Get started

Solar

ENPH recharged & potential in its explosive upside actionHighlighted previously, two months ago, ENPH exploded 50% to the upside against the major market move. Then it went into a consolidation phase for a month, and it appears to have broken out of a flag pattern. And by pattern projection, there is another potential 25-30% upside to this move. The daily chart shows the breakout and possible engagement point (white arrow) in July. This came with favourable technicals where the MACD and RPM crossed over. A clear consolidation phase started in August and a descending range formed the flag. This week saw the star of an attempt to breakout and yesterday was a major move to the upside with momentum (8% bullish marubozu) and broke out of the flag. Another potential entry point is at breakout point (white arrow). With this, the flag pole (yellow arrow) can be used to project the upside target. At the moment, both the technical indicators RPM and MACD are supportive as they cross over their respective MA lines. Upside target by flag pattern projection is 406. Out of pure interest and curiosity , I wanted to analyze the effect of this Gann box which I recently find interesting. So it was "force fitted" into the price action, where the first 0.25 of the time axis measured the flag pole rally. This fitted to the start of the consolidation flag. The height of the initial rally was set at the 0.5 level. The outcome was rather interesting... at 0.75 of the timeline, spot-on the breakout occurs. and the projected remainder of the 0.5 also approximates the upside target at 420 (as opposed to the flag pole projection at 406) For Gann practitioners, please do enlighten.... thanks in advance!
NASDAQ:ENPHLong
by Auguraltrader
Breakout Trade in CSIQCSIQ is a market leader in today’s #1 sector - solar energy. Shares soared over 60% between July and August as solar stocks came front and center as a leading theme in the market recovery. The 200-day moving average has begun sloping upward, putting CSIQ at the beginning of a new Stage 2 uptrend (see my previous post on the 4 Stages of the Stock Cycle). The pink dots on the relative strength line on top of the chart signal new RS highs being made by CSIQ. In other words, the stock has held up better than the general market over the last couple weeks. I’d like to see Tuesday’s action stay inside of Friday’s range to post a true inside day. If that happens, I will look to buy on a breakout above the Friday candle at 46.25.
NASDAQ:CSIQLong
by rossgivens
ARRY - Array TechnologiesTop notch stock in the best group in the market right now (solar). Holding up well during the recent pullback in the broad market. It won't be able to buck the trend forever, but if the market as a whole begins to bounce or even just stabilize itself, it could allow this (and the other solar stocks) to really take off. The other two solar stocks on my focus list are SHLS & ENPH which arguably have cleaner setups, but the massive growth numbers draw me back to ARRY.
NASDAQ:ARRYLong
by apaqu
The Truth About Trade AccuracyA critical component relating to trading success is the relationship between your win percentage and your bottom line. Many new traders hold some extremely inaccurate views when it comes to what kind of win percentage is required to generate net profit, including the notion they need a 70% or higher win percentage to achieve success. This notion is wrong and misleading. The relationship between your win percentage, your risk management, and the profit you generate from each trade are intricately related. The beauty of this post is that the backtest logic in our Olympus Cloud indicator showcases the concepts covered with real trades, which is shown under this post in the data section. The Positive Win Percentage A win percentage over 50% is regarded as a probable edge or edge. Yet, even with a 60% win rate, you can generate a net loss. How? If your average loss is $100, but you are in the habit of falling prey to your emotions and prematurely selling your winners so you only generate an average of $50 when you win, you will lose money regardless of your 60% win rate. No trader goes into a trade thinking, “Hey, I’ll lose $100 if I’m wrong and I’ll make $50 if I’m correct.” Nevertheless, random wins of $75, $25, $60, $40, $90, and $10 will average out to $50 per win. No one purposely tries to win half of what they lose, but random trading combined with random emotions produces random results. We all desire winning and making good profits when we take a trade, but as emotions come into play, things quickly change. You may take a trade that reaches $75 in profit and then decide the move looks gassed out, so you sell. On another trade, you might get scared by some volatility, or notice a resistance you neglected to spot initially and sell for $25 of profit. It is all too common to fall prey to your emotions and behave in a way you didn’t plan to. The irony is, that you will regard the $25 trade as a winner, and it