on a chart and what happened there and what is likely to happen. Some should note that a range on a lower time frame is nothing else than inside bars on a higher time frame. Usually a big fat candle appears if stops have been triggered and thus the sentiment has shifted. So, somewhere within this big fat candle there is support or resistance and it depends on volume and sentiment if we're about to move further in this direction or not, but mostly it is indicating momentum. If you want to trade pullbacks, you need to figure out where the breakout has happened; usually it has happened before the top or bottom of the corresponding range. Additionally, if a big fat candle got retraced to 100 percent, something is fishy, whilst a strong breakout should indicate only a partial retracement if the traders are committed to push prices further in their direction.
E. Value areas and Points of No Interest
As I'm using the free version of @TradingView , I would've attached an image from my order flow software, because there is no decent free volume profile indicator displaying value areas (if I'm wrong, post a link in the comments), but it seems that the image upload didn't work, but anyway. The point I'm trying to make ist this: value areas are showing zones where price is seen as fair and thus the most volume has been traded. If you're using a market profile (tpo or monkey bars), it is showing where price has been traded most of the time. Outside of this range, price is considered unfair, and this is - exactly as ranges overall - where your edge is.
Zooming out and seeing the bigger picture is extremely helpful to not get caught in war zones of higher time frames and big players.
On this chart above I'm using the 200 period volume profile of @LuxAlgo ,visually a beautiful piece of art. Furthermore, it is displaying somewhat similar to a value area and - even more interesting - the valleys in the profile, also called low volume nodes. To use these valleys as reference, you should not make the mistake and look where price has not been traded at all, but where supply and demand have diminished; this is blatantly simple: if there haven't been buyers or sellers at all, price will move on; so you need at least a certain threshold of trading activity.
In grey I've plotted the borders of the range. As you can see, as soon as the price has reached these areas, a reaction has happened. On the upside, it was a head fake, false breakout, emerging head and shoulders pattern or simply: no more buying interest. When price broke down you could have easily entered at the rejection or at the pullback.
Another zone of no interest is the light purple area, which has been established by big bars breaking through it and where one side has been swept. When price broke through and traded above, you could've used the pullback to go long (in the middle of the range though) or when it broke below to go short or to finally close your losing long position.
Quick cheat number 1 on applying support and resistance:
Switch to a line chart, check for the prominent highs and lows, switch back to candle or whatever your preference is and adjust (or don't ;) ).
3 different types of charts, all displaying the same. It is not perfect, it is not a pin point "you will always win and never lose" system, but markets consist of humans which aren't perfect either; and as long as machines are made by men, they aren't neither. And this is the reality of trading: nothing is a one-shot, a bullseye; nothing is perfect.
At last, there is more to trading than placing a limit order into a chart and get rich quick.
Quick cheat number 2 (that no one will tell you because it is too simple to sell it):
Look to the left! Markets have memories, because - and I'm repeating - markets consist of humans, and the only reference points others may use are not any calculations, extensions or fantastic AI structures: at the end it is all derived from history. How did price react at the last reference point? What happened next?
Let's quickly example this:
Think of it yourself: do you want to re-evaluate every tick hunting for signals on a vast amount of indicators or are you just keeping it simple (stupid)?
Key Takeaways
Don’t trade somewhere in nowhere!
Future price action depends on past action!
Switch your perspective if a change has become evident!
Trade less, earn more!
___
Note:
As I’m writing a book about reading a chart,
I am going to post a couple of short articles on this topic and others related to it, e.g. trend, volume , Dow theory, auction theory and behaviorism.
If you are spotting some errors or if you like to add something, feel free to comment or pm.
Cheers,
Constantine -
p.s.: This article is not intended as any kind of trading advice. If anything concerning this topic remains unclear, drop a message or a comment.
I've also linked a previous analysis of a trade where you can see a walk-through of the principles as described above
Behaviorism
How To Read a Chart Part III - Perspectives on TrendsDow - Elliott - Murphy
Introduction
As I am going deeper into the subject of reading a chart, we definitely need to cover trends. As the saying goes: “the trend is your friend”. But where does it start and where does it end?
