HON happens to be oversold. But I didn't choose it for that reason. I chose it mostly to teach a couple of lessons about trading. I won't probably be updating this idea daily though, because I'm not trading it and I have too many other things to keep track of already. I will try to check in on it once a week or so.
So why did I choose HON? If you asked 100 traders to pick a stock to trade, I'd bet tons of money ZERO would pick HON. It's as sexy as a nun in a parka. For years all it did was go up every day and paid dividends. Yawn.
For the last 45 months it has done nothing from a buy and hold perspective. Literally. It has gone down exactly 23 CENTS. Its 5 year Beta is 1.03. Boringggggg.
In this case boring is perfect, though. This is a great stock to trade. Sideways choppiness is a dream for what I do. Drawdowns tend to be small and not last very long, so I don't need to deploy lots of capital, and the zig-zags = 🤑. The buy and holders make nothing on a stock like this over this time frame and the trend-followers lose a TON in this situation with all the whipsaws stopping them out with a loss.
But this boring company that makes thermostats, fire suppression equipment and PPE would have afforded me 119 trade opportunities in 45 months and outperformed the AAPL backtest I just posted the other day. More on the backtest results for HON later.
The other reason I love unsexy stocks (and so should you if you trade) is that they can be profitable and offer relative safety when tech, or the market in general, is floundering. The more tools in your toolbox (in this case stocks in your trading universe), the easier it is to make money trading. There is a place for boring stocks that just go sideways in my toolbox, and when you see the results you'll find out why it's a very special place.
I honestly didn't expect the results to be all that good. It was going to be a lesson about how lots of small very boring wins add up. And they were mostly small and boring. Almost 1 in 3 trades during this 45 month span made less than 1% and ZERO trades even made it to 10%.
That doesn't scream profits. But there is huge value in what I do, in the consistency it offered. With relatively short and infrequent capital-hungry drawdowns, coupled with lots of trading opportunities, the annualized profit ended up beating out AAPL. Imagine if I said HON > AAPL to most traders on this site. I'd get crucified. It's just not sexy enough for what most people here do, which is try to hit home runs. But just ask Ichiro what lots of singles can do. Sorry for the baseball reference for all you non-fans.
Trades: 119
Closed wins: 117
Open "wins": 1
Open "losers": 0 (hypothetical trade opened at the end of the day today)
That's technically a 100% win rate over 45 months. I will fight anyone who wouldn't take that.
Average gain per trade = +2.3%
Median gain per trade = +2.2%
Average holding period = 20.4 days
Median hold period = 13 days
Most common hold period = 5 days
Those average gain numbers are NOT special. Most would turn their noses up at a trade that takes a month and only makes 2.3%. Not me. Here's why.
Max number of lots held = 13
That allows capital to be freed up to work elsewhere.
Return per lot per day held = +.112%
Annualized return per lot per day held = 28.2%
I will take that return for ever and ever and ever. And you should too when you trade. 28% per year doubles your money in 2.5 years and over 10 years increases your original money 16x if it happens consistently. I'll always take better returns, but there's a lot to be said for CONSISTENT returns that keep you in the game, keep you motivated and to grow your trading capital. Hunting big wins comes with the inherent risk of big losses. A few of those losses strung together and you're looking for a second (or third) job.
Learn to love small but very consistent wins and you will be in this game for a long time.
So let's pretend I opened 1 lot at 201.64 at today's close and see where that takes us. I'm guessing up.