will raise your trade accuracy. Let’s look at a simple example: Example: 100 total trades with 60% trade accuracy 60 winning trades at an average of $50 per win = $3,000 40 losing trades at an average of $100 per loss = $4,000 Net loss of $1,000 In the example above, your break-even point is a 67% win percentage for a whopping $50 in profit. With this type of random risk and profit management, any meaningful net profit requires a win percentage upwards of 75-80%. The psychological damage of having a higher average loss than an average win is hard to quantify, but it’s easy to feel frustration when one loss wipes out two wins. While this sounds like common sense, many, many new traders fall into the habit of random profit management and find themselves in this undesirable situation. The same theory holds true even if you let your winners play out, but you also let your losses escalate and take a few big hits to your account. In either scenario, your 60% win rate means nothing. The Negative Win Percentage In the case of a negative win percentage, you can produce a net profit even if you are correct less than 50% of the time. In this scenario, your advantage over the market is getting into trades that consistently provide large gains when you win, and by letting those winners play out fully. Furthermore, you can’t hesitate to cut your losses and keep your drawdown controlled. With this kind of win rate, you must not sell early or your entire business model falls apart. You must understand that the big winners will make up for any profit you leave on the table. Let’s look at what happens if you are correct 40% of the time, but your average win is $100 and your average loss is $50: Example: 100 total trades with 40% trade accuracy 40 winning trades at an average of $100 per win = $4,000 60 losing trades at an average of $50 per loss = $3,000 Net gain of $1,000 It is now clear that win percentage is not everything. You can make money even if you are correct on 40% of your trades as long as your average win is double your average loss. The smaller your average win compared to your average loss, the higher your accuracy must be to make a net profit. Of course, if you can maintain a win percentage over 50% while also having proper risk and profit management you will end up far ahead. Putting It Together Clearly, the best approach is to combine a reasonable win percentage of over 50% with proper risk and profit management. You must consistently let your winners play out regardless of the emotions you feel in the moment and ensure you don’t take losses beyond a certain threshold. Furthermore, scaling out of trades – selling portions of your position as the market moves in your favor – will increase your accuracy and ease your mind. By dividing your position into two or three tranches you can lock in a certain amount of profit at predefined targets and then let the final portion ride out the trend with a trailing stop-loss. Revisiting our example, let’s put these concepts together with a reasonable win percentage: Example: 100 total trades with 55% trade accuracy 55 winning trades at an average of $100 per win = $5,500 45 losing trades at an average of $50 per loss = $2,250 Net gain of $3,250 Now, that’s what you want to see! It’s more important you behave in a consistent manner and follow a predefined game plan than it is to have 80% trade accuracy. It is wise to strive for reasonable trade accuracy – 50% to 65% – and remain consistent in order to fulfill your trading potential. After you have mastered your emotions with a consistent strategy, perhaps you can raise your win percentage to mythical values like 80%. As we have covered, though, such accuracy is not required for great trading results.
AMEX:TANEducation
by Level8Trading
1
ENPH Enphase Energy got electric charged!This came up on my screener... ENPH Reading abotut it was intriguing as this was interesting as it develops, manufactures, and sells solar microinverters, energy monitoring software, and battery storage products. Given the expected surge of crude after the current retracement, and the sustainability trend, I find ENPH intriguingly positioned. Technicals flagged it out, having taken some damage since Oct 2021. A triangle formation breakout, and retest appears to have been done and a second breakout (of a trendline) flagged it. The daily technical indicators are turning up to support the breakout. On the news front, apparently solar stocks were given a boost with Biden's announcement where there would not be any new tariffs on solar imports for the next two years. In addition, There was authorization for Defense Production Act to help US manufacturers of solar panels, and it is expected that US solar manufacturing capacity can triple in the next two years. People would need energy management tools! Looks delicious... Potential upside target based on triangle breakout projections put it at 360 in Nov 2022. An interesting proposition seen in this chart.
NASDAQ:ENPHLong
by Auguraltrader
5