Get started

Ether

Ethereum 6X Lev. Full PREMIUM Trade-Numbers —2nd Entry—PP: 1806%This is a second entry for a long-term leveraged chart setup for ETHUSDT (Ether). This is truly the last chance to get Ethereum at low prices before a major bullish impulse, the biggest one in a long time. The chart structure is perfect. The low conditions look very similar to June 2022, very similar. We have long-term higher lows blah blah blah... By now, you already know all these things as I read this chart a million times. I don't have much to say other than remain calm, whatever happens. Sleep easy because Crypto is going up. It is as simple as that. It will grow, soon. Full trade-numbers below: _____ LONG ETHUSDT Leverage: 6X Entry levels: 1) $1,900 2) $1,825 3) $1,630 Targets: 1) $2,125 2) $2,405 3) $3,347 4) $4,017 5) $4,871 6) $6,000 7) $7,337 Stop-loss: Close weekly below $1,600 Potential profits: 1806% Capital allocation: 3% _____ I would like to thank you again for reading. Your support is appreciated. I know it is a lot of content but this is meant for many different people all across the world. If you like what you see make sure to follow. If you want to see more, leave a comment and boost to show your support. This is the big one. Namaste.
Long
by MasterAnanda
Ether-Bitcoin Ratio Signals ETH Is 'Extremely Undervalued,' The cryptocurrency market is a realm of intricate signals, complex metrics, and often-conflicting narratives. Among the myriad indicators traders and investors scrutinize, the Ether-Bitcoin (ETH/BTC) ratio holds a prominent place. This metric, a simple division of Ethereum’s price by Bitcoin’s price, serves as a barometer for the relative strength and market sentiment between the two leading crypto assets. Recently, this ratio has dipped to levels that historically signaled significant undervaluation for Ether, sparking debate about a potential upcoming rally. However, a confluence of factors – notably surging ETH supply, stagnant network demand, and a weakened token burn mechanism – casts a considerable shadow over this optimistic outlook, suggesting that past performance may not be a reliable guide in the current, uniquely challenging environment. Understanding the ETH/BTC Ratio: A Barometer of Relative Strength At its core, the ETH/BTC ratio reflects the market's perception of Ethereum's value proposition relative to Bitcoin. When the ratio trends upwards, it indicates that ETH is outperforming BTC, suggesting growing investor confidence in Ethereum's ecosystem, technological advancements, or utility. Conversely, a declining ratio signifies BTC's relative strength, potentially due to factors like "digital gold" narratives, safe-haven appeal, or specific Bitcoin-centric catalysts. A low ETH/BTC ratio, such as those observed in recent times, is often interpreted by analysts as a sign that ETH is "cheap" or "undervalued" compared to Bitcoin. The logic is that, over time, capital flows within the crypto market tend to seek out assets with stronger growth potential or those perceived as lagging behind their fundamental value. If ETH is indeed undervalued, the expectation is that it will eventually catch up, leading to a rally in both its USD price and its value relative to BTC. This potential for "mean reversion" or a "catch-up trade" is what excites many market participants when the ratio hits historical lows. Historical Precedents: When Undervaluation Sparked Rallies The argument for an impending ETH rally based on the current low ETH/BTC ratio is not without historical merit. There have been several instances where a depressed ratio preceded substantial upward movements for Ether. 1. Post-2018 Crypto Winter: After the ICO boom and subsequent crash, the ETH/BTC ratio languished for an extended period. However, as the DeFi (Decentralized Finance) ecosystem began to gain traction in 2020 ("DeFi Summer"), ETH, as the foundational layer for most DeFi protocols, experienced a resurgence. The ratio climbed significantly as capital flowed into Ethereum to participate in yield farming, lending, and decentralized exchange activities. 2. The NFT Boom (2021): The explosion of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) in early 2021, predominantly on the Ethereum blockchain, provided another major catalyst. The increased demand for ETH to mint, buy, and sell NFTs pushed its price and the ETH/BTC ratio upwards, as Ethereum's utility as a platform for digital collectibles and art became undeniable. 3. Anticipation of The Merge (2021-2022): As Ethereum moved closer to its pivotal transition from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) – "The Merge" – market sentiment turned increasingly bullish. The promise of significantly reduced energy consumption, coupled with the "ultrasound money" narrative (where ETH issuance would drastically decrease and potentially become deflationary due to EIP-1559's burn mechanism), fueled strong buying pressure. The ETH/BTC ratio saw notable gains during periods of heightened Merge anticipation. In these instances, the low ETH/BTC ratio acted as a tinderbox, and specific fundamental catalysts served as the spark that ignited significant rallies. Investors who recognized the undervaluation signal and anticipated these catalysts were handsomely rewarded. This historical pattern underpins the current optimism among some analysts who see the present low ratio as a similar buying opportunity. The Complicating Factors: Why This Time Might Be Different Despite the compelling historical precedents, the current market environment for Ethereum presents a unique set of challenges that complicate the simple "undervalued, therefore rally" thesis. These headwinds stem from fundamental shifts in Ethereum's tokenomics and network dynamics. 1. Surging Supply: The Post-Merge Issuance Reality While The Merge successfully transitioned Ethereum to a more environmentally friendly PoS consensus mechanism, its impact on ETH supply has been more nuanced than initially portrayed by some bullish narratives. • Staking Rewards: Under PoS, new ETH is issued as rewards to validators who stake their ETH to secure the network. While the rate of new ETH issuance is significantly lower than it was under PoW, it is still a consistent inflationary pressure. The annual inflation rate from staking rewards is currently in the low single digits. • Net Issuance vs. Deflation: The "ultrasound money" thesis largely depended on the EIP-1559 burn mechanism (discussed later) consistently burning more ETH than is issued through staking rewards, leading to a net deflationary supply. However, this has not always been the case post-Merge. There have been extended periods where ETH has been net inflationary. • Unstaking and Liquid Staking Derivatives: The ability for validators to unstake their ETH (enabled by the Shanghai/Capella upgrade) means that previously locked supply can re-enter the market. Furthermore, the proliferation of Liquid Staking Derivatives (LSDs) like Lido's stETH or Rocket Pool's rETH, while enhancing capital efficiency, also means that staked ETH is not entirely removed from liquid circulation, as these derivative tokens can be traded or used in DeFi. This consistent, albeit reduced, issuance contributes to sell pressure, especially if demand does not keep pace. The narrative of ETH becoming a deflationary asset has been weakened, impacting one of the key bullish arguments that previously supported a higher ETH/BTC ratio. 