SMHI - Can an ugly chart actually be a good play?This is one of those charts I had on a watchlist titled "Waiting For Bottom". I checked in on Friday and it was touching the bottom of the channel. Boom!
Is this post a prediction? Nope. Do I think this Elliott Wave count is for sure accurate? Nope. So what is this?
First of all, remove all of the markings and look at the chart with nothing but price action. What do you see? If your answer is a "a complete mess that was generally melting up until the middle of 2024", you'd be correct. This is not a trending stock with a high probability setup. There is no clear 5-waves up pattern playing out. In fact, there is no clear anything pattern playing out. But that's exactly why I think this "might" be a diagonal and might be an interesting play for a solid risk/reward.
What is a diagonal you ask? Let's make sure you understand.
In Elliott Wave, there are only TWO types of bullish patterns. The first is the classic 5-wave impulse where the underlying trends up in odd numbered waves and correcting each one in the even numbered waves. Think of a lightning bolt.
1 - Up off a low.
2 - Corrects 1, can't move below it.
3 - The breakout, usually the most impulsive and powerful wave.
4 - Corrects 3, can't break below the top of 1.
5 - The final move up, can be powerful, can be weak, but will almost always give a higher high.
5-wave impulsive moves start when the underlying is very bearish. Wave 1 starts by getting back to or breaking a key resistance area. Those who jump in during it are considered early adopters. The only support is the previous low. The vast majority of market participants are avoiding. Once it tops and rolls over, the majority are convinced new lows are coming. Some early adopters sell out or take profit. But a successful Wave 2 holds above the previous low, giving a higher low setup. It is followed by a consolidation as momentum builds up in the beginning of the 3rd wave. Once Wave 3 breaks out above Wave 1, smart technical traders start jumping in. Maybe it happens on an earnings report and some fundies jump in. It starts to really trend as more heads start to turn and realize that not only did it hold a higher low, buts its also working on a higher high. And if it is powerful enough, it will break more resistance and more and more participants will jump in. Eventually though, Wave 3 tops. Many early adopters take their profit and leave. It consolidates into a Wave 4, holding another higher low above the Wave 1 top. But as it starts Wave 5, the majority of the participants are now the late adopters and retail traders, with a spattering of early adopters who still have a small tranche left, already being in the green on smart sales at the top of Wave 3. Wave 5 then completes, often trapping late adopters who were sure it was going to the moon.
Well this stock doesn't seem to be that. This thing overlaps all over the place. It could be an upward corrective wave of some sort before a drop to new lows. But as of now, it's playing along nicely with what its called a diagonal.
A diagonal is a 5-wave structure. But this one is different. With diagonals, Wave 3 "can" overlap below the top of Wave 1. And one of the leading clues you might be in a diagonal is when the subwaves break down into segments of 3 wave moves instead of 5 wave moves. Why does this exist? Well, it starts off similar to a standard 5-wave move. A low is formed and a move is commenced off of it. But the succeeding retracement of that move is VERY deep, retracing almost all of the first move up. The next higher high is then around 100-161.8% of the first move, with the retracement that follows also very deep. All of this is likely happening within Wave (1) and Wave (2) of the diagonal. See, market participants are so polarized with the underlying, that they are whipping it back and forth, neither side able to ultimately win very long, yet the bulls slightly nudging out the bears with marginal higher highs and higher lows. It continues this whipsaw with every move, slowly melting upward. Instead of the whole 5-wave pattern targeting the 176.4%-200% extension of Wave 1 from the bottom of Wave 2 (what happens in a standard 5-wave impulse), it targets lower extension levels, typically the 161.8% level.
Diagonals are either LEADING or ENDING moves. They CAN NOT be 3rd waves in larger patterns. So you will either get one as a first wave of a larger move, or you will get one to finish a larger move. In this case, it would be a leading diagonal of something much larger.
So back to this specific stock. Thanks for enduring the educational section. Let's talk why I think this is a diagonal.
You can see the wave labels clearly outlining the 3-wave moves within the larger 5-wave diagonal. They are labeled ABC within the (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). At present, this is within $1 of the ideal retracement level of the (3)rd wave for Wave (4). And it's clearly the 3rd segment of the ABC we would expect for a corrective (4)th wave. Not only that, it's holding the channel (but that's not required, just an area of support). Diagonals do often retrace deep, so I wouldn't be surprised to see it continue to the 76.4% correction area around $4.50. If you are risk averse, you could enter in the current area with stop just under $4.49. But as long as it holds the Wave (2) low, the diagonal stays valid. Ideally, it would be either contracting (trendline connecting (1), (3), and (5) contracting toward trendline connecting (2) and (4)) or expanding (same thing, but trendlines diverging away from each other), with expanding diagonals being pretty rare, but possible. They can tend to run in channels as well. So ideally, this doesn't get much lower as that would turn it into an expanding diagonal, which we know is rare, and leads to future bullish action being even MORE unreliable.
