Short Sellers: Liquidity Providers or Market Disruptors?█ Understanding Short Sellers: Liquidity Providers or Market Disruptors?
Short sellers often have a controversial reputation, viewed by many as market manipulators who profit from falling stock prices. However, recent research sheds light on an unexpected and valuable role they play: providing liquidity to the market, especially during critical moments like news releases. Let’s break down this concept in a way that’s approachable for everyone while maintaining the insights of the academic findings.
█ What Is Short Selling?
In simple terms, short selling is a trading strategy where an investor borrows shares of a stock, sells them, and hopes to buy them back later at a lower price to pocket the difference. While this might sound straightforward, it’s a high-risk activity because the potential losses are unlimited if the stock price rises instead of falling.
For long-term investors, the goal is usually to buy strong companies that will grow over time, benefiting from compounding returns and supporting broader economic growth. On the other hand, short selling tends to attract risk-seekers who aim to profit from price declines. Unfortunately, many inexperienced short sellers get burned by the complexities of market dynamics, including the balance of supply and demand for liquidity.
█ Why Is Short Selling Important?
Despite the risks, short sellers are essential to the financial markets. They help correct overpriced stocks and bring balance to valuations, contributing to more accurate pricing. Moreover, they provide critical insights during times of market euphoria or uncertainty.
One example of their importance is the role of short sellers during events like the “short squeezes” in GameStop or Volkswagen. These situations occur when a stock’s price skyrockets, often fueled by retail traders or unexpected news, forcing short sellers to buy back shares at higher prices. While dramatic, such events highlight the complex interaction between short selling and market liquidity.
█ A Fresh Perspective: Short Sellers as Liquidity Providers
Traditional thinking often casts short sellers as aggressive traders who demand liquidity—placing orders that consume existing bids or offers in the market. However, a recent study challenges this view, showing that some short sellers do the opposite: they provide liquidity.
Using transaction-level data, the study reveals that informed short sellers strategically supply liquidity by posting and maintaining limit orders. These orders help stabilize markets, especially during volatile periods like news days. This behavior contrasts with the common perception of short sellers as disruptive forces, instead positioning them as contributors to market efficiency.
█ Key Findings from the Research
The research, titled Stealthy Shorts: Informed Liquidity Supply, presents several critical insights:
⚪ Liquidity-Supplying vs. Liquidity-Demanding Short Sales:
Liquidity-supplying short sellers place limit orders, offering to sell shares at specific prices.
Liquidity-demanding short sellers use market orders, which take the best available prices.
The study found that liquidity-supplying short sales are more predictive of future stock returns than liquidity-demanding ones.
⚪ Predictive Power of Liquidity-Supplying Shorts:
Stocks with high levels of liquidity-supplying short sales underperform those with low levels over a 21-day holding period.
This pattern suggests that these short sellers have a long-term informational edge.
⚪ Impact on Price Discovery:
By providing liquidity, these short sellers help narrow bid-ask spreads, making it easier for other investors to enter or exit positions at favorable prices.
⚪ Informed Trading:
Liquidity-supplying short sellers often act on information not yet fully reflected in stock prices. For example, they are particularly active and accurate around news days when fresh information enters the market.
█ Implications for Investors and Regulators
The findings challenge regulators and market participants to rethink their views on short sellers. While short selling is often criticized for its potential to destabilize markets, this study highlights a more nuanced role: informed short sellers contribute to market liquidity and efficiency. For everyday investors, this means that short sellers aren’t just betting against companies but also helping ensure that stock prices reflect their true value over time.
█ Takeaways for Beginners
If you’re new to investing, here’s what you should know:
Short selling is risky and generally not recommended for beginners. The potential for unlimited losses makes it a strategy better suited for experienced traders.
Short sellers play a vital role in financial markets by helping correct mispricings and improving liquidity.
Understanding the mechanics of liquidity supply and demand can provide valuable insights into how markets function.
█ Final Thoughts
This research highlights the dual role of short sellers, particularly the most informed ones, as both traders and market stabilizers. By offering liquidity and acting on long-lived information, these traders help create more efficient markets, benefiting everyone from retail investors to large institutions. As always, a deeper understanding of market dynamics can empower better investment decisions and help you navigate the complexities of the financial world with confidence.
-----------------
Disclaimer
This is an educational study for entertainment purposes only.
The information in my Scripts/Indicators/Ideas/Algos/Systems does not constitute financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on such information.
All investments involve risk, and the past performance of a security, industry, sector, market, financial product, trading strategy, backtest, or individual's trading does not guarantee future results or returns. Investors are fully responsible for any investment decisions they make. Such decisions should be based solely on evaluating their financial circumstances, investment objectives, risk tolerance, and liquidity needs.
My Scripts/Indicators/Ideas/Algos/Systems are only for educational purposes!
Shortsellers
$VRT Head and Shoulders Failure Signal Note: I am LONG NYSE:VRT
A Head and Shoulders failure pattern occurs when prices break below the neckline, suggesting a potential reversal to an up-trend; however, the move lower does not gain traction. Instead, prices drift higher until trading above the previously defined Right Shoulder high.