2. Flat Demand: A Stagnant Network Picture For ETH's price to appreciate significantly, there needs to be robust demand for the token, driven by network usage and adoption. Currently, several indicators suggest that demand is, at best, flat, and in some areas, declining. • Network Activity Metrics: Key on-chain metrics such as daily active addresses, transaction counts, and total gas consumed have shown periods of stagnation or even decline. While Layer 2 scaling solutions are processing more transactions, this activity doesn't always translate directly into proportional demand for ETH on the mainnet, especially if Layer 2s manage their own fee markets efficiently. • Total Value Locked (TVL) in DeFi: While DeFi remains a cornerstone of Ethereum's value proposition, the growth in TVL has slowed considerably compared to the explosive growth seen in 2020-2021. Capital inflows into DeFi protocols on Ethereum have been less aggressive, partly due to macroeconomic conditions, regulatory concerns, and the emergence of competitive DeFi ecosystems on other blockchains. • Competition from Alternative Layer 1s and Layer 2s: Ethereum faces increasing competition from other Layer 1 blockchains (e.g., Solana, Avalanche, Aptos, Sui) that offer higher throughput and lower transaction fees, attracting users and developers. Moreover, Ethereum's own Layer 2 ecosystem (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon zkEVM, Starknet, zkSync Era), while crucial for its long-term scalability, also fragments user activity and can, in some ways, reduce direct demand pressure on ETH for L1 transactions if users primarily operate within these L2 environments. • Macroeconomic Headwinds & Regulatory Uncertainty: Broader economic conditions, including inflation, interest rate hikes, and recession fears, have generally dampened risk appetite across financial markets, including crypto. Additionally, the ongoing regulatory uncertainty in key jurisdictions like the United States creates an environment of caution, potentially hindering institutional adoption and large-scale investment in assets like ETH. • NFT Market Cool-Down: The NFT market, which was a significant driver of ETH demand, has experienced a substantial cool-down from its peak in 2021-2022. While innovation continues, transaction volumes and average sale prices have fallen, reducing the ETH velocity associated with this sector. Without a significant uptick in genuine network demand – more users transacting, more capital flowing into DeFi, a resurgence in NFT activity, or new killer dApps emerging – it becomes harder for ETH to absorb the ongoing supply issuance and stage a sustainable rally. 3. Weakened Burn Mechanics: The Diminished Impact of EIP-1559 EIP-1559, implemented in August 2021, was a landmark upgrade for Ethereum. It introduced a mechanism where a portion of every transaction fee (the "base fee") is burned, permanently removing that ETH from circulation. This was a key pillar of the "ultrasound money" narrative, as it created a deflationary pressure that could, under conditions of high network demand, outpace new ETH issuance. However, the effectiveness of this burn mechanism is directly tied to network congestion and the level of the base fee. • Lower Network Congestion: In periods of lower network activity and congestion (as has been observed more frequently recently), the base fee required to get transactions included in a block decreases. A lower base fee means less ETH is burned per transaction. • Impact of Layer 2s: As more transaction activity shifts to Layer 2 scaling solutions, which have their own, typically much lower, fee structures, the demand for block space on Ethereum Layer 1 can decrease. While L2s do periodically batch transactions and settle them on L1 (consuming L1 gas and contributing to the burn), the overall L1 gas consumption directly attributable to individual user transactions might be lower than if all those transactions occurred on L1. • Periods of Low Burn: Consequently, there have been extended periods post-Merge where the amount of ETH burned via EIP-1559 has been insufficient to offset the ETH issued as staking rewards. During these times, ETH's supply becomes net inflationary, undermining the deflationary narrative that was a strong catalyst in previous cycles. While EIP-1559 remains a crucial and beneficial upgrade for Ethereum's fee market predictability, its power as a consistent deflationary force has been tempered by the current realities of network demand and the evolving Layer 2 landscape. Synthesizing the Outlook: A Tug-of-War The current situation for Ethereum is a complex tug-of-war. On one side, the historically low ETH/BTC ratio flashes a compelling "undervaluation" signal, suggesting a potential for significant upside based on past market behavior. This attracts traders looking for relative value plays and those who believe in Ethereum's long-term fundamental strengths. On the other side, the fundamental picture is clouded by persistent, albeit reduced, supply issuance, a lack of explosive growth in network demand, and a burn mechanism whose deflationary impact is currently muted. These factors create genuine headwinds that could prevent ETH from easily replicating its past ratio-driven rallies. For ETH to truly capitalize on its apparent undervaluation relative to Bitcoin, several things likely need to occur: 1. A Resurgence in Demand: This could come from a new "killer app" or narrative on Ethereum, a significant rebound in DeFi or NFT activity, increased institutional adoption (perhaps spurred by clearer regulation or new investment products like spot ETH ETFs in more jurisdictions), or a general improvement in macroeconomic conditions that boosts risk appetite. 2. Successful Maturation and Value Accrual from Layer 2s: As Layer 2 solutions mature and gain wider adoption, their success needs to translate into tangible value accrual for ETH itself. This could happen through increased L1 settlement demand, the use of ETH as a primary gas token on L2s, or innovative mechanisms that tie L2 economic activity back to the L1 token. EIP-4844 ("Proto-Danksharding") is a step in this direction by aiming to reduce L2 transaction costs, potentially fostering more L2 activity and, consequently, more L1 settlement. 3. A Shift in Broader Market Sentiment: Often, major altcoin rallies, including for ETH, occur after Bitcoin has established a strong uptrend and market sentiment becomes broadly bullish. A sustained Bitcoin rally could create a "wealth effect" and encourage capital to rotate into ETH and other altcoins. Conclusion: Caution Warranted Despite Undervaluation Signals While the ETH/BTC ratio strongly suggests that Ether is trading at a significant discount compared to Bitcoin, historical precedent alone may not be enough to guarantee a rally in the current market. The fundamental challenges posed by ongoing supply, relatively flat demand, and a less potent burn mechanism are significant and cannot be ignored. Investors and traders eyeing ETH must weigh the allure of its apparent undervaluation against these tangible headwinds. A potential ETH rally is likely contingent not just on the ratio mean-reverting, but on a demonstrable improvement in Ethereum's core demand drivers and a favorable shift in the broader market environment. The "extremely undervalued" signal is a call for attention, but thorough due diligence and a clear understanding of the current complexities are more crucial than ever. Ethereum's long-term vision remains ambitious, but its path to reclaiming relative market dominance against Bitcoin in the near term appears more challenging than in previous cycles.
