XRP Short Term Reaccumulation Period Likely Happening So, as we are finally in an orbit with our XRP rocket, we might could expect some reaccumulation happening before continuing our journey to the moon. The pattern that has formed as we broken through our blue resistence line (now support), tels me that we could repeat Nov- Dec 2020 price action, minus the dramatic price fall of course. We have to understand that XRP price would already be between $1 - $2 area if sec lawsuit wouldn't happen in Dec, nevertheless here we are waiting for the tears of joy to come.
No one knows how long this reaccumulation period could take, but a think it will happen quicker than it did in dec. as we've already broken through a 2year old resistence line (blue)
The reaccumulation pattern could happen differently than it is shown on the graph, as there are many new people in the space than there was in 4-5 months ago. Whatever it happens i still think that this blue support line will get backtested, but don't take my word for it.
I am not a financial advisor so and nothing here should be taken as a financial advise. Stay safe with your investments.
BITSTAMP:XRPUSD
Lawsuit
XRP We Might Even Go ParabolicAfter we break above blue resistence line from where we got rejected two time already. At that point I honestly believe we could just go parabolic after a complete brake through and maybe a retest of that line. It is a pure speculation but we have to take such price movements into a consideration as XRP price is well undervalued for more than 3 months now.
All the weak hands are shaken out at this point, also sec lawsuit has been much more explained in detail by now, that it does not effect current xrp sales, only sales of xrp that have been done by Ripple between 2012-13 so that is another reason why go parabolic in the next few days/weeks as exchanges will start to relist it.
Price could react as it reaches to 0.618 and 0.786 fib. retracement level, which could get back tested once again.
I am not a financial advisor so don't buy anything that a say.
BITSTAMP:XRPUSD
SEC vs. $XRP - A price action timeline (March 19th)Price of XRP in relation to news about SEC lawsuit.
In this chart I will be plotting some of the major news stories regarding the SEC lawsuit against Ripple in hopes of getting a better understanding of how this lawsuits affects the price in the long run. I'm aware that there's more news concerning Ripple ($XRP) outside of the SEC lawsuit and I'll try to add those articles that caused major price action, but for the time being I think it'll be more clear to stick to SEC vs. Ripple news. I will be expanding this idea whenever major news regarding the SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit is available.
📈Technicals
Fibonacci: XRP is trading just under the 0.5 retracement level.
RSI: Moving sideways at 52.52
MACD: Crossed over yesterday on the daily chart, closing above today will confirm cross-over.
Key S/R levels:
0.52155 - Strong resistance (0.618 fib)
0.48719 - Nearest resistance (0.500 fib)
0.44312 - Nearest support (long term trendline)
0.41830 - Stronger support (0.236 fib)
0.36500 - Lower support (0.000 fib)
▶Current Patterns
XRP price is currently in the middle of a symmetrical triangle nearing the apex (converging on March 28th).
Breakout price movement = (triangle top)-(triangle bottom) = 0.65028 - 0.36500 = 0.28528
Breakout TP : ~0.4610 + 0.28528 = 0.74628
Breakdown TP : ~0.4610 - 0.28528 = 0.17572
📰Latest top stories:
Ripple vs. SEC court grants motions to dismiss and strike sets schedule.
Ripple expands in asia despite SEC lawsuit increasing odds for a 60% breakout.
Judge declines xrp investors attempt to become third party defendants in SEC case.
💖💖 If this chart gave you some insights or saved you some time, please consider donating . 💖💖
XRP: rHeyDwwhfHmAeg44gHeKNTRam8KLBQnqdy
ADA: addr1qxfrnkcp76re8apqs08r4de0563pajlsrj3yzq4f57nwmusd22psc2da45vkhn2apttaz89ym6rkchprur238k43xl5sldhkw8
DOGE: DKdp5cRSJi5DEkfxJai48GigZPFtBk8vK2
WINk: TVbwZzvxg7ozrAs4jT2FHpshGwMHxvGnoF
(Keeping this chart updated requires a lot of research, work and coffee. If you spot any news I've missed, feel free to DM me or comment below)
❗Disclaimer❗
I am no financial advisor, I merely maintain this chart for my private - and for the public - education and entertainment.
