Potential reversal area would be between 1940 and 1960 according with my counts and patterns. Levels to watch: 1944, 1959. Target: around 1720
Note
this is the map of the whole move up from 1765:
Now, this count would ends at 1959. Above, the game could change, means that we might not are in a big corrective ABC (the yellow bigger path), but into an impulsive 5 drive waves. So above 1965 the proce could drive to 2k and above.
Note
Note
OK, after varius changes I got the valid labeling in EW theory for counting this move as valid a corrective: so, if we are in a "double three" as i think, this would be the correct labeling: WXY with inner double ABC.
Note
We arrived to our third entry level at 1959, lets see:
Note
ooooook: 1959 has worked out like a clockwork! NOW: it looks like a 5 3 5 down (the last small wave down still missed). If it will come back up from this area, would means that we are in the big uptrend (the big wave5), otherwise, a potential formation of another motive in south direction would means that we are heading below 1800. I close the large part of my positions here and i'll wait to see what will be the next move.
Note
this is the outlook of the BAT pattern at 4hr:
Note
if this will continues below 1.618% that blue C wave is not a C but a giant wave 3 :D in that case we might see the 1700s
Note
outlook of the pattern:
Note
i'm start to considering this count as valid:
Note
Note
the red count of potential 5 waves down illustrated above is NOT a VALID count. I say this cause a more precise count of the subwaves shows an imprecision on that potential wave 1, in wich we cant count regular 5 subwaves, so that not seems a valid impulse for the wave 1. On the contrary that first leg appears like a 3 waves formation. For this reason i'm back on the previous scenario of an ABC (3-3-5 waves formation). In effect we could have an extended flat (3-3-5 ABC) that completes at 1.618% extension of AB (a perfectly valid extended flat at the last level of completition). Red arrows show the potential completition levels of that C (last leg, that is formed internally by an impulse of 5 valid subwaves). This is the outlook on the chart:
Note
The next move could be a 3 waves formation in upside like this:
Note
The above analysis would predicts a B wave up before the real last move down (the "C"), to complete the entire upper cycle of 3 waves down:
Note
Updates:
light blue or yellow path would be the next move, also if judging by the inner counts i would say the yellow, so a touch at 1812 is possibile before a reload up to 1900 area.
Detailed view:
Note
lets see if it will play out
Note
ok, the above count of 5 waves down to 1812 has been invalidated, so probably the wave 5 was what I labeled as "C" in the above white path. So this is the new potential count for the moment
Note
So i think that we are in a bigger "B" leg up to around 1905 that would be made by 3 drive waves (inner ABC).
This would be the A:
The B:
Now we going up to complete the inner C:
Note
So, trying to understand all the internal moves and predict next, what i can see now from the count of the inner legs is the possibility of a complex corrective move, cause i think now that the "C" (most of the time a complex leg) will be made by an inner 3 3 5 (first two legs A-B respectively: 335, 535) and now we are in the second series of 3 (the inner B): that might ends around 1870-1878 area.
After that another series of 5 down to complete the inner C:
then finally last series of 3 up to 1890 - 1910 area:
This is just a speculation at the moment, but would explain all the previous internal moves of yesterday.
Note
The alternative count (maybe more simple) is that the inner B is already completed by a sub 335 and we are going down from 1862 another time with 5 waves heading 1830 area: then the C:
Note
Well, i think that both above potential counts are not valid cause i see a failed C at 1862 and after that all 3 waves formation, so we maybe are in a contracting triangle (inner abcde inside a complex correction that could means that the next move will in downtrend: (my.elliottwave.com/images/tutorial/fig1-47.gif)
Note
Well, may we have to back to our previous idea (the first one from the last week, above) of an impulse of 5 in downtrend??? (thats may be the first of a 3 drive zigzag A-B-C)
This was the original forecast:
This is the actual structure:
Now, this leg that is forming is maybe a last C down (the red path), or a wave 2 of 3 into the big wave 5. There are some clues that indicate that we may are in effect into a wave 5: for example the fact that the first big move down was beyond the last potential level of 1.618% for a C. On the contrary, still remain that first wave that looks as a 3 and not a 5 drive waves. So, now the confirmation for the impulse would be a break down of the actual 1.618% at 1821.
Note
Note
this maybe the shape of the 4:
Note
neither the above count was correct!
Note
After a few failed tentatives of forecasting the inner moves (above this) this is the next one, in wich we might stay into the big wave 4 again. So we are building a complex correction (abcde) with the max high around 1882 in the C leg (that is building right now): lets see.
Note
I get this hypothesis based on the internal counts from whic i see all corrective waves made by 3 inner legs that looks to me as a potential A-B of 3-3, so the next one might be a C up. So, if also this legs will be made of 3 we will see a 3 3 3 formation that cant be a regular ABC but would be a oart of a bigger 3 3 3 3 3 (an ABCDE wave 4?):
Note
No way, also the last forecast for an inner move was wrong, so now this 2 counts are both valid:
Note
May we are in a triple zigzag correction up, assuming this move as a wave 2 of the bigger 5?
Note
The minuscole count shows that is a realistic possibility, acording also with the relative extensions:
Note
This is what i see right now, a potential 3 3 5 into the relative B before the rise up for the C (into the bigger B):
The information and publications are not meant to be, and do not constitute, financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice or recommendations supplied or endorsed by TradingView. Read more in the Terms of Use.