COINBASE:ETHUSDLong
by bryandowningqln
Ethereum's $2k Crossroads: Squeeze Up or Crash Down?Ethereum at a Crossroads: Eyeing $2,000 Amidst Short Squeeze Hopes, Crash Warnings, and Existential Questions Ethereum (ETH), the bedrock of decentralized finance (DeFi) and the engine behind countless non-fungible tokens (NFTs), finds itself ensnared in a complex web of conflicting market signals and divergent analyst opinions. On one hand, recent price action shows resilience, with ETH powering through previous resistance levels and setting its sights on the psychologically significant $2,000 mark. This move is potentially bolstered by intriguing on-chain data, such as declining supply on major exchanges like Binance, sparking whispers of an impending short squeeze. Yet, casting a long shadow over this optimism are stark warnings: technical analysts point to rare, potentially bearish patterns forming, prominent trading firms question its fundamental value proposition compared to Bitcoin (BTC), highlighting its staggering year-to-date losses, and some even provocatively label it more akin to a "memecoin." This cacophony of bullish hopes and bearish alerts places Ethereum at a critical juncture. Is the recent surge the beginning of a sustained recovery, fueled by tightening supply and renewed developer activity? Or is it merely a deceptive bounce within a larger downtrend, vulnerable to a potential crash as underlying weaknesses and unfavorable comparisons to Bitcoin take hold? Dissecting these opposing narratives is crucial for understanding the intense battleground Ethereum's price chart has become. The Bullish Ascent: Powering Through Resistance, Eyeing $2,000 The immediate catalyst for renewed optimism stems from Ethereum's recent price performance. After a period of consolidation and, at times, significant downward pressure, ETH has demonstrated notable strength. Headlines proclaiming "Ethereum Price Powers Through Resistance — Eyes on $2,000?" capture this sentiment. Breaking through previously established resistance levels (potentially building on support found around the $1,800 mark) is a technically significant event. It suggests buyers are stepping in with enough conviction to overcome selling pressure that had previously capped advances. Successfully reclaiming and holding levels above former resistance transforms these zones into potential new support floors, providing a base for further upward movement. The $2,000 level looms large, not just as a round number, but often as a key area of historical price interaction – a zone where significant buying or selling interest has previously materialized. A decisive break above $2,000 could inject further confidence into the market, potentially attracting momentum traders and reinforcing the bullish narrative. The Binance Supply Drop and Short Squeeze Speculation Adding intrigue to the bullish case is the observation of declining Ether supply on major exchanges, specifically Binance. Exchange supply is a closely watched metric. When the amount of ETH held on exchanges decreases, it generally implies that investors are withdrawing their coins to private wallets, often for longer-term holding ("HODLing") or for use within the DeFi ecosystem (staking, lending, etc.). This reduction in readily available supply on exchanges can, in theory, create a tighter market. This dynamic fuels speculation about a potential "short squeeze." A short squeeze occurs when the price of an asset starts to rise rapidly, forcing traders who had bet against it (short sellers) to buy back the asset to close their positions and cut their losses. This forced buying adds further upward pressure on the price, creating a rapid, cascading effect. If a significant number of traders have shorted ETH, anticipating further price declines, a sustained move upwards coupled with shrinking exchange supply could create the conditions for such a squeeze, dramatically accelerating the price towards and potentially beyond the $2,000 target. While short squeezes are relatively rare and difficult to predict accurately, the declining supply on a major platform like Binance certainly adds a compelling element to the bullish thesis. Underlying Strengths: The Long-Term Vision Beyond short-term price action and supply dynamics, Ethereum's bulls point to its fundamental strengths. The successful transition to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) via "The Merge" was a monumental technical achievement, drastically reducing the network's energy consumption and changing its tokenomics by potentially making ETH a deflationary asset under certain conditions (where more ETH is "burned" via transaction fees than is issued as staking rewards). Ongoing scalability upgrades, often referred to under the umbrella of Ethereum 2.0 developments (like proto-danksharding via EIP-4844), aim to reduce transaction fees and increase throughput, making the network more efficient and attractive for developers and users. Ethereum remains the dominant platform for smart contracts, DeFi applications, and NFT marketplaces. Its vast developer community, established network effects, and continuous innovation pipeline are often cited as core long-term value drivers that short-term price volatility cannot erase. For believers in Ethereum's vision, the current price levels, even after the recent bounce, might represent an opportunity to accumulate an asset with significant future potential. The Bearish Counter-Narrative: Red Alerts and Worrying Comparisons However, the optimism is heavily tempered by significant bearish signals and critiques. This serves as a stark warning. Technical analysis involves studying chart patterns and indicators to forecast future price movements. While the specific "rare pattern" isn't detailed, the emergence of such signals often causes significant concern among traders. Patterns like head-and-shoulders tops, descending triangles, or bearish divergences on key indicators can suggest that upward momentum is waning and a significant price decline could be imminent. Such technical warnings cannot be easily dismissed, especially when they align with other concerning factors. The Stark Reality: Underperformance and the "Memecoin" Jab Perhaps the most damaging critique comes from the direct comparison with Bitcoin and the assessment of Ethereum's recent performance. A large year-to-date drop is a brutal statistic, especially when Bitcoin, while also volatile, may have fared comparatively better during the same period (depending on the exact timeframe and BTC's own fluctuations). Why the "memecoin" comparison? Memecoins are typically characterized by extreme volatility, price movements driven largely by social media hype and sentiment rather than clear fundamental value, and a lack of a distinct, widely accepted use case beyond speculation. While some calling Ethereum a memecoin is hyperbolic – given its vast ecosystem and utility – the critique likely stems from its recent high volatility and its struggle to maintain value relative to Bitcoin. The trading firm's assertion that Ether's "risk-reward is now unjustifiable compared to Bitcoin" encapsulates this view. They likely argue that Bitcoin's clearer narrative as a potential store of value or "digital gold," potentially bolstered by institutional adoption via ETFs, offers a more compelling investment case with potentially less downside risk compared to Ethereum, which faces ongoing scalability challenges, competition from other Layer 1 blockchains, and perhaps greater regulatory uncertainty regarding its status (security vs. commodity). This underperformance raises difficult questions. If Ethereum is the backbone of Web3, why has its price struggled so much relative to its peers or even its own potential? Possible contributing factors include: 1. Capital Rotation: The excitement and capital inflows surrounding spot Bitcoin ETFs may have drawn investment away from Ethereum and other altcoins. 