I entered this spot long trade at .006, and just added more to my position at .12 after bouncing well off support around .010 Volatility is wild on this as it is a microcap coin, but the dev is brilliant and the co-founder of Solana has been retweeting him and the project OpenSVMAI. I think this will have wild swings but it is worth entering in a spot long trade...
While alts and Solana memes have been taking a beating, there's still great opportunity to trade these. I find sticking with spot is the safest and if you look at something like Myro, which essentially moves in tandem with WIF, it's a relatively easy trade at moments like this when it's been bouncing at support. I've re-entered at .083 and intend to hold this...
If we're looking at the Solana meme coin space, Myro tends to move a bit behind WIF. Currently Myro has been in a slow but steady recovery, establishing higher levels of support. If we look at the charts and history, we're in the almost exact formation WIF was on January 8th price point wise and chart structure - also similar to where Myro was before it's...
Some slight adjustments to my previous post - Myro actually moved on a much faster timeframe than I anticipated and it's pivot points were slightly higher. Today we say a solid consolidation after hitting .16, and then a swift 20% drop across crypto that was quickly bought back - this shook out a lot of leverage on both sides and has primed Myro among other coins...
Updating my analysis from .076 to .30, which was pretty spot on though MYRO moved on a much faster scale than I anticipated. Using the same analysis looking at WIF, which Myro has always followed closely behind and is on the same blockchain of Solana, we can expect similar movement now that it has broken out from it's previous peak ATH of .26, made a new ATH and...
MYRO has always trailed about a month behind WIF's trajectory and price. My earlier analysis from MYRO's second breakout on February 27th was almost spot on, and then my second analysis from March 3rd on the .30 target was also accurate, if not underestimating the rate at which it climbed well past the target. Now this is amending my latest analysis which...