In the following article I’m going to cover basic principles in use for more than a century.
Furthermore, the Dow theory is still in use by prop trading companies, hedge funds and banks. And the reason is quite simple: trade what you see.
A. Charles Dow and the Dow theory
Not being the first nor the last, one of the most popular perspectives on markets and the basis of all technical analysis is reaching back to Charles Dow in the late 19th century. Dow set up some simple rules to analyze markets and to follow trends.
First and foremost, the overall market discounts everything, which means that all available information is to be found within price. Additionally, the market renews itself within cycles, which is also the reason why the indices are always in a long bias, because the weakest companies get replaced by new strong and upcoming businesses. The market is, like the capitalist economy in general, moving in progression and regression. While old ideas - and therefore businesses and their models - are fading out, new ideas entering the circle of evolution. (If you want to know more about the psychological background, from a sociological background, check Max Weber’s The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism at shorturl.at or Franz Boas’ The social organization and the secret societies of the Kwakiutl Indians regarding the need of the renewing of economic cycles from a cultural point of view at shorturl.at).
Secondly, as stated, the market is built from two basic patterns - movement and correction. These patterns are expressed in a primary, secondary and tertiary trends, as plotted in the title image.
So we have to state that a trend is only existent if there is a move and a regression and a move exceeding the first top. Everything else remains interpretative!
Let’s have a quick look at a chart.
Above you’re seeing the BTCUSD from end 2019 ‘till mid 2020 on Bitfinance. In gray I’ve plotted moves that aren’t trends at all. I hereby repeat the obvious reason why:: a trend needs at least a higher high or a lower low from any starting point. But what’s within the plot above is just one high one low and something that might be called sideways.
The first time in this very long time period we’re having something that might be called a trend I’ve plotted in green, as you’re seeing below, even if it is not a “beauty”, neither close to perfect.
So let’s scale into the hourly and take a closer look.
I’ve set up the chart to close - which was one of Dow’s most sacred rules - and plotted the secondary downward trend in dotted red. This trend has shown signs to come to an end when a higher low has been made. But at this point the downward trend was still valid, even when the black line had been crossed. Why?
There are two rules for continuation and reversal:
In the case of a downtrend the latest high and the latest low are still valid, until they are confirmed by a new lower low OR the reversing trend has not only been broken (which is called a failure swing), but the new trend size is similar to the previous (non failure swing). The second case happened at point (3) and was confirmed at point (4) and (5) continuing higher (green dashed line).
I’ve also plotted a tertiary trend - red for down and green for up - in the following picture. This trend is also visible in the hourly chart and might be easier to visualize in the 10- or 15-minute chart. Also the fragility of the lower trend is visible. There are even more trends inside those three, but the smaller the trend the noisier the single moves and the more fractures are evident.
Overall, a trending push should be short in time, a regressive one long in time; a strong move might only be corrected by 33%, a mediocre one by 50% and a weak one by 66%, as a rule of thumb.
As another general rule, Charles Dow has been looking at different composite indices, and he discovered through close and steady observation, that one index ought to confirm the other; if not, there might be something “wrong” in the overall market conditions. The context of intermarket analysis was born.
B. Ralph N. Elliott and the Elliott Wave theory
Based on the Dow theory and the beautiful recurring cycles of growth in nature also known as Fibonacci numbers, Elliott came up with his theory of motive and corrective waves and their measurability, taking the Dow theory a step further and implementing a psychological approach. What does this mean?
Elliott supposed that - generally speaking - the beginning of a trend is not only marked by significant volume and rapid moves but also with heavy and steep corrections. And the reason is blatantly logical: As many traders are not yet convinced of a turn, they still sell or buy in direction of the previous one.Therefor, the so-called wave 1 is often corrected to a high degree or formed by widely overlapping price ranges (leading diagonal) as the overall market conditions are not clear yet. But when it is becoming obvious that the previous trend might have come to an end, new money is floating in and traders are jumping on board to profit from the new cycle. The hesitant and slow building up in volume and price movement is unleashing itself in an explosion. That’s why wave 3 and wave C are mostly longer than wave 1 and often indicated by unclosed gaps confirming trend strength as traders are jumping on the ongoing new trend.