2. Regulatory Uncertainty: Ongoing debates, particularly in the US, about whether ETH should be classified as a security could be creating hesitancy among institutional investors. 3. Competition: Numerous alternative Layer 1 blockchains (Solana, Avalanche, etc.) are competing fiercely for developers and users, potentially fragmenting the market share Ethereum once dominated. 4. Post-Merge Narrative Shift: While technically successful, the immediate post-Merge price action was underwhelming for many, and the narrative focus may have shifted elsewhere. Synthesizing the Dichotomy: A Market Divided Ethereum's current situation is a textbook example of a market grappling with deeply conflicting data points and narratives. • Bullish Signals: Price breaking resistance, targeting $2k, falling exchange supply, potential short squeeze, ongoing network development, strong ecosystem. • Bearish Signals: Severe YTD underperformance, concerning technical patterns ("red alert"), critical comparisons to Bitcoin's risk/reward, being labeled "memecoin-like" by traders, regulatory overhang, Layer 1 competition. This dichotomy creates significant uncertainty. Is the falling supply on Binance a sign of HODLer conviction paving the way for a short squeeze, or simply users moving assets to DeFi protocols, with little bearing on immediate price direction? Is the push towards $2,000 the start of a real trend reversal, or a bull trap set by bearish technical patterns? Is Ethereum's fundamental value being overlooked amidst short-term noise, or are the critiques about its risk/reward profile relative to Bitcoin valid warnings? Investor Sentiment and Key Factors to Watch This environment fosters polarized investor sentiment. Optimists see a buying opportunity, focusing on the recent strength and long-term potential. Pessimists see confirmation of underlying weakness and prepare for further declines. The path forward will likely be determined by several key factors: 1. Bitcoin's Trajectory: As the market leader, Bitcoin's price action heavily influences the broader crypto market, including Ethereum. Continued strength in BTC could provide a tailwind for ETH. 2. Technical Levels: Whether ETH can decisively breach and hold $2,000, or if it gets rejected, will be a critical short-term indicator. Equally important is whether current support levels hold during any pullbacks. 3. Exchange Flows & On-Chain Data: Continued monitoring of exchange supply, staking activity, and transaction volumes will provide clues about investor behavior. 4. Regulatory Developments: Any clarification on Ethereum's regulatory status, particularly in the US, could significantly impact sentiment. 5. Macroeconomic Environment: Broader market risk appetite, influenced by inflation, interest rates, and economic growth prospects, will continue to play a role. Conclusion: Navigating Ethereum's Uncertain Path Ethereum stands at a precarious crossroads. The recent climb towards $2,000, supported by encouraging signs like falling exchange supply, offers a glimmer of hope for bulls anticipating a recovery and perhaps even a short squeeze. However, this optimism is aggressively challenged by alarming technical warnings, significant underperformance compared to market expectations and Bitcoin, and pointed critiques questioning its current investment viability. The "memecoin" comparison, while harsh, reflects a genuine frustration and concern among some market observers about ETH's volatility and perceived lack of decisive direction relative to the "digital gold" narrative solidifying around Bitcoin. The formation of rare bearish patterns adds a layer of technical urgency to these concerns. Ultimately, the market remains deeply divided on Ethereum's immediate future. The battle between the potential for a supply-driven squeeze towards $2,000 and the risk of a pattern-induced crash is palpable. Investors must weigh the platform's undeniable long-term technological significance and ecosystem strength against the immediate headwinds of poor recent performance, regulatory ambiguity, and concerning technical signals. The coming weeks are likely to be crucial in determining whether Ethereum can overcome the prevailing skepticism and validate the recent bullish momentum, or if the bears will regain control, confirming the warnings of a continued downturn. The price action around the $2,000 level will be a key battleground in this ongoing struggle. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. It is based on the analysis of the provided headlines and general market knowledge. It does not constitute financial advice. Investing in cryptocurrencies involves significant risk, including the potential loss of principal. Readers should conduct their own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
COINBASE:ETHUSDShort
by bryandowningqln
4
ETHUSDT is Breaking Out!! Is the Bull Run Finally Here?After a long period of consolidation within a descending channel, BINANCE:ETHUSDT is showing signs of life as it finally breaks out with bullish intent. This technical breakout could mark the beginning of a fresh bull run, reminiscent of past explosive moves we’ve seen from MARKETSCOM:ETHEREUM following major corrections. Historically, CRYPTOCAP:ETH has experienced drawdowns of over 90%, only to bounce back stronger and reach new all-time highs. Currently, BITSTAMP:ETHUSD remains deep in the oversold zone, suggesting it’s still undervalued relative to its potential. As momentum begins to pick up, we could see targets being hit one by one, driven by renewed investor interest and favorable market conditions. Moreover, the recent surge in COINBASE:ETHUSD ETF inflows adds fundamental weight to the technical setup. This institutional participation could act as a catalyst for a sustained rally, reinforcing the bullish bias. That said, risk management is key. Always trade with a clear stop loss and position sizing to protect capital. The opportunity is brewing – the question is, are you ready to ride the wave?

