Trading the News: How Dueling Speeches Affected the GBPUSDJust wanted to document how tracking the news should be an important part of EVERY trader's practice...
Take for example, an hourly chart of this week's GBPUSD...
In particular, notice how this week's MOST significant price action corresponds with two major speeches by UK officials.
In the first instance, BoE governor Mark Carney delivered a "dovish" speech where the headline message was "no rate hikes yet"
www.bloomberg.com
However, no less than 24 hours later, Chief Economist and UK-MPC Andy Haldane delivered a "hawkish" speech which put him directly at odds with Carney.
www.theguardian.com
Both speeches initiated a 100pips movement (1st decline, then rally) in a relatively short period...
So, the lesson to take from this moment...? Stay on top of your news..!!!
(For those who don't know: I highly recommend ForexFactory as a great source of fundamental announcements as well as breaking news...)
Good Luck and Always Trade Mindfully...!
...$B...
Macroeconomics
Civilian Employment to Population Ratio -great toolThe head and shoulders formation is a classic sell setup that traders are familiar with. A close below the neck line is a sell signal for traders. Well, as you can see this was a signal of an economic downturn and it predicted it in the summer before the market crash in the fall. This would have alerted people to prepare for the impending doom and for traders to sell short like Dr. Michael Burry of Scion Capital did with his hedge fund. The market low was set in the spring but the employment low occurred later. The previous lows set in 1961 and 1975 gave an angled level of support at which the recent 2011 low was set. We are now at civilian employment to population ratio levels of 1985! Let that sink in, 1985. This was a severe economic crash that we have yet to recover from. This data is from 1948 until 2017. I wish it started with data before the crash of 1929. What pattern was given then to signal a crash? I think this is a chart to keep an eye on every now and again.
Is Another Financial Crisis Coming to the United States?"In general, we find that monetary policy should react to asset prices and should try to “prick” or “burst” asset bubbles." (Roubini 2005) Though it is clear they have not done so, anyone can see that there is an asset bubble in the stock, bond, and housing markets yet the FED continues their Zero Interest Rate Policy, and continues to print money at unprecedented rates while increasing debt and the deficit. The government's refusal to curb asset prices many years ago has led to a massive asset bubble that is waiting to collapse as soon as they raise interest rates, but now because commodity prices are very depressed as compared to 2007 "then the level of corporate debt remains beyond that which can be financed out of the depressed cash flows of a recession, and debt continues to accumulate, setting off a chain reaction of bankruptcies." (Barnett 2000) This asset bubble has been exasperated by "investment managers are willing to bear the low probability “tail” risk that asset prices will revert to fundamentals abruptly, and the knowledge that many of their peers are herding on this risk" which is particularly problematic in "an environment of low interest rates following a period of high interest rates" and can lead to "sharp and messy realignments" (Rajan 2005)
A "sharp and messy realignment" will lead to massive deflation in asset prices and force the government to increase their deficit spending to maintain their 2% inflation target, and because the primary way to finance a larger deficit in a depressed economy will be to print more money, and because "large budget deficits financed by money creation are widely believed to be the primary force sustaining prolonged high inflation processes." (Kiguel 1989) then this could lead to hyperinflation as deficit spending reaches unsustainable levels and the only way to conceivably pay it back is through hyperinflation or default.
If the FED would have raised interest rates many years ago when an asset bubble was becoming apparent then we could have possibly avoided such a big mess, but since they let this bubble extend out as far as possible without any attempt at curbing it when it does correct the FED is now left with very few tools to stimulate the economy. Interest rates are out. This leaves them primarily with printing money and deficit spending to raise inflation rates. They also have a few other tools, like raising the price of commodities artificially (see Gold Reserve Act). All of these methods will lead to the eventual destruction of the dollar and of any debts that are denominated in dollars, if and when another recession comes the government is left with the only option of destroying the dollar to save the economy. Now a destruction of the dollar is obviously a far off tale right now, but if this next recession comes then it is very likely to be the government's last resort to stimulate the economy and prevent a total financial collapse. Chances are it won't work to prevent a total collapse and the US will lose its position as the reserve currency of the world and we will fall into an extended period of economic turmoil. This will continue until there are "Substantial reductions in the budge deficit, monetary reform, and a fixed exchange rate." (Kiguel 1989) with outright elimination of the deficit being the most important factor.
Trading Diverging Monetary Policies: EURUSD In "The Sweet Spot"There are occasions where central banks policies diverge, either by one being hawkish the other being dovish, or by one being less accommodative while the other leans to provide further easing, in general these diverging moments are cyclical habits of markets, they come in various and actually unlimited ways and tastes, where the divergence of central banks policies is just one example.
These occasions usually provide a great medium term trading opportunities and I like to call it the sweet spots. However; for those opportunities to turn out effective, short term price fluctuations triggered by surprising economic, political or geopolitical inputs should be discarded or ignored, as market will tend to correct itself in line with monetary policy.
Finally, those trading opportunities are mainly applicable under normal market conditions, thus in the times of turmoil and abnormal economic or political events; when the fear factor dominates the scenes markets tend to be irrational and derived by haven demand.
To clarify more; I will illustrate the idea by a potential real time example, the EURUSD:
The ECB: The recent ECB meeting triggered a major sell-off, as the central bank was extremely dovish, decided to be more supportive cutting interest rates, and hinted ready to do more if needed, as the ECB sights risks of deflationary pressures are the main threat to the EU.
On the other hand,
The Federal Reserve: I believe the FED is at the end of its easy policy cycle, the effect of government shutdown wasn't that harmful as earlier expected, jobs data are surprisingly solid within the past months, and the FED had already hinted that its starting tapering soon.
Technically Speaking, the EURUSD has broken its four-month ascending channel, indicating further debasement in the near term, probably towards its main longer term ascending trend line, which if broken may signal further long term downside. Technical notes and targets are outlined on chart.
Happy Trading
twitter.com
thefxchannel.com