As most traders are already positioned and new money doesn’t float in at the same pace, positions get slowly liquidated and the last traders, who are not positioned yet and are hoping for a late move and easy profits, are stepping in but fail to push strong enough. Consequently, wave 5 is usually shorter than wave 3, less impulsive, failing to make new highs or formed by overlapping prices (ending diagonal).
Again, we’re able to see this in any timeframe or any trend size, like on this 2 hour chart of USD/JPY below.
There are a bunch of rules, f.e. motive waves have to consist of 5 and corrective waves of 3 subsequent waves, but there are many, many more. Especially in Neo-Wave, the RSI is used to confirm the strength of a move. If you want to know more about this very specific subject, you may want to check out this very lovely made Elliott wave cheat sheet by @ArShevelev :
I’d like to add something that is ALWAYS missing in cheat sheets and overlooked by Elliott Wave analysts: The rules regarding price ranges are also to be taken into account for time ranges. The picture only unfolds itself if time and price and volume are analyzed to find opportunities, as Dow also took into account.
And even adding up to that, I’d like to quote an ingenious Elliott friend of mine: “If you are asking 10 different Elliott Wave specialists you’ll get at least 9 different analyses.”
And this is not the only obstacle in using Elliott Wave analysis.
C. John Murphy and technical analysis
As Elliott before him, Murphy added his very own personal perspective on the Dow theory. He expanded the approach of index confirmation to a whole intermarket analysis, using volume and plotting trend lines to indicate trend strength.
Exaggerated in the picture I’d just like to show - and here you should bear in mind that you can’t look into the future - that I don’t suggest trading trend lines. Which one would trade? Which one should you have taken? Are the other traders drawing the same trend lines or do they plot differently, maybe also due to different prices as in all markets usual, not only in ForEx, but especially in DEX, and also in stock markets, as I’ve covered in the previous chapter. Have you already been stopped out or are you still waiting for your entry for weeks, months or years?
As you may be successful trading trend lines, you still need to consider that those are very very subjective. You need to ask yourself this: Who is having the same analysis as I do? Maybe someone is looking at a different data feed as I’ve already mentioned, maybe someone else is looking at close only, maybe using Heiken Ashi, maybe, maybe, maybe. There are too many ifs and whens for my personal cup of trading.
If you like to get detailed information about Murphy’s approach, you can get his book here: amzn.to
At this point I wanted to quote something as “Trade what you see.” from Edwin Lefèvre’s tremendously entertaining book Reminiscence of a stock operator, but as I’ve started this article weeks ago, I forgot which phrase it was. Still you should read or listen to it (open.spotify.com)
In either way, all technical analysis is based on the same principle: higher prices, higher highs, higher interest, higher volume or vice versa. Don’t overcomplicate it, whatever your strategy might be and don't forget to take time into account, to estimate the proper trend sizes.
___
Note:
As I’m writing a book about reading a chart,
I am going to post a couple of short articles on this topic and others related to it, e.g. trend, volume , Dow theory, auction theory and behaviorism.
If you are spotting some errors or if you like to add something, feel free to comment or pm.
Cheers,
Constantine -
p.s.: This article is not intended as any kind of trading advice.
Thanks to all for reading and I hope it will help you in your analysis and your trading career.
Thank you all for the interest in my book and to answer your questions: there is no release date yet as it is still a work in progress and it will be an educational novel.
Cheers,
Constantine -
How to read a Chart - Part I: Perspectives on VolumePart I - Perspectives on Volume
A. Plain Volume
Introduction
As volume is the most important indicator on price and trend, it is often overlooked and more often not even used. But overall, volume is by far the easiest indicator of all, especially if used in conjunction with price and trend.
As many traders are relying on indicators, trying to ready something out of it - especially trend strength, possible turning points and divergences, exhaustion, breaks, flops, fall-outs, lagging trends and so forth can be seen on a blank chart.