 BYBIT:ETHUSDT Currently trading at $1790

 Buy level : Above $1750 Stop loss : Below $1490 Target : $4000 Max leverage 3x Always keep stop loss 

Follow Our Tradingview Account for More Technical Analysis Updates, | Like, Share and Comment Your thoughts
Long
by GreenCryptoTrades
Warning: Low Ethereum Target LoomsThe Unthinkable Target: Is $1,000 ETH Really in Play? Suggesting Ethereum could fall back to $1,000 might seem hyperbolic to those who remember its peak near $5,000. However, the crypto market is notorious for its brutal volatility and deep drawdowns. Bitcoin itself has experienced multiple corrections exceeding 80% from its all-time highs throughout its history. While Ethereum has matured significantly, it's not immune to severe market downturns or shifts in narrative dominance. A $1,000 price target represents a roughly 65-70% decline from prices seen in early-to-mid 2024 (assuming a starting point around $3,000-$3,500) and an approximate 80% drop from its all-time high. While drastic, such a move could become plausible under a confluence of negative circumstances: 1. Severe Macroeconomic Downturn: A deep global recession, coupled with sustained high interest rates or a major credit event, could trigger a massive risk-off wave across all assets, hitting speculative investments like crypto particularly hard. 2. Regulatory Crackdown: Punitive regulations targeting DeFi, staking, or specific aspects of Ethereum's ecosystem could severely damage sentiment and utility. 3. Technological Stagnation or Failure: Major setbacks in Ethereum's scaling roadmap or the discovery of a critical vulnerability could erode confidence. 4. Sustained Loss of Narrative: If competing blockchains definitively capture the dominant narrative for innovation, speed, and cost-effectiveness, ETH could lose its premium valuation. 5. Technical Breakdown: A decisive break below key long-term support levels (like the previous cycle highs around $1,400 or psychological levels like $2,000) could trigger cascading liquidations and stop-loss orders, accelerating the decline towards lower supports, including the $1,000 vicinity which acted as significant resistance/support in previous cycles. While not a base-case prediction for many, the $1,000 target serves as a stark reminder of the potential downside if the current negative pressures persist and intensify, particularly within a broader bear market context. The factors currently driving ETH's weakness provide fuel for this bearish contemplation. Reason 1: The Underwhelming Arrival of Spot Ethereum ETFs Following the monumental success of Spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US, which attracted tens of billions in net inflows within months of launch, expectations were sky-high for their Ethereum counterparts. The narrative was compelling: regulated, accessible vehicles would unlock a floodgate of institutional capital, mirroring Bitcoin's ETF-driven price surge. However, the reality has been starkly different and deeply disappointing for ETH bulls. Since their launch, Spot Ethereum ETFs have witnessed tepid demand, characterized by weak inflows and, at times, even net outflows. The initial excitement quickly fizzled out, failing to provide the anticipated buying pressure. Several factors contribute to this underwhelming debut: • Pre-Launch Regulatory Uncertainty: The SEC's approval process for ETH ETFs was far less certain and more contentious than for Bitcoin. This lingering ambiguity, particularly around Ethereum's classification (commodity vs. security) and the handling of staking, may have made some large institutions cautious. • Lack of Staking Yield: Unlike holding ETH directly or through certain other investment products, the approved US Spot ETH ETFs do not currently offer holders exposure to staking yields – a core component of Ethereum's tokenomics and a significant draw for long-term investors. This makes the ETF product inherently less attractive compared to direct ownership for yield-seeking capital. • Existing Exposure Channels: Institutional players interested in Ethereum already had established avenues for gaining exposure, including futures markets (CME ETH futures), Grayscale's Ethereum Trust (ETHE, although less efficient pre-conversion), and direct custody solutions. The incremental demand unlocked by the spot ETFs may have been smaller than anticipated. • Market Timing and Sentiment: The ETH ETFs launched into a more challenging macroeconomic environment and a period of cooling sentiment in the broader crypto market compared to the Bitcoin ETF launch window. The initial risk-on euphoria had faded, replaced by concerns about inflation, interest rates, and geopolitical tensions. • "Sell the News" Event: As often happens in markets, the period leading up to the ETF approval saw significant price appreciation. The actual launch may have triggered profit-taking by traders who had bought in anticipation of the event. The impact of these weak ETF flows is significant. It signals a lack of immediate, large-scale institutional appetite for ETH through this specific channel, removing a key bullish catalyst that many had banked on. It also contributes to negative market sentiment, reinforcing the narrative that Ethereum is currently out of favor compared to Bitcoin or other trending assets. Without this expected wave of ETF-driven buying, the price is more susceptible to selling pressure from other sources. Reason 2: Derivatives Market Flashing Red - Low Interest, Negative Funding The derivatives market, particularly perpetual futures, provides crucial insights into trader sentiment and positioning. Two key metrics are currently painting a bearish picture for Ethereum: Open Interest (OI) and Funding Rates. • Low Open Interest (OI): Open Interest represents the total number of outstanding derivative contracts (longs and shorts) that have not been settled. While OI naturally fluctuates, consistently low OI relative to historical peaks or compared to Bitcoin's OI suggests a lack of strong conviction and reduced speculative interest in Ethereum. When traders are uncertain or bearish, they are less likely to open large, leveraged positions, leading to subdued OI. This indicates that fewer market participants are willing to bet aggressively on ETH's future price direction, especially on the long side. • Negative Funding Rates: Funding rates are periodic payments exchanged between long and short position holders in perpetual futures contracts. They are designed to keep the futures price tethered to the underlying spot price. o Positive Funding: When the futures price trades at a premium to spot (contango) and bullish sentiment dominates, longs typically pay shorts. This incentivizes shorting and disincentivizes longing, helping to pull the prices back together. o Negative Funding: When the futures price trades at a discount to spot (backwardation) and bearish sentiment prevails, shorts pay longs. This indicates a higher demand for short positions (either speculative shorting or hedging long spot holdings). Consistently negative funding rates, as observed for ETH during periods of weakness, are a strong bearish signal. It means traders are actively paying a premium to maintain short exposure, reflecting widespread pessimism about the price outlook. • The combination of low Open Interest and negative Funding Rates creates a negative feedback loop. It shows reduced speculative appetite, a dominance of short positioning, and a lack of leveraged longs willing to drive the price higher. While extremely negative funding can sometimes precede a "short squeeze" (where rising prices force shorts to cover, accelerating the rally), the persistent nature of these conditions recently suggests underlying weakness rather than an imminent explosive reversal. This bearish derivatives landscape acts as a significant headwind, absorbing buying pressure and making sustained rallies difficult. Reason 3: The Relentless Rise of Competing Layer-1s Ethereum's primary value proposition has long been its status as the dominant, most secure, and most decentralized platform for smart contracts and decentralized applications (DApps). However, its reign is facing its most significant challenge yet from a growing cohort of alternative Layer-1 (L1) blockchains, often dubbed "ETH Killers." While Ethereum still dominates in terms of Total Value Locked (TVL) in DeFi and overall network value, competing L1s like Solana, Avalanche, Cardano, and newer entrants are rapidly gaining ground in crucial areas of network activity: • Transaction Throughput and Fees: Many competitors offer significantly higher transaction speeds (transactions per second) and dramatically lower fees compared to Ethereum's mainnet. While Ethereum's Layer-2 scaling solutions aim to address this, the user experience on some alternative L1s can feel faster and