Standard supply and demand zones are on the chart representing major support and resistance areas. If this holds support, it likely finds renewed strength up toward resistance and will bounce around in mostly unpredictable, overlapping structures that generally melt up. But once it engages the next C Wave, you should be able to track a standard 5-wave pattern within that C, as C-waves are always 5-wave structures.
As I stated at the beginning, in no way is this a reliable structure. But you see things like this fairly often, and anywhere from second to monthly charts. The longer the duration, the more confusing, as you can have years of price movement that seem to make no sense. Ultimately, you have to watch supports and play smart. Is this something you want to align a lot of your money in? Probably not. It's unpredictable at best. And it could fail at any moment at worst since diagonals are "technically" corrective structures even when bullish. But is a chart like this giving up a setup for potentially phenomenal risk/reward? You bet. Just make sure and manage your risk. And you do that with your position sizing, using an appropriate stop *and if you get stopped, stay stopped. You set it for a reason, don't second guess), and understanding your targets, making sure to de-risk as quick as possible by selling enough at key levels to get your original equity back should it move upward.
Feel free to ask questions. This was meant to be educational and shed some light on a complicated chart structure while providing a thesis for how to potentially play it.
Standard disclosures:
1. This is 100% my idea. It was not sourced from any other avenue.
2. I am not invested in this company, though I am likely buying shares soon.
3. I am not paid to post content nor do I receive any contributions of any kind.
4. While this is outlining a potential profitable setup, this article is not investment advice. You should do your own due diligence on any company you invest in and apply your own trading strategies.
5. I know nothing about the fundamentals of this company. I suggest doing your due diligence if fundamentals are important to you.
6. Readers should always remember that markets are their own creature made up of millions of individuals and institutions each following some combo of inherent bullishness, inherent bearishness, fundamentals, technicals, stupidity, and pure emotion. Elliott Wave, and specifically Fibonacci Pinball (developed by Avi Gilburt at elliottwavetrader.net and prominent Seeking Alpha author), merely provide a framework based on the observed price action to date.
7. I know that while my wave outline is based on years and years of data and application from not only me, but some of the best in the game, I also know that markets do not follow a set path and that sentiment can remain irrational far longer than I can remain rational. That is why you MUST consider the alternatives and manage risk appropriately. Know the pivot zones that could lead to the primary path failing.
I warrant that the information created and published by me on TradingView is not prohibited, doesn't constitute investment advice, and isn't created solely for qualified investors. My analysis is not a recommendation for a specific trade. My analysis outlines a potential scenario and provides risk assessments for multiple alternate scenarios. My analysis is purely educational.
Elliottwavepattern
💨 Elliott Wave Pattern: Triangle 🌊●●● 𝙏𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙡𝙚 (T)
__________________________
❗️❗️ 𝙂𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙧𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨
● A triangle always subdivides into five waves.
● At least four waves among waves A , B , C , D and E are subdivided into a single zigzag .
● A triangle never has more than one complex subwave, in which case it is always a multiple zigzag or a triangle.
❗️ 𝙂𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙜𝙪𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨
● Usually, wave C subdivides into a "multiple zigzag" that is longer lasting and contains deeper percentage retracements than each of the other subwaves.
● Usually, wave D subdivides into a "multiple zigzag" that is longer lasting and contains deeper percentage retracements than each of the other subwaves.
● Alternating waves of a triangle may be in Fibonacci proportion to each other by a ratio of 0.618 for contracting triangles and 1.618 for expanding triangles. For example, in a contracting triangle, look for wave C to equal 0.618 of wave A .
● A triangle can be wave 4 impuls, wave B of a zigzag , wave X of a double or second wave of an X of a triple zigzag , sub-wave C , D or E of a triangle and the last structure of a combination.
__________________________
●● 𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙏𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙡𝙚 (Contr.T — CT)
❗️❗️ 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨
● Wave C never moves beyond the end of wave A , wave D never moves beyond the end of wave B , and wave E never moves beyond the end of wave C . The result is that going forward in time, a line connecting the ends of waves B and D converges with a line connecting the ends of waves A and C .
● Waves A and B never subdivide into a triangle.
● In a running triangle, wave B should be no more than twice as long as wave A . (Q&A EWI)
❗️ 𝙂𝙪𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨
● Sometimes one of the waves, usually wave C , D or E , subdivides into a contracting or barrier triangle. Often the effect is as if the entire triangle consisted of nine zigzags.
● About 60% of the time, wave B goes beyond the beyond the start of wave A . When this happens, the triangle is called a running triangle.
__________________________
●● 𝘽𝙖𝙧𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙧 𝙏𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙡𝙚 (Barr.T — BT)
❗️❗️ 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨
● Wave C never moves beyond the end of wave A , wave D never moves beyond the end of wave B , and wave E never moves beyond the end of wave C . The result is that going forward in time, a line connecting the ends of waves B and D converges with a line connecting the ends of waves A and C .
● Waves B and D end at essentially the same level.