Volume and Direction
Below you’ll see trending where price is following volume and vice versa (Fig. 1).
I’ve colored the volume in black, because too often the volume is colored on behalf of the close of the price range (candle or bar), which is confusing, irritating or even misleading.
As you see, I’ve taken a screenshot of the 15 minute time frame of NIO, but the following doesn*t rely on any specific stock, instrument or asset or any specific time frame; but as always you should take two things into account: the higher the time frame the more reliable and valuable the data and the lower the time frame the noisier the data but the closer the perspective and the earlier the possibility to (re-)act.
Below you’re seeing the same chart with slight annotations. The red arrow above the price bars is showing short selling or profit taking, while the red arrow above the volume is showing increasing volume. The green arrow below the price bars is showing rising interest and buying, while the green arrow above the volume is also signaling soaring interest.
In both cases, the volume is moving in the same direction as price and so this is considered to be a healthy move.
In contrast to the blue arrows above price and volume might be considered as diffident and reluctant buying. As the price is going up or even sideways, the concurring volume is vanishing and fading. According to this, the purple arrows are picturing a quite similar price action, but speaking in terms of selling.
This can be considered as profit taking, restructuring open positions and overall as a regressive move.
Why doesn't price go in one direction only? Why are these regressive moves occurring?
As especially the big trading floors, investment companies, hedge funds and the commercials are trying to get large slices of an asset, it takes time to get and to load up the desired amount. Think of it like this: If you are getting a new furniture like a table or a lamp, you`ll easily put it into the trunk of your car, but if you’re going to move from one flat to another, you’ll need a truck a certain period of time to load up or you’ll even need to drive a few times forth and back before everything is in its new place.
Trend strength
Based upon the former information we are now able to see the basic price moving in trend and regression, but sometimes - or even too often - the two aren’t trodding in the same direction. This is giving clues about the strength of an ongoing move as visualized by the orange arrows in the following figure and is usually easier to spot in upward than in downward movements (the reasons why, I am glad to explain in another chapter).
Divergences
As being one of the most favored tools of interpretation, divergences are also one of the most tremendous and even without any special tools to discover on a blank chart. We speak of divergence if the indication is showing another price direction as the chart itself is. In a regular point of view of the Dow Theory a trend is established by higher highs and higher lows, whilst a sheer price action divergence is considered to be the appearance of a lower high or a lower low in an uptrend and for a downtrend vice versa. A price/volume divergence is seen in the image below.
As marked by red circles, the consecutive higher highs aren't emphasized by increasing volume, rather the opposite is true: the volume of the subsequent high is at best at the same level as the precedent. This is considered classic divergences.
Volume peaks and lows
For the final part of volume basics on a naked chart, we need to have a look at volume spikes. To estimate move and direction properly, we need to ask where the spike has happened. If the previous move was up, the volume should also have risen to a certain extent to display the healthiness of the move. Usually, the peak of the blank volume is appearing on the end of a move, either up or down; therefore, a reversal might happen soon indicated by the red and green arrows in the figure hereinafter).
On the other hand, if a higher than usual volume is occuring at a resistance and breaking through, a future move seems likely.
But if the peak is happening within a range at no specific point of interest, then sellers or buyers most probably have cashed in and closed their positions.
When going for volume lows, it is quite easy: lows are usually appearing if there is no interest in buying or selling
B. Volume Delta and Cumulative Volume
Generally speaking, all of the analysis as written above might also be taken into account if looking at volume deltas. In the figure below. For this I’m using the “Simple CVD over MA” ( ) to exemplify the ease of use of volume; the settings are cumulative volume over previous bar, smoothed over the last 14 periods of the weekly time frame - displayed on the daily chart. Within this indicator, the asset is uptrending if the volume is above the zero line, and the histogram is colored green if the actual cumulative volume is higher than the previous.
This indicator, even if not very sophisticated, is visualizing the volume trend with a quick blink. The fading cumulative volume is indicating a regression until the valley has started to form (tagged in orange); furthermore, the histogram color is providing a good - or even the perfect - entry for a quick trade or a longer term swing; whilst the summits signaling a level for profit taking or a partial close of a position.