Do not take any of this as financial advice and always DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.
SEC vs. $XRP - A price action timeline (March 16th)Price of XRP in relation to news about SEC lawsuit
In this chart I will be plotting some of the major news stories regarding the SEC lawsuit against Ripple in hopes of getting a better understanding of how this lawsuits affects the price in the long run. I'm aware that there's more news concerning Ripple ($XRP) outside of the SEC lawsuit and I'll try to add those articles that caused major price action, but for the time being I think it'll be more clear to stick to SEC vs. Ripple news. I will be expanding this idea whenever major news regarding the SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit is available.
Technical Analysis
Fibonacci: ↘ XRP briefly touched the 0.618 ceiling earlier this day and is currently retracing back to the 0.500 line.
RSI: ↗ Currently moving upwards at 52.67
MACD: 🔀 Signaling a cross-over on the daily chart
Key levels:
0.52636 - Strong resistance
0.49718 - Nearest resistance
0.46962 - Nearest support
0.43762 - Stronger support
0.42723 - Lower support (long term trend line)
Todays top stories:
www.crypto-news-flash.com
bitcoinexchangeguide.com
www.financemagnates.com
Any donations will keep me motivated to expand this overview!
Donate me a ☕ at XRP wallet address: rG8WkRMcpwkRGsmy8mDiygNAiCar5M4SoT
SEC vs XRP Sparks Will Fly A title with two meanings.
Sparks will fly when the SEC makes their move with at least some knowledge of the lawsuit on Feb 22. Maybe a resolution but I'm certainly not holding my breath. The sparks will come from price exploding in reaction to whatever is learned. The outcome could be bearish or bullish.
The second meaning refers to the literal Spark tokens that will soon begin "flying" to thousands of wallets all around the world.
Short term volatility is guaranteed.
My long term outlook is this... you can answer the questions for yourself...
XRP = Bankers Coin
Bankers run the world. (they really do its not my opinion, look deeper if you have doubts)
CBDC's (central bank digital currencies) are coming.
Fiat needs a fix, quantitative easing loosing its ability to dictate fiscal policy.
Digital money will only increase in popularity, there will be winners and losers.
Betting against it would be like writing off the internet in 1998.
What is all this noise of real time payments? They are suddenly a frequent talking point.
Beyond a talking point there are actual major issues with the outdated financial infrastructure. (on a global scale mind you)
Who is out front and center stage in attempts to solve that issue through blockchain technology?
Have they just begun their work or been at it for years?
What is their proximity to global government bodies that are calling for a new Bretton Woods Agreement?
XRP coiling up for one of the greatest bitch slaps the doubters of humanity have ever seen.
When you are born and live in a world order guided by direction and long term planning.
Don't bet against the house.
Not. Financial. Advice.
XRP/Tether weekly bullish expectationHI
if you had followed the news regarding this crypto you might have heard the news that the SEC had slapped a case against the company and this crypto as it is not a currency and it is a security by its nature,
the reasoning was that at first glance it is not a decentralize coin and it is a centralize token where the company which uses it for financial transactions are holding the majority of it release and controlling its flow directly to the market so does the Security and Exchange Commissions took the objections based on its influence able nature and as of now the CEO and CLO of the company are tackling the lawsuit in the court so if they come up with acquisition from case so does another pump in the daily volume and value of the asset...
please comment me your views
Short from these levels is a decent ideaXRP is facing delistings and trading suspensions as a result of an American lawsuit. This is why overall sentiment is bearish but I do not expect it to shatter XRP over long term. It is higly advantageous blockchain for the banks. They won't give it up, they may give up the US customers though. Anyway, the technicals say the blue level should be good for opening shorts.
Ok, Stop"Anotha One..." Micro timeframe Dolphin! Long or Short ? Who cares it's inverted .. Hey Ripple Army thanks for the move down it was really rewarding. Is this Dolphin already up for another show?
What are your thoughts? What is XRP good for???
-No advice just thoughts that I can't shake after the last 5 years in the world of "CRYPTO"
""KEEP CALM AND MANAGE THY RISK!""
P.S. Remember if you plan on hand-feeding the Dolphins please keep in mind Dolphins have teeth.