cheaper for certain applications, attracting users and developers. • Active Users and Daily Transactions: Chains like Solana have, at times, surpassed Ethereum in metrics like daily active addresses and transaction counts, particularly fueled by specific niches like meme coins, high-frequency DeFi, or certain NFT projects. This indicates a migration of user activity seeking lower costs or specific functionalities. • Developer Activity and Ecosystem Growth: While Ethereum retains a vast developer community, alternative L1s are aggressively courting developers with grants, simpler tooling (in some cases), and the allure of building on the "next big thing." This leads to vibrant DApp ecosystems growing outside of Ethereum. • Technological Differentiation: Competitors often employ different consensus mechanisms (e.g., Proof-of-History, Avalanche Consensus) or architectural designs that offer trade-offs favoring speed or specific use cases over Ethereum's current approach (though Ethereum's roadmap aims to incorporate many advancements). The impact of this intensifying competition is multifaceted. It fragments liquidity and user attention across multiple platforms. It challenges the narrative of Ethereum's unassailable network effect. Crucially, it reduces the relative demand for ETH itself, which is needed for gas fees and staking on the Ethereum network. If users and developers increasingly opt for alternative platforms, the fundamental demand drivers for ETH weaken, putting downward pressure on its price relative to these competitors and the market overall. Ethereum is no longer the only viable option for building or using decentralized applications, and this increased competition is clearly impacting its market position and price performance. The Path to Reversal: What Needs to Change for Ethereum? Despite the current headwinds and the looming shadow of lower price targets, Ethereum is far from dead. It possesses a resilient community, the largest developer base, significant first-mover advantages, and a comprehensive roadmap for future upgrades. However, a sustainable trend reversal requires tangible progress and shifts across several fronts: 1. ETF Flows Must Materialize: The narrative needs to shift from disappointment to tangible success. This requires sustained, significant net inflows into the Spot ETH ETFs, potentially driven by broader institutional adoption, clearer regulatory frameworks globally, or perhaps future ETF iterations that incorporate staking yields (though regulatory hurdles for this are high). 2. Derivatives Sentiment Needs to Flip: Open Interest needs to build substantially, indicating renewed speculative conviction. More importantly, funding rates need to turn consistently positive, signaling a shift towards bullish positioning and leveraged longs re-entering the market. 3. Successful Execution of Ethereum's Roadmap: Continued progress and successful implementation of Ethereum's scaling solutions are paramount. Wider adoption and tangible impact from upgrades like Proto-Danksharding (EIP-4844) reducing Layer-2 fees, and clear progress towards future milestones like Verkle Trees and Statelessness, are needed to demonstrate Ethereum can overcome its scalability challenges and maintain its technological edge. 4. Reigniting Network Activity and Demand: Ethereum needs compelling new applications or upgrades to existing protocols that drive genuine user demand and increase the consumption of ETH for gas. This could come from innovations in DeFi, NFTs, GameFi, decentralized identity, or other unforeseen areas. The narrative needs to shift back towards Ethereum as the primary hub of valuable on-chain activity. 5. Favorable Macroeconomic Conditions: Like all risk assets, Ethereum would benefit significantly from a broader shift towards risk-on sentiment, potentially fueled by central bank easing (lower interest rates), controlled inflation, and stable global growth. 6. A Renewed, Compelling Narrative: Ethereum needs a clear and powerful story that resonates beyond its existing user base. Whether it's focusing on its superior security and decentralization, its role as the foundational "settlement layer" for the digital economy, or a new killer application, a refreshed narrative is needed to recapture investor imagination and justify a premium valuation. Conclusion: Ethereum at a Critical Juncture Ethereum's recent price struggles are not arbitrary; they are rooted in tangible factors: the lackluster performance of its spot ETFs, bearish signals from the derivatives market, and the undeniable pressure from faster, cheaper Layer-1 competitors. These elements combine to create an environment where contemplating a fall towards $1,000, while bearish, is a reflection of the significant challenges the network faces. However, Ethereum's history is one of resilience and adaptation. It has weathered bear markets, technical hurdles, and competitive threats before. The path back to sustained growth and potentially new all-time highs is challenging but not impossible. It hinges on reigniting institutional interest via ETFs, flipping derivatives sentiment, successfully executing its ambitious technological roadmap to counter competitors, and benefiting from a supportive macro environment. Until these positive catalysts materialize convincingly, Ethereum may continue to lag, and the possibility of further downside, even towards the $1,000 mark in a severe downturn, will remain a topic of discussion among market participants navigating the crypto giant's uncertain future.
COINBASE:ETHUSDShort
by bryandowningqln
Ethereum Elliot Wave Theory: $19,000 & Altcoins Market UpdateThe market is shaking but nothing truly changes. Ethereum is on a path that will end with a price above $10,000 USD. Ether (ETHUSDT) can easily trade at $11,111, $15,000 or even $19,000 in the latter part of 2025. Think about the market conditions and sentiment when Ether trades above 10K. Take a moment to think. Visualize. What do you see, hear, sense or feel? The low was set March 10. Ethereum has been bearish since March 2024. 11-March 2024 was the main and first peak. 10-March 2025 was the main bottom and low. An entire year of bearish action. The market never moves straight down nor straight up. The bullish action in late 2024 is part of a complex correction. It can be called an inverted correction within a long-term correction. The last bear-market ended with a bottom being hit June 2022. This was followed by slow but steady growth; bullish consolidation. Prices were sideways but producing higher lows. Then a bullish wave developed to end 2023 and went through March 2024. March 2024 marked the end of this cycle and the start of a major, long-term complex correction. This correction ended last month. The end of the correction marks the start of the next bull-market cycle. The 2025 bull-market. This bull-market is not yet fully obvious but it will be clear within less than 2 months. There will be growth but for the majority of the participants to realize that yes, it is happening, it will take even longer. Altcoins Market In General Some projects bottomed in February, others in March. Most of them ended their correction in February 2025, there are always variations. This low is a long-term higher low. Many projects bottomed in late 2024. After a strong rise to end the year, we had a correction and this puts us in the current situation. Once the correction ends (already over) a new bullish impulse starts. The bullish impulse is composed of five waves. Three moves forward with two steps back. ➢ The first wave is up and green. Wave 1. ➢ The second wave is down and red. Wave 2. ➢ The third wave is the biggest wave. This wave tends to produce the highest volume and lots of momentum. Up and green. Wave 3. ➢ The fourth wave will be down and red and it will alternate the second wave. For example, if the second wave is long in duration, the fourth wave will be short. If the second wave is fast, the fourth wave will be slow. Etc. Wave 4. ➢ The fifth wave signals the end of the bullish impulse and this is the speculative wave. This is where anything is possible. Anything can happen within this wave. Trading volume will be lower compared to the third wave but new All-Time Highs are hit here and after this wave is over, the start of a new long-term correction or bear-market. Wave 5. This is the map based on Elliot Wave Theory terminology. Everything is looking ready right now. Signals are starting to show pointing to the start of major growth. What one does, the rest follows. Look at EOS. I just shared an article. Visit my profile and read it for a simple and quick example. Don't be surprised when Ethereum trades above $10,000. Be prepared. Take profits when prices are high and up. The time to buy is now. Focus on the long-term. Thanks a lot for your continued support. Namaste.
