I cleaned the chart a bit for readability.
The chart shows historical inversions in the
US10Y and
US02Y and the drawdowns in the
NDX that followed. The implication is that we should expect to see a >50% drawdown within 4 months. I'm not calling the "why" but only drawing parallels to historical price action following bond market environments.
My current interpretation is that we're headed for stagflation - interest rates will be stickier than consensus takes driven by market uncertainty and increasing energy prices. The Trump administration seems to be pushing for policies that would alleviate pain from stagflation. The next revolution in technology promises massive productivity gains with respect to efficiencies in money transfers and back-end business operations in general. Unemployment will continue to rise as automation begins to increase.
The market will take time to find its bearings (upskilling and learning curves for employees and employers).
The Ai boom requires energy - more than we currently have capacity for. Companies will have to finance this build-out with vast sums of money. The reward will take time to harvest. Pain in the real economy will dampen consumption for a while.
Price action in Ai and technology companies has outpaced realized gains - we are at the front-end of this curve, much like the dotcom bubble.
Speculative bubbles like
BTCUSD represent a direct threat to control over monetary policy for the reserve currency and hegemony. I am still very long USA (Dollar Milkshake).
BTC has real value for struggling economies eclipsed by the majors, but for holders of this asset in the western world, large gains in
BTC would necessarily depend on the collapse of civilization as we know it, implying a logical paradox for people that expect outsized returns.
BTC.D demonstrates the loss of share of market cap well.
I invite comments with legitimate rational criticism as I'm always looking to improve my thinking about this topic.
Long ideas (comment additional tickers):
Short ideas:
I am employing long-expiry, OTM verticals to improve costs of trades or synthetic longs on moonshot names if not holding shares outright.
Share your comments. Good luck to all!
The chart shows historical inversions in the
My current interpretation is that we're headed for stagflation - interest rates will be stickier than consensus takes driven by market uncertainty and increasing energy prices. The Trump administration seems to be pushing for policies that would alleviate pain from stagflation. The next revolution in technology promises massive productivity gains with respect to efficiencies in money transfers and back-end business operations in general. Unemployment will continue to rise as automation begins to increase.
The market will take time to find its bearings (upskilling and learning curves for employees and employers).
The Ai boom requires energy - more than we currently have capacity for. Companies will have to finance this build-out with vast sums of money. The reward will take time to harvest. Pain in the real economy will dampen consumption for a while.
Price action in Ai and technology companies has outpaced realized gains - we are at the front-end of this curve, much like the dotcom bubble.
Speculative bubbles like
I invite comments with legitimate rational criticism as I'm always looking to improve my thinking about this topic.
Long ideas (comment additional tickers):
- Utility-driven tokens enabling this new paradigm -
XRPUSD
XLMUSD
ICPUSD
LINKUSD
XDCUSD
HBARUSD etc.
- Inelastic staples -
LLY
BUD
PM
- Energy and Ai infra -
ABAT
WWR
ENVX
PLUG
LAC
LEU
SMR
CHPT
KMI
QS
ITRI
ENPH
FSLR
CLSK
TSLA
EWTUSD
- Disruption Beneficiaries -
WU
UPW
OPEN
PYPL
FIS
XYZ
FIVN
BGM
Short ideas:
I am employing long-expiry, OTM verticals to improve costs of trades or synthetic longs on moonshot names if not holding shares outright.
Share your comments. Good luck to all!
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.
Disclaimer
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.