A simple consideration on XRPI was a 4 year XRP holder before selling since SEC sued Ripple, I didn't sell for any reason (I also was unexperienced back then) and I regret it. Before going further I've to say that despite all the hate around this coin I love XRP because it's a good project, it's fast and easy to predict which makes it a good profit source, you just don't have to marry the coin like I wrongly did for so much time. I also have to say I don't care about coin projects, I think very few will be used in the future, the rest are just things on which we invest with the only purpose to make money.
CURRENT SITUATION AND RISK: if you're reading this and you didn't sell before it's clearly too late to sell so I'm not gonna say "save what you can and let the ship sinks" because it'll be a bad advice. I think XRP have reached a strong support level on which bounced already, in order to break downward it'll take worse news than "SEC sued ripple" because that one has already exhausted its dumping effect. So, I think that in the short period there are no risk XRP will dump toward the 0.13$ support.
FUTURE ACTIONS I don't know how much this lawsuit will take to be over, anyway in my opinion there are two cases scenario here:
1) SEC wins the lawsuit: in this case Ripple is over but this is a good occasion to short sell XRP. In case you'll be into XRP in loss and SEC will win I would sell even at loss in order to avoid a larger loss;
2) in XRP wins I'd suggest you all to jump in ASAP because it'll skyrocket and probably break 3 resistances in no time.
Both cases justify whoever decided to sell before the collapse since with the money obtained they can go either way at the end of this story.
Heads up!So, I won't do this a third time but for the XRP Moon BoyZ out there we could possibly have a fourth Dolphin ; however in my experience Dolphins often don't stay in the air forever! Keep your raincoat near by I think your in the SPLASH ZONE ! LOL
Well at the moment glad I went short at .65 IDK really after all this..
What are your thoughts? What is XRP good for???
-No advice just thoughts that I can't shake after the last 5 years in the world of "CRYPTO"
""KEEP CALM AND MANAGE THY RISK!""
XRP Lawsuit Gives 2nd Chance For Major GainsMy Fellow Crypto Traders,
Appreciate you taking the time to view my analysis which I hope you may find beneficial. Please be sure to “LIKE” if you indeed find my analysis useful and/or find my analysis intriguing.
Cheers & Happy Trading!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANALYSIS:
XRP is looking to test the 200EMA in which would be a great buying opportunity for long term holders to re-up on more XRP. As we all know XRP is not a security, the SEC lawsuit has no ground to fall back on to see success. Therefore, in the short term, this correction should be short-lived and should see some nice positive price action in the intermediate to long term.
EOS.IO ($EOS) ♢ | Does Block.one Have The Bears Under Control?1️⃣ Despite a lawsuit against Block.one for EOS token sales, EOSUSDT and EOSBTC charts are both showing strength. While the broader market is consolidating, the trend of the general market is still bullish. Given the trend of EOS and crypto as a whole, it makes sense to map out some support levels to try to get a long position in this range.
Support:
First up we have the S1 bullish S/R flip and orderblock cluster. We expect price to find support here in the short term. S1 should make a good entry for a retest of the previous range. If S1 doesn't hold, the S2 cluster and trend line should work to hold up the price, although this does create more potential for continuation to the downside. With that said, we don't see S2 being breached unless we see a correction in the broader market (unless perhaps that lawsuit news ramps up; see the link below).
Resistance:
First up, we have the local resistance at the bottom of the previous range where we expect to find rejection. Next, we have R1 which could act as a target for any trades taken at S1 or S2. Above that we have the R2 and R3 orderblocks which are both notable levels to look for reactions if price continues the uptrend.
Summary:
EOS is in an uptrend and so is the broader market, so the goal here is to look for support levels for potential long entries despite us likely being in a consolidation range for the time being (much like the broader market). While we aren't taking a long position here ourselves due to the lack of momentum present in the current chart, these levels are all noteworthy for the EOS bulls.
Resources: www.globenewswire.com
✨ Drop a comment asking for an update, we do NEW setups every day! ✨
Like, Comment & Follow to help the community grow 🎉🎉
LEAF - Boston Globe News - Feds Lawsuit - Short? Thoughts?Hard to short sell here, but as of 30 minutes ago.. Let me know the impacts/your thoughts? Looks like news hasn't hit major stock news outlets yet.