Long
by MasterAnanda
14
Why is Eth Falling? ETH/BTC Ratio Hits All-Time Low Since 2020Why is Ethereum Falling? ETH/BTC Ratio Hits All-Time Low Since 2020 The cryptocurrency market is a volatile landscape, constantly shifting and evolving. Recent data has revealed a significant development: the Ethereum to Bitcoin (ETH/BTC) ratio has plummeted to an all-time low since 2020. This stark decline, currently resting at a mere 0.02 has ignited a wave of speculation and concern within the crypto community, raising questions about Ethereum's current standing and future trajectory. The ETH/BTC ratio serves as a crucial metric for comparing the relative performance of Ethereum against Bitcoin. When the ratio falls, it indicates that Bitcoin is outperforming Ethereum, and conversely, a rising ratio suggests Ethereum's ascendancy. The current dramatic drop highlights a significant divergence in the fortunes of these two leading cryptocurrencies. The backdrop to this decline is multifaceted. Bitcoin, often seen as the “digital gold” of the crypto world, has exhibited remarkable resilience and strengthened its position. This consolidation is likely driven by several factors, including increased institutional adoption, regulatory clarity in some jurisdictions, and its established reputation as a store of value. These factors have contributed to a sense of stability and confidence in Bitcoin, attracting capital and bolstering its market position. Ethereum, on the other hand, has faced challenges in maintaining its momentum. While it remains the leading platform for smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps), it has struggled to keep pace with Bitcoin's surge. Several factors contribute to this relative underperformance. Firstly, regulatory uncertainty surrounding Ethereum and its classification has cast a shadow over its future prospects. The evolving regulatory landscape, particularly in major economies like the United States, has created a sense of unease among investors. The lack of clear guidelines and the potential for stricter regulations have dampened enthusiasm and limited institutional investment. Secondly, Ethereum has faced competition from emerging layer-1 blockchains that offer faster transaction speeds and lower fees. These “Ethereum killers,” as they are sometimes called, have attracted developers and users seeking alternatives to Ethereum's perceived limitations. While Ethereum has undergone significant upgrades, such as the transition to proof-of-stake (The Merge), the benefits have not yet translated into a sustained surge in its relative value. Thirdly, the overall market sentiment has played a role. Bitcoin's narrative as a safe haven and store of value has resonated strongly during periods of economic uncertainty. In contrast, Ethereum, with its focus on innovation and development, is perceived as a riskier asset. When market volatility increases, investors often gravitate towards the perceived safety of Bitcoin. The decline in the ETH/BTC ratio raises several critical questions. Is Ethereum in trouble? Is this a temporary setback or a sign of a more fundamental shift in the crypto landscape? While the current situation is concerning, it is essential to consider the long-term potential of Ethereum. Its robust ecosystem, driven by a vibrant community of developers and innovators, remains a significant asset. Ethereum's role in powering decentralized finance (DeFi), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and other emerging technologies positions it as a crucial player in the future of the internet. Furthermore, Ethereum's ongoing development efforts, including layer-2 scaling solutions and future upgrades, aim to address its scalability and efficiency challenges. These improvements could potentially revitalize Ethereum's performance and restore its competitive edge. However, the current market dynamics suggest that Ethereum faces an uphill battle. To regain its footing, it needs to overcome regulatory hurdles, address its scalability issues, and effectively communicate its value proposition to a broader audience. The cryptocurrency market is notoriously unpredictable, and past performance is not indicative of future results. The ETH/BTC ratio could rebound, or it could continue its downward trajectory. The outcome will depend on a complex interplay of factors, including regulatory developments, technological advancements, and market sentiment. In the meantime, the low ETH/BTC ratio serves as a stark reminder of the dynamic nature of the cryptocurrency market. It underscores the importance of diversification and the need for investors to consider the risks and potential rewards of each asset carefully. The current situation also highlights the need for Ethereum developers and community members to focus on the core values of the project, and to continue to innovate and improve the technology. Ultimately, the success of Ethereum will depend on its ability to adapt to the changing landscape and deliver on its promise of a decentralized and equitable future. In conclusion, while the record low ETH/BTC ratio raises concerns about Ethereum's current standing, it is premature to declare its demise. The cryptocurrency market is constantly evolving, and Ethereum's long-term potential remains significant. However, the current challenges demand a proactive and strategic approach to ensure its continued relevance and success in the years to come.
by bryandowningqln
Ethereum Not Dead- i know some peoples think ETH will go to 250$ or 500$, so wait for it... - I've always maintained that I'm not a fan of ETH because of its scalability limitations and centralization, for that reason ETH needs some messy L1...L2...etc.. - That said, my opinion doesn’t matter much, ETH is here to stay. The Ethereum ecosystem hosts thousands of projects; I’d say it’s too big to fail. - i used Bitstamp exchange to look further back in the chart's history. - i simplified this monthly chart so much that even a 10 year old kid could understand it, just check the RSI low levels and compare it with previous years. Again, check the max RSI level for the previous ATHs. - i won't discuss where to buy because, whether you get ETH at $1,800 or $1,500, the bull run for ETH and Altcoins hasn't started yet. Happy Tr4Ding !
BITSTAMP:ETHUSDLong
by thecryer
4
ETHEREUM price is alarming...#ethereum price has closed a weekly candle below 3 years of trendline for the first time!.. This is the one negative only. The other fact is, #eth price has already declined from the weekly ichimoku cloud and lost support. These must not be underestimated. I' ve warned you about CRYPTOCAP:ETH price structure weakness weeks ago. What' ll be next? Allrigt. ETH has took support this zone and is now testing 2000 usd support zone. To avoid this sign of "major weakness", #eth price must immediately reclaim 3000 usd and above with monthly candle close. With this weekly close, it' s now getting harder to shelter the trend reversal. For now 2000 usd moderate and 1450 usd are now strong support zones for #ethusd .Otherwise, things will get more serious in mid term. Not financial advice. DYOR.
