Get started

BOS

Differences in Philip & CHoCH Scenarios When an area is immediately broken we will have ( CHoCH ) . When an area on the opposite side is consumed and the price returns, we expect the area that caused the failure to be consumed at the time trigger. When an area reacts but cannot break the surface, we have ( FILIP ) . When the price breaks the opposite areas and consumes one and returns, we expect in the time trigger to consume the area that caused the failure. Continued ENTER Two modes occur. We either lost the Filip or ( CHoCH ) scenario and are waiting for it to return. Or a high time zone is broken by a lower time trigger where we expect orders to continue flowing.
Education
by mohamadrezaKhorsand
3
Shark Almost Complete!USOIL - Shark almost complete, wanting a pullback into that 1H supply zone/imbalance before looking for continuations down to the D point! Let me know your thoughts! * Disclaimer ** These ideas I never trade until the end target with my initial lots, I focused on high probable entries with higher lots and use a specific partial taking strategy giving me a very high win rate and take most of my profits very early, I only leave a small % of my capital to run the entire trade. On the flip side im constantly monitoring LTF momentum and will close early if things change, these analysis's are for research purposes only.
TVC:USOILShort
by benalistarfx
2
Wyckoff Distribution TELLmany failed upthrusts occurred within the upper range and medium range of the channel. One major lesson I have learned with identifying a Wyckoff schematic is that ranges must be horizontal. Horizontal ranges would identify price levels. This is far more important than resistance levels. Though price and resistance may be the same, the concepts listed evolve around price still. Thus, this means that horizontal ranges are far more potent than angled ranges. This being said, now you can paint the real picture of strength and weakness at price ranges. As you may see here, a big distribution is set in, we have a bullish stance at the BC, AR, ST level. The bias is a reaccumulation. However, it seems that we have sold into a minor sign of weakness. Price has then remained there in phase b, finally. We have confirmation of weakness as we go to retest the ST areas in phase a, failing to make a big upthrust. it is now that we are ready to move down. It is evident that big money has sold off their shares to others.
TShort
by Integrity_Investments
2