Post comments.
About stock: www.marketwatch.com
www.ftc.gov
www.bostonglobe.com
IT IS TIME TO SHORT $ZMContextual immersion trading strategy idea.
Zoom Video Communications, Inc. provides a video-first communications platform in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
Shareholder rights law firm Johnson Fistel, LLP reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Zoom Video Communications — finance.yahoo.com
Zoom made materially false and misleading statements about privacy of zoom-conferences etc.
The demand for shares of the company looks lower than the supply.
This and other conditions can cause a fall in the share price in the next days.
I had opened a long position three times, but everything had changed.
So I opened a short position from $135,4;
stop-loss — $143,80.
Information about take-profits will be later.
Do not view this idea as a recommendation for trading or investing. It is published only to introduce my own vision.
Always do your own analysis before making deals. When you use any materials, do not rely on blind trust.
You should remember that isolated deals do not give systematic profit, so trade/invest using a developed strategy.
If you like my content, you can subscribe to the news and receive my fresh ideas.
Thanks for being with me!
$VALE Short after Dam Collapse Disaster "Short as Fuck"!!!...$VALE Short after Dam Collapse Disaster...!!!
$VALE is at it again!
This time its much worse
Hundreds Dead
Hundreds Injured & Missing
Environmental Disaster of Epic Magnitude
Vale Has Suspended Dividends
Suspended Executive Bonuses
4 New Downgrades
38.50% Insider Owned
20.40% Institutional Owned
10% of the Total Shares Outstanding Have Rolled Over by Lunch Today, 56M Shares Traded out of 5.7B Outstanding...ohhhh yea baby!
I'm getting SHORT as fuck! Vale could drop as low as 2016 levels around the $2 mark! Excellent short opportunity! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck! Loading up on Puts! Getting Short as Fuck!
!!!See you guys at the bottom!!!
Bento Rodrigues Dam Disaster
The Bento Rodrigues dam disaster occurred on 5 November 2015, when an iron ore tailings dam in Mariana, Minas Gerais, Brazil, suffered a catastrophic failure, resulting in flooding that destroyed the village of Bento Rodrigues and killed 19 people. The failure of the Bento Rodrigues dam has been described as the worst environmental disaster in Brazil's history. Around 60 million cubic meters of iron waste flowed into the Doce River, causing toxic brown mudflows to pollute the river and beaches near the mouth when they reached the Atlantic Ocean 17 days later. The disaster sparked a humanitarian crisis as hundreds were displaced and cities along the Doce River suffered water shortages. The total impact of the disaster, including the reason for failure and the environmental consequences, are officially under investigation and currently still unclear. The owner of the Bento Rodrigues dam, Samarco, was subject to extensive litigation and government sanctions. In 2016, charges of homicide were filed against 21 executives of Vale and BHP Billiton, the companies that own Samarco as a joint venture. Controversy over the investigation grew after a 2013 report, indicating structural issues in the dam, was leaked.
Background
The Fundão and Santarém tailings dams were constructed and owned by Samarco Mineração SA, a mining company, in Mariana, a municipality 67 kilometers (42 mi) south-east of Belo Horizonte, in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
The tailings dams were built by Samarco to accommodate the waste resulting from the extraction of iron ore taken from extensive Germano mine, located in the Mariana district of Santa Rita Durão. The Fundão dam was constructed in the hills near the village and subdistrict of Bento Rodrigues, located 14 kilometers (8.7 mi) north of Mariana city.
Incident
At approximately 3:30pm on 5 November 2015, the Fundão dam presented a leak. Immediately, a team of outsourced employees was sent to the scene, and they tried to mitigate the leak by deflating part of the reservoir. At around 4:20pm, a rupture occurred, releasing a large volume of toxic sludge into the Santarém river valley. Bento Rodrigues, which lies 2.5 kilometers (1.6 mi) away in the valley below the dam, was almost entirely flooded by the cascade of toxic water and mud. Other villages and districts in the Gualaxo river valley, also in the region of Mariana, suffered minor damage. Bento Rodrigues is only accessible by unpaved back roads. The incident rendered Bento Rodrigues completely inaccessible by road, hindering firefighters' rescue efforts. The only available method of transport into or out of the location was via helicopter. There was a school in the area where the flood occurred, and the teachers were able to remove the students before school. Samarco and the neighboring communities did not have a contingency plan or evacuation routes in the event of dam failure. Had such plans existed, residents may have been able to evacuate in a timely manner to more secure regions. Around 600 people were evacuated to Mariana, and troops of the Brazilian Armed Forces were deployed to assist.