Short
by naphyse
Public trade #22 - #ETH price analysis ( Ethereum )💰 In continuation of our global idea for #Ethereum 03/02/25 for the first time liquidations on CRYPTOCAP:ETH exceeded liquidations on CRYPTOCAP:BTC There are already a lot of “investigations” from Twitterers and not only how manipulative the market drain was on “red-black” Monday, but these are the realities of an unregulated market and “crazy” participants at all levels and ranks!) They achieved their goal of wresting assets, including CRYPTOCAP:ETH , from weak hands and accumulating them in strong hands for future achievements. In particular, the Trump family foundation owns $400m+ of #ETH, half of which was bought back at the recent notorious drop. Well, we need to be in the trend and also bribe #ETH into our investment portfolio and crypto trading 🟢 Desirable OKX:ETHUSDT purchase zone - $2441-$2551 1️⃣ TP1 - $3800-3900 2️⃣ TP2 - $5900-6000 ⌛️ And then: we'll see... _____________________ Did you like our analysis? Leave a comment, like, and follow to get more
by P_S_trade
4
Bitcoin Gains, Ethereum Struggles, Hashprice SurgesBitcoin Eyes Further Gains as Ethereum Struggles With Declining Demand and Bitcoin Hashprice Hits One-Month Highs, A Bullish Signal for Miners The cryptocurrency market is a dynamic and ever-shifting landscape, with different assets experiencing varying fortunes. While Ethereum grapples with declining demand and network activity, Bitcoin is showing signs of renewed strength, buoyed by positive on-chain metrics and a resurgence in miner profitability.1 This article delves into the factors contributing to Bitcoin's current momentum, contrasting it with Ethereum's struggles and highlighting the significance of rising hashprice for Bitcoin miners. Bitcoin's Resurgence: A Confluence of Positive Factors Several factors are contributing to Bitcoin's current positive trajectory: • Renewed Institutional Interest: Despite the bear market of 2022, institutional interest in Bitcoin remains significant. Many institutional investors view Bitcoin as a long-term store of value and a hedge against inflation.2 Recent reports suggest renewed inflows into Bitcoin investment products, indicating a resurgence of institutional confidence. • Positive On-Chain Metrics: On-chain metrics, such as the number of active addresses, transaction volume, and long-term holder accumulation, provide valuable insights into the health of the Bitcoin network. Several key on-chain indicators are currently flashing bullish signals, suggesting increasing network activity and strong holding behavior. • Growing Adoption: While still early, Bitcoin adoption continues to grow globally. More businesses are accepting Bitcoin as payment, and more individuals are using it as a store of value. This growing adoption contributes to Bitcoin's long-term value proposition. • Hashprice Surge: One of the most significant indicators of Bitcoin's current strength is the resurgence of hashprice. This metric, which represents the estimated revenue a miner earns per unit of hashing power, has hit one-month highs. This increase is a direct result of both rising Bitcoin prices and increased transaction fees, providing much-needed relief to miners. Ethereum's Struggles: Declining Demand and Network Activity In contrast to Bitcoin's positive momentum, Ethereum is facing challenges related to declining demand and network activity. Several factors contribute to this downturn: • Competition from Layer-2 Solutions: The rise of layer-2 scaling solutions on other blockchains has diverted some activity away from the Ethereum mainnet. These solutions offer faster and cheaper transactions, making them attractive alternatives for certain use cases. • Decreased DeFi Activity: The decentralized finance (DeFi) sector, which was a major driver of Ethereum's growth in 2020 and 2021, has seen a significant decline in activity. This decline has reduced demand for Ethereum block space and contributed to lower transaction fees. • NFT Market Cool-Down: The non-fungible token (NFT) market, another significant driver of Ethereum network activity, has also experienced a cooling-off period. This has further reduced demand for Ethereum transactions. Bitcoin Hashprice: A Bullish Signal for Miners The recent surge in Bitcoin hashprice is a crucial development for the Bitcoin ecosystem. Hashprice is calculated by dividing the total revenue earned by miners (from both block rewards and transaction fees) by the total network hash rate. A higher hashprice indicates increased profitability for miners. The combination of rising Bitcoin prices and increasing transaction fees has driven the recent increase in hashprice. This is particularly important because miner profitability is crucial for the security and stability of the Bitcoin network. When miners are profitable, they are incentivized to continue securing the network, ensuring its resilience against attacks. The Significance of Transaction Fees Transaction fees play a vital role in the Bitcoin network. They incentivize miners to include transactions in blocks and contribute to the network's long-term sustainability. As the block reward (the amount of Bitcoin awarded to miners for each block they mine) continues to halve approximately every four years, transaction fees will become an increasingly important source of revenue for miners. The recent increase in transaction fees is a positive sign for the Bitcoin network's long-term health. It demonstrates that users are willing to pay for block space, indicating continued demand for Bitcoin transactions. Conclusion While Ethereum faces challenges related to declining demand and network activity, Bitcoin is showing signs of renewed strength, driven by positive on-chain metrics, renewed institutional interest, and a resurgence in miner profitability. The recent surge in hashprice, fueled by rising Bitcoin prices and increasing transaction fees, is a particularly bullish signal for the Bitcoin ecosystem. This combination of factors suggests that Bitcoin is well-positioned for further gains in the near future. It's important to remember that the cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and past performance is not indicative of future results. However, the current3 trends suggest that Bitcoin is entering a period of renewed strength, while Ethereum faces headwinds that could impact its short-term performance. The dynamic nature of the crypto market necessitates continuous monitoring and adaptation to new information.
COINBASE:BTCUSDLong
by bryandowningqln
ETH BTC broke down the multi-cycle support trendline on HTFWe previously expected a reversal on multiple occasions, unsuccessfully each time. Last major prediction is visible in the chart (blurred). There were two major lines of support for ETHBTC, it broke the first one, then it bounced off the multi-cycle support line and we predicted the bottom at that stage and went long. Unfortunately, that bounce was both short-lived and weak and ultimately it reversed all the bounce and broke down BELOW the multi-cycle support line for ETHBTC. We will not be shorting this, but the long-time frame for ETHBTC is now in the bearish mode. Potential key levels to watch are marked below.
Short
by Goldsworth
3