Be traders, calm and detached. But don't be fanatics! A small note designed to add peace of mind so that you can take your profits on time and not succumb to the general hype.
RESULT OF THE FIRST CRYPTOCURRENCY REVOLUTION.
While cryptomaniacs rejoice at the Bitcoin pump and wait for the approval of the Bitcoin ETF so that large funds can sell rich hamsters digital gold at a decent profit for themselves, it is worth considering the outcome of the first phase of the cryptocurrency revolution in order not to succumb to the general positivity and hype of crypto hamsters.
Let's start with the very basics: in what cases do you need cryptocurrency and blockchain?
1. If you need to organize a project, the organizer and leader of which may be a fraudster. If the project is run by honest people and they follow the laws, then neither blockchain nor cryptocurrency is needed.
2. If you need to give potential fraudsters the opportunity to use blockchain and cryptocurrency, but so that their attempts to steal or seize control are blocked by blockchain technology.
3. If it is necessary to enable the transfer of conditional digital values from one user to another, contrary to government prohibitions. For example, a USDT transfer that will be blocked by banks or regulated payment networks.
In all other cases, there is no point in blockchain.
Have the current blockchains and cryptocurrencies managed to show themselves in all their beauty in those cases for which they seem to be needed?
1. Protection from scammers organizing blockchain.
The mission failed, as a huge number of projects became scams and led to the loss of money of laymen who believed the scammers. If the project has not yet been scammed, then there is always the possibility of hacking, scams due to deliberate filling of holes by developers, and closure of the project due to the fact that the project did not take off and became uninteresting.
Bitcoin is considered to be reinforced concrete, but for some reason the Bitcoin blockchain is designed in such a way that control over the main issue of Bitcoin is given to the organizers, who spend a minimum of effort on mining. The main costs of supporting the network are borne by late miners, who in turn will be screwed by ASIC sellers. And it so interestingly happened that the main holders of Bitcoin are controlled by the United States and bets on the price of Bitcoin were allowed without problems on US exchanges. This means that the price of Bitcoin, if desired by the US authorities, can be reduced to zero.
The second most secure Ethereum initially worked according to the same unfair scheme as Bitcoin, but the transition to PoS made it possible to strengthen centralization with the help of big money and income will be received mainly by those who were at the origins of the creation of the Ethereum crypto-pyramid or who can freeze large sums of money in Ether to obtain an analogue of usurious interest.
2. Providing blockchain services to scammers.
No one has ever stolen as much money as the thieves stole irrevocably by deceiving laymen, hacking blockchains, and smart contracts. If the theft of money from bank accounts or payment cards can be quickly monitored and efforts can be made to return the money, then fraudsters most often have no problems at all with the theft of cryptocurrencies. The vast majority of the population appreciated the danger of blockchain and cryptocurrencies and gave cryptocurrencies a bad name.
3. Transferring cryptocurrencies despite government restrictions.
Transferring cryptocurrencies works, but leaves so many traces on the blockchain that it can be assumed that big scammers prefer cash, which leaves no trace. Petty swindlers are able to steal with impunity. The question arises: why are such preferences given to fraudsters or lawbreakers? After all, the vast majority of the planet's population are law-abiding citizens, and not thieves, smugglers, revolutionaries or terrorists.
What else is bad about current blockchains?
1. Blockchains are orders of magnitude more expensive than conventional centralized databases. Moreover, it is hundreds and thousands of times more expensive. Instead of one server, the blockchain must be served by thousands of servers duplicating the same information. Resources are wasted.
2. Lending using blockchains is a way to rob clinical idiots who provide collateral no less than the loan amount and also pay interest on top.
3. Slow and expensive blockchains such as Bitcoin or Ethereum are easily allowed on US exchanges and receive attention in the media, because these blockchains will never compete with fiat and payment services such as Visa, MasterCard and the like.
4. Most cryptocurrencies are created for pump/dump purposes in order to lure a crowd of laymen and take away their money. Hellish commissions of crypto exchanges accelerate the process of losses. The main income is received by those who invest in crypto pyramids at the very beginning, before selling tokens to a crowd of laymen.
5. Leaking information about crypto exchanges about clients' orders allows pumpers/dumpers to play against the crowd of crypto exchange clients.
If we exclude services and programs related to speculation in cryptocurrencies or fiat-crypto-fiat transfers, then over the past six years not a single application or service has appeared that I or my friends would need and that could be paid only with cryptocurrency . That is, the vast majority of ordinary people do not need crypto, smart contracts, DeFi and other bells and whistles of the crypto industry at all.
From the above we can conclude: the first phase of the cryptocurrency revolution has ended. Cryptocurrencies have caught on in the exchange betting industry, successfully serving crime, technically weak and expensive projects are even allowed for speculation on regulated exchanges.
The current Bitcoin pump, organized in anticipation of the resolution of the spot ETF, is just price manipulation in order to collect money from laymen who are told about a million-dollar Bitcoin. No more. As soon as the next pump/dump ends, the price of Bitcoin portrays a sloth that no one cares about. You can make money from pumps/dumps, but to believe that Bitcoin or slow Ethereum are projects that are necessary and in demand by society is very stupid.
What's next?
Naturally, the disadvantages of screwed-up projects described above are obvious and understandable to many blockchain developers. The only thing left to do is to eliminate all the shortcomings described above and propose projects that can compete with the fiat currencies of the Central Bank-6 cartel and CBDC.