Impact
Satellite images of Bento Rodrigues and the Germano mine before and after the disaster, displaying the flooding and pollution of the Doce River. An abandoned car caught in the mudslide amidst the ruins of Bento Rodrigues. Satellite image of the mouth of the Doce River in Linhares, Espírito Santo, when tailings reached the southern Atlantic Ocean. According to a United Nations report, the tailing slurry traveled 620 km downriver, eventually reaching the Atlantic Ocean. Nineteen people were killed, "Entire fish populations – at least 11 tons – were killed immediately when the slurry buried them or clogged their gills", and "the force of the mudflow destroyed 1 469 hectares of riparian forest."
Contamination of Rio Doce
At around 6:30pm on the day of 5 November, the tailings of iron ore reached the Rio Doce. The river basin has a drainage area of about 86,715 square kilometers, with 86% in Minas Gerais and Espírito Santo. In total, the river covers 230 municipalities that use its bed for subsistence. According to biologist and ecologist Andrew Ruschi, who studies marine biology at the Estação Biologia Marinha Augusto Ruschi in Santa Cruz, Espírito Santo, the waste will take at least decades to dilute to levels anywhere near previous levels. The waste also reached the hydroelectric power plant of Risoleta Neves in Santa Cruz do Escalvado within 100 kilometers of Mariana. According to the company that runs the power plant, its functioning has not been affected. On 9 November, the city of Governador Valadares stopped the water intakes due to the mud on the Rio Doce. The next day, a State of Public Calamity was decreed in response to the water shortage in the city. According to analyses carried out in the city, the mud contains greater than acceptable concentrations of heavy metals, substances harmful to health, such as arsenic, lead and mercury.
There are concerns about contamination of the nearby Rio Gualaxo do Norte , a tributary of the Doce River, due to the toxic substances stored at the facility.
Contamination of southern Atlantic ocean
On 22 November, the waste reached the Atlantic Ocean. The toxic mud is spreading across the Espírito Santo coast, where cities closed down access to beaches. On 7 January 2016, the waste reached the southern Bahia littoral zone. Environmentalists who are monitoring the impact to the Abrolhos Marine National Park wildlife. The park is considered of vital importance to the Brazilian ecosystem since it hosts the greatest marine biodiversity in the whole southern Atlantic ocean.
Aftermath & Investigation of the causes
On the first quarter of November 2015, the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies and the state chambers of Minas Gerais and Espírito Santo each created a special commission to follow the case, and the actions taken. According to the press, many of the deputies that composed such commissions had received donations from Vale to finance their campaigns. Such donations, summing up to R$2.6 million are legal, and were reported by the then-candidates to the Brazilian Election Justice. However, critics argued that the deputies' participation was clearly biased. In January 2016, the leaking of internal documents from 14 months before the disaster revealed that Samarco had been warned about the possibility of the dam collapses. Joaquim Pimenta de Ávila, an engineer who was regarded as one of the foremost tailing dam engineers in Brazil, had been contracted by Samarco between 2008 and 2012 to design and oversee the construction of the Fundão dam. From 2013, Ávila was hired part-time as a consultant to inspect the dam, and a technical report he wrote from September 2014 lists severe structural problems on the dam (in the form of cracks) and measures to mitigate them, the main one being the construction of a buttress. Samarco claimed to have implemented all the recommendations from Ávila, and that the dam was in the process of being heightened when the landfill reached its maximum holding capacity and began to leak. However, Samarco failed to comment specifically about the buttress, and claims that it was never warned about the severity of the structural damages, nor about the imminence of a catastrophic failure.