As a matter of fact, considering the upward sliding of the price just before the first green arrow whereas the volume is heavily fading, might also be regarded as divergence although they are easier to spot if either the calculated time frame or the ma period is set to a smaller value than used in the example.
Just bear in mind: As nothing in life is safe to a hundred percent, reading volume is stacking up the probabilities on your side.
___
Note:
As I’m writing a book about trading,
I am going to post a couple of short articles on topics like trend, volume, Dow theory, auction theory and behaviorism.
If you are spotting some errors or if you like to add something, feel free to comment or pm.
Cheers,
Constantine - co.n.g.
How to read a Chart - Part II: Perspectives on Price IWhat to look for
Introduction
As my previous post made unexpected waves within the community, I suppose you might be disappointed by this one,
but you should still take your time reading this article and take some time thinking about it.
Moreover, you might wonder, why the first article has been about volume instead of price or the chart itself and now it seems like we’re taking a step back.
To come straight to the point, volume is playing a decisive role in the feasibility of reading a chart.
Price is secondary, hence it is more important to know how price and therefore structure is built by trading activity.
The Cute and the Ugly I
During my trading education at a hedge fund, we held daily sessions to present trading ideas and charts.
The aim was simple: taking screen time, understanding price (action) and getting used to what to look for from a blatant technical perspective.
Only when we found what we were looking for, we dove into further research (which will not be covered in this article).
By looking at the hourly and daily chart of the Zoom Inc. I am exemplifying “beauty” and “readability” by comparing the data feeds
of two stock exchanges: the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores (BMV) and the Chicago Board Options Exchange (BZX, former BATS).
As the dailies might only differ slightly, there are quite a few visible fissures.
Those are getting even more evident if viewed on a lower time frame like the hourly.
The chart from the BMV stock exchange is riddled, perforated, and a riddle per se consisting of gaps,
flat and overly large candles than on anything providing clear and straightforward information.
Long story short, you should always use the data from the stock exchange with the most traded volume,
in general - not always - this ought to be the main stock exchange of the company’s country.
For assets like commodities, ForEx and similar, you should look at the futures’ charts whenever possible,
even - or especially - if you’re trading CFDs.
The Cute and the Ugly II
So now that you know which stock exchange to use the data from, how to choose a stock on a mere glance, rapidly, hundreds of stocks a day by manual screening?
To point this out, we’re having a look at the chart of the GameStop Corp.
Even though this stock was on everybody’s lips, the wicks and tails, the gaps, the (non-)existing patterns and the price action having formed this asset into a biest;
no hedge fund, no prop trading company neither a bank would take the risk on picking up positions, at least not on a short or mid term basis, not based on technical analysis.
In contrast to this, liquidity - and thus volume - is playing a key role in building price and structure
and consequent to this enhancing readability as you’re seeing in the chart of Crude Oil futures below.
What we've found
Now, you should slowly be able to see a chart and the price through the eyes of big investor, although you aren't one.
Big companies are not taking bets, not trading pink sheets for half a quarter cent;
they are stacking the odds in their favor by trying to avoid the unpredictable.
After reading this article, what would you prefer?
Making a small amount on a day-to-day basis or waiting years after years for the one chance to be rich in one shot?
As a colleague of mine once stated: As traders, we're positioning ourselves to make money continuously to then catch a bigger move.
___
Note:
As I’m writing a book about reading a chart,
I am going to post a couple of short articles on this topic and others related to it, e.g. trend, volume, Dow theory, auction theory and behaviorism.
If you are spotting some errors or if you like to add something, feel free to comment or pm.
Cheers,
Constantine -
p.s.: This article is not intended as any kind of trading advice.
I didn’t expect that my previous article made that much waves. Thanks to all for reading and I hope it will help you in your analysis and your trading career.
Thank you all for the interest in my book and to answer your questions: there is no release date yet as it is still a work in progress and it will be an educational novel.