I just want to say that alot of the charts and what people say is wrong and irrelevant.
When talking about the top 10% and how rich they are getting it is wrong.
The top 5% are the rich getting richer. And tip of the spear is not "the 1%" it is gradual within the 5% there is not sudden gap, thought it gets exponential and the 0.001% or something like that is far up.
So what really matters are the top 5% and the middle class.
I think the middle class would be top 50% approximately, maybe 55 or 60%.
The ones at the top of the middle class are better off than the ones at the top and it could be divided but it makes more sense to put the top 5 to 10% with the middle class.
It's always called the "10%" because it is a round number and sounds good...
And what about the bottom 50%? They are irrelevant.
- 12.5% of americans have a disability. How much of the working force? 5%?
- How many students are there? Maybe 1 in 4 of those 50%? Something like that. Is it shocking that they earn little and don't save money, just have enoguh to pay for living expenses while they're studying.
- How many in this bottom 50% - well the 25% left - just started working and are still junior?
- Sad but not anyone's fault, veterans that did not aquire skills in demand in the civilian world are here too.
- Then you have sexual abusers etc, they live in trailer parks and barely have enough money to go by
- Add in part time workers.
- Now what is left of that bottom 50%? 1/5? You got to be realistic and admit there are some people that made bad choices, are lazy, antisocial, etc. Simply put, losers.
And here you have it. There is a good reason the bottom 50% have such a small share of the wealth.
They still get to vote so they can't be too bad off, or gooo Bernie Sanders.
(Alot of these 50% a're not the brightest obviously).