Sanctions to Samarco
Samarco president Ricardo Vescovi & The Minas Gerais government suspended Samarco's activities immediately after the disaster. Next, the Brazilian government fined Samarco R$250 million (USD$66.3million) for the incident. The fine was preliminary and was expected to be increased if the two companies were found guilty of water pollution and damages. In January 2016, the Brazilian government and Samarco reached an agreement and a fine of R$20 billion (USD$4.8 billion) was issued. The penalty did not include compensation to people affected by the disaster, and the cost of recovering the polluted area. By July 2016, BHP had provisioned USD$2.3-2.5 billion for costs associated with the compensation deal being struck between Samarco's shareholders (BHP and Vale) and Brazilian federal, state and municipal authorities.
Legal consequences
Vale and BHP Billiton own Samarco as a joint venture, with each company possessing a 50% stake. As of 2018, these companies remain in negotiations with Brazilian authorities in efforts to settle out of court. In March 2016, Samarco agreed to pay USD$2.3 billion in compensation. Australia's ABC reported that Samarco and its joint venture partners would "establish a foundation to develop and execute environmental and socio-economic programs to restore the environment, local communities and social conditions of the affected areas." In June 2016, an AUD$8 billion civil suit which was reinstated by Brazil's Superior Court after the original agreement was suspended. BHP, along with its Samarco joint venture partner Vale, face a separate $58 billion suit lodged by federal prosecutors. In October 2016 it was reported that Brazilian prosecutors had filed manslaughter and environmental charges against 21 people including top executives of Samarco's owners: BHP Billiton, an Anglo-Australian multinational mining, metals and petroleum company headquartered in Melbourne, Australia and the world's largest mining company, and Vale SA, the third-largest mining company in the world and the Public Eye People's Worst Company award winner of 2012. In June 2018, Samarco, Vale and BHP signed a deal to drop a $7 billion lawsuit and allow two years for the companies to address the greater $58 billion suit seeking social, environmental and economic compensation.
Class action suits
In August 2018, BHP settled a class action suit in the USA for USD$50 million, with no admission of liability. At the same time, it was facing a class action suit in Australia related to the dam failure and losses incurred by shareholders following company disclosures to the market regarding the safety of the dam. The class action is expected to be one of the largest in Australian history, with 30,000 BHP shareholders involved, with a combined shareholding of 330,000 shares, valued at over AUD$10 billion (as of 5 November 2018). On 5 November 2018, SPG Law, a Liverpool-based law firm, issued a class action against the BHP Group for £5 billion, one of the largest in British legal history.
Class-Action lawsuit 'potentially' may make this sky-rocket.Lawsuit via BARNA, soon to be issued starting April 9th, claims that $CALI has 35x times the current assets NOT kept with the company.
If the lawsuit wins there's a potential upside that $CALI goes to $102's / $103's per share.
If there's a settlement, then say 50% of this, then $CALI is in $50's
EITHER WAY, it's up.
And from 2016 --> 2018, $PT goes up yet Market Cap goes down? Where did the money disappear to?
This is why there's a class-action lawsuit happening.
Blackberry's lawsuit agaginst Facebook, possible game changer.Blackberry has just announced that they are going to be suing Facebook group. Yes, that's right. Suing Facebook for patent infringements. To even file the claim, their lawyers must have a pretty good basis to even try and take on such a massive group, which they mention in the article below. If Blackberry wins this lawsuit , This could possibly be the biggest tech company recovery since Apple. With the valuation of those enterprises in the 10's of billions, I'm extremely curious as to what type of financial compensation we are talking about here, and what this will do for TSX:BB long term.
www.wsj.com
DEUTSCHE BANK - technical analysisAfter the tough time, Deutsche Bank had last year, facing a U.S. lawsuit (...), the stock is finally recovering and we are likely to see a strong appreciation in value during 2017. As the price development suggest, Deutsche Banks's stock price usually follows trendlines for a fairly long time. Moreover, price movements most of the time follow a linear function and therefore do not change their direction very quickly, relative to the percentage of price change. Considering these two specific patterns of behavior, the current situation indicates that the price is going to move along with the ascending trendline below, towards the crossing point with the higher descending trendline. From there on, due to the restructuring over the last year and the in-depth change in strategy, cutting costs, reducing risk and focusing more on major clients, at Deutsche Bank, the odds for a breakout above the descending trendline and a continuing upwards movement are pretty good.