My long entry triggers when price > right shoulder high, which invalidates the bearish setup, and signals a continuation of the up-trend as trapped short sellers are forced to cover. Often times, this amplifies the momentum in the move higher.
Past performance is not indicative of future results. Opinions are not positions, and vice versa.
SPCE ? Consolidation ? Short Squeeze ?SPCE is at a line in the sand of the chaos of the market.
On the 4H chart, price has bottomed and might be making a reversal pivot
as supported by a rising line segment on the RSI out of the oversold zone.
The though of a reversal is also supported by price crossing over the POC
line of the volume profile. Price above the POC line shows buyers are dominating
although some of the buyers are buying to cover shorts. Below the POC line,
sellers are dominating. If SPCE can get a trajectory upward, a short squeeze
could ignite a launch.
( Fundamentally, SPCE is dying and waiting for Eton Musk to make a good offer.)
This could be worth watching with an alert set 10% above the current price and
a volume alert at 50% above the moving average 20-day volume.
Get ShortyI never heard about The Merchant of Venice before this morning, but the more I read about it, the more Intrigued I became.
The Merchant of Venice is a 16th-century play written by Shakespeare in which a merchant defaults on a loan provided by a Jewish moneylender, Shylock.
For the purpose of brevity I can't go through the play or all its characters in its entirety right now.
The main antagonist, a Shylock is a relentless and revengeful moneylender that embodies greediness and vengefulness.
One could easily mistake Prime Brokers as the Shylock of the Stock Markets, lending out Money through Total Return Swaps (TRS) then dumping massive blocks on the public without any thought of the long term implications of doing so.
Who do you think bought those large blocks of shares in March?
Short Sellers.
Any attempt to make the Prime Brokers held accountable was swept away in a recurring theme that goes back to such notable market bubbles (watch The Big Short) as 2008 and 2000.
I often wonder why nobody was held accountable for the mortgage collapse of 2008 because it seems obvious that it was the short interest played a pivotal role.
The DOJ has finally woke up, but I worry they are going down the wrong rabbit hole
www.reuters.com
Yes the Short Sellers should take some of the blame, but I ask you, are they really the ones responsible for the calamity over the past 2 years?
Is this a pivotal turning point for our black sheep $VIAC?
Somebody doesn't want $LAZR above $35 Over the past few days, there appears to be violent and sudden selling pressure every time LAZR hits the 34.5 to 35 area. This leads me to believe that someone large is short selling the stock right now. It also increases my confidence that this LAZR will take off if any positive news catalyst occurs, forcing shorts to exit their position.
Melvin Capital: the adventures of an infinite size short sellerYet another degenerate bites the dust.
In the markets, there is a once every 100 years 5 sigma event every few months.
Some of you may remember the James Cordier of optionsellers dot com emotional apology video, after he got wiped out by a short squeeze on Natural Gas in 2018.
I looked into it back then and this guy was an out of the money naked option seller using extreme leverage.
These people, that get wiped out, every time they are psychopaths. This time we are looking at stocks, and the guy running Melvin Capital was a madman.
This guy single-handedly shorted between 50 and 100% of Gamestop all available shares. The ADV is ~3.5MM shares which is around 5% roughly.
I do not trade stocks (I do Forex CFDS & CME commodity futures) but I know enough to know shorting all by yourself more shares in percentage than the second highest shorted stock entire short interest, that's asking for trouble. I do not know what limits one should set, as a famous stock expert would say "it depends on your personal risk tolerance", but the adv would be a good place to start maybe? 5% of float seems big but reasonable?
When he shorted CD projekt he only used 0.6% of the outstanding shares according to this article.
Funny thing: they say he did not make as much as he should have because the rate was not favorable. They know this or they are guessing?
The reckless CEO of Melvin did not bother to open an FX position to hedge? He likes to live dangerously, or maybe he was making an FX bet.
www.world-today-news.com
On this page they claim to have a list of stocks Melvin is short of: whalewisdom.com
Reddit found a troll in a very dangerous position, and so they went whale hunting.
But I think it's other institutions that took down the whale actually, and the heroic "little guy" just joined late (as usual) and is now left holding the bag.
Melvin loss was entirely the responsibility of the head manager, risk managers and whoever came up with the idea of shorting more than 50% of shares.
It's always the same story. Before getting wiped out James Cordier published (on another site) a trading idea called "option selling opportunities so good they're scary" and was persuaded he could not lose.
I bet the same happened here. Gabe Plotkin had big success (50% returns, one of the best funds), got lucky and made easy money, got excited (this is the "don't get emotional" part), went in big, and then got punished.
I doubt Gabe Plotkin and James Cordier are excited today.
Ignore the Downgrades, Ride Past Earnings: Super BullishNone of the fundamentals of $HYLN has changed. In my opinion, it is still close to picking up key support levels. $HYLN has already been oversold, and it has low volume into an earnings call that I believe has some high potential. I would say, buy and hold. This stock should be at the very least $25 if it wasn't for the massive market overreaction. I think the neutral points, upcoming resistance + company fundamentals are promising. That said, do your own due diligence and invest at your own risk.