● In a running triangle, wave B should be no more than twice as long as wave A . (Q&A EWI)
❗️ 𝙂𝙪𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨
● About 60% of the time, wave B goes beyond the beyond the start of wave A . When this happens, the triangle is called a running barrier triangle.
● When wave 5 follows a triangle, it is typically either a brief, rapid movement or an exceptionally long extension.
☝️ 𝙉𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙨
● We have yet to observe a 9-wave barrier triangle, implying that this form may not extend.
__________________________
●● 𝙀𝙭𝙥𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙏𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙡𝙚 (Exp .T — ET)
❗️❗️ 𝙍𝙪𝙡𝙚𝙨
● Wave C , D and E each moves beyond the end of the preceding same-directional subwave. (The result is that going forward in time, a line connecting the ends of waves B and D diverges from a line connecting the ends of waves A and C .)
● Subwaves B , C and D each retrace at least 100 percent but no more than 150 percent of the preceding subwave.
❗️ 𝙂𝙪𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨
● Subwaves B , C and D usually retrace 105 to 125 percent of the preceding subwave.
☝️ 𝙉𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙨
● No subwave has yet been observed to subdivide into a triangle.
__________________________
🔗 References:
Elliott Wave Principal 2005
RSWA: Q&A EWI
🧮 Elliott Wave Pattern. Combination: "Double Three"●● Combination ( CMB ): "Double Three"
The SZ (FL) -X-T combination is the most common.
❗❗ Rules
● A "double three" combinations comprise two corrective patterns separated by one corrective pattern in the opposite direction, labeled X . (The first corrective pattern is labeled W , the second Y )
● A "double three" flat combination comprises (in order) a zigzag and a flat, a flat and a zigzag, a flat and a flat, a zigzag and a triangle or a flat and a triangle.
● Wave X is any corrective wave. *
● Wave X always retraces at least 90 percent of wave W .
● Only one of the W or Y waves can appear as a single zigzag.
● Combinations can occur in the same wave positions as flats and triangles (except for the triangle subwave) but cannot occur in waves W , Y or Z .
* most likely, except for the triangle.
❗ Guidelines
● The X wave is often 123.6% of the W wavelength.
● When a zigzag or flat appears too small to be the entire wave with respect to the preceding wave (or, if it is to be wave 4 , the preceding wave 2 ), a combination is likely.
☝ Notes
● An expanding triangle has yet to be observed as a component of a combination
Elliott Wave Principal 2005
Can Bitcoin really target $8400/$8500+ from here?Good Friday morning, traders. We made it through the week and now, with the weekend upon us, absolutely anything is possible in this market. At this point, we still have the $7900 target from the IHS and price continues to hover around $7400/$7500. The TFs don't get overbought until the 4H, which means that there's room for price to break and run a bit. Speaking of the 4H, it has remained overbought for four days now. We know a pullback is needed, the question is when will we see it?
Price continues to sit just under the daily cloud and appears to be printing a bullish pennant. During last night's TA video, I discussed the possibility of price making a very large move up from this area based on the height of the flagpole leading up to that pennant. If it starts around $6200, then that sets up a target of around $8900/$9000. I just don't see price having that much juice behind it at the moment after the previous movement up. However, if the overhead supply zone fails to contain price, then as I have continued to mention, there are a ton of shorts that would likely rush to cover as that zone is significant and its breach should see price ultimately targeting $10K+. This would also put price above the large descending wedge's resistance line as well as the daily cloud (the latter not having been seen since January 2018). So, a narrative could be carved that would support such a move.
If, instead, we just take the flagpole from the previous start of the most recent large movement up which is the $6700/$6800 area, then price should target $8400/$8500. This is the area where I have previously said I could see price reaching during Wave 5 because it lines up pretty well with the daily pivot from two periods ago which sits at $8470. Personally, I prefer this movement as it allows price to then correct back toward the supply zone it pushed through to get there, which should become a demand zone, as well as the top of the daily cloud and the descending resistance line which should become support. In other words, that move would turn the current area of confluence of resistance into a confluence of support. It would also better fit what should be happening in terms of a Wyckoff accumulation period as I outlined a while ago.
The final possibility on a move up lies in the pennant, itself. If the pattern is nothing more than a symmetrical triangle (due to the fact that it doesn't actually start with the flagpole), then price should be targeting the height of the triangle upon breakout. In this case, that should see price only targeting the $7800/$7900 area which would complete the subwave 5 of the Wave 3 as I outlined the other day.
Failure of price to breach the recent high of $7600 on July 18th should result in a retracement (Wave 4), possibly as far as the $7100 area. This of course would be a positive step as price recoups and prepares for that aforementioned push through the strong confluence of resistance. The longer this drags out at the current level, however, the less inclined I am to believe we will have that particular retracement prior to the push through. Alts have continued to slowly bleed while BTC dominance has increased during this time as well. This often portends a legitimate bull run. I have been mentioning for a few months now that I wanted to see BTC dominance breach 46% as doing so would give us a higher low and higher high since January 2018 which would denote a bullish trend in that dominance. Currently, it is sitting at 45.2%.