Get started
Apple Inc. Stock Price Target Lowered Amid Tariff ConcernsApple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) is trading at $208.37 after climbing 4.32% in the latest session. Despite the recent bounce, analysts have made downward adjustments to its price outlook ahead of the company’s March 2025 quarterly earnings report. UBS analyst David Vogt has revised Apple’s price target from $236 to $210 while maintaining a ‘Neutral’ rating. This adjustment comes in response to anticipated U.S. tariffs and potential pressure on production costs. UBS reported that Apple expedited about one million iPhone shipments during the quarter. This strategy contributed to a modest increase in iPhone revenue, despite flat demand. With the U.S. dollar weakening against major currencies, UBS also raised its March quarter revenue estimate to $95.5 billion, up from $93.5 billion. EPS forecasts were adjusted accordingly. On the other hand, MoffettNathanson Research downgraded its price target from $184 to $141 and reiterated a “Sell” rating. The firm highlighted risks related to trade tensions, increasing manufacturing costs due to tariffs, and slowing innovation. According to their analysis, Apple faces difficult choices—either absorb high tariff costs or reconfigure supply chains at a premium. Both options are expected to affect profitability. Technical Analysis The stock has rebounded from a key support level near $170, which aligns with a long-term demand zone visible on the 3-day chart. It has broken above the 200-day moving average of $192.82 and now trades slightly below the 100-day moving average of $213.53 and 50-day MA at $229.03. Momentum indicators suggest a possible continuation. The RSI stands at 45.67, showing recovering strength. If AAPL holds above $200, it may retest the $197 support level before targeting $260.10. A rejection could lead to a retest of the $170 support area.
NASDAQ:AAPL
by DEXWireNews
$GOOG Possible Demand Zone 155-143 Targeting 178 By earning!One of worst weekly candles and 3 bearish soldiers pattern made it extremely bearish but now entered the demand zone between 155 to 143 expecting accumulation into this range then possible bottom by mid of April then moving higher after earning targeting upper gap but we keep the target more secure by targeting 178 as closing trade. 161-164 is strong resistance . so the idea bye with weakness and accumulate during coming days with stop loss below 140 approx. Earning estimate 1.6 which is a drop from 2.4 last quarter by 30% - P/E at 19.98 EPS at 8.12 - Average analyst rating at 215 (+60$) from last close at 156. these fundamental make this idea is much likely to succeed. Good luck - please like and share . thanks
NASDAQ:GOOGLong
by WinnerTrader99
1
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) Receives Analyst UpgradeMeta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) is set to report first-quarter 2025 results on April 30. Ahead of the release, the stock is trading at $532.16, down over 18% year-to-date. Concerns about a pullback in ad spending and rising AI infrastructure costs had weighed heavily on investor sentiment. However, robust engagement trends and a notably cheaper 16x EV/EBIT valuation have prompted a shift in outlook. The stock has been upgraded from Sell to Hold. Despite macroeconomic challenges and regulatory fines from the EU, analysts maintain a positive long-term view. Benchmark’s Mark Zgutowicz cut his price target to $640 from $820 but reaffirmed a Buy rating. He highlighted Meta’s long-term strength in U.S. digital ad markets and its disciplined capital allocation. Similarly, Stifel’s Mark Kelley reduced his target to $628, citing cautiousness in the e-commerce and subscriptions space. He acknowledged market discomfort reminiscent of the COVID-19 era. Meanwhile, Monness’s Brian White maintained a Buy rating with a $775 target, projecting Q1 revenue of $41.73 billion and earnings of $5.54 per share. Analysts, on average, expect EPS of $5.24 and revenue of $41.3 billion, suggesting double-digit growth. The stock holds a Strong Buy consensus from Wall Street. Out of 46 analysts, 42 rate it Buy, three Hold, and one Sell. The average price target of $705 implies a potential 35.5% upside from current levels. Technical Analysis META has rebounded sharply off a key ascending trendline support that dates back to April 2024. The recent recovery from around $475 coincided with the ascending trendline. The price has been bullish overall, as seen from the 200-day moving average at $408.64. Price is now about to reclaim both the 100-day ($549.11) and 50-day ($601.58) moving averages. The chart indicates a possible near-term pullback followed by a push toward the $740.91 high. Volume is currently at 44.25 million shares, suggesting rising interest.
NASDAQ:METALong
by DEXWireNews
NVDA Recovery in Motion — Bullish Setup BrewingNVDA 6H TECHNICAL ANALYSIS 📈 OVERALL TREND 📈 UPTREND — The chart confirms an early-stage recovery from a key pivot low (April 22), with moderate confidence (4.8%). The structure is forming higher lows, and price is currently above several critical short-term MAs. Trend Score sits at +0.10. 📉RESISTANCE ZONE 🔴 153.1300 — SELL STOPLOSS | PIVOT HIGH 🔴 149.8423 — SELL ORDER 2 🔴 143.18875 — SELL ORDER 1 🎯ENTRIES & TARGETS 🎯 139.8280 — EXIT BUY & TP 4 🎯 127.7263 — BUY ORDER & TP 3 🎯 119.8750 — BUY ORDER & TP 2 | MID PIVOT 🎯 108.5705 — BUY ORDER & TP 1 📈SUPPORT ZONE 🟢 97.0121 — BUY ORDER 1 🟢 89.9455 — BUY ORDER 2 🟢 86.6200 — BUY STOPLOSS | PIVOT LOW ✍️STRUCTURAL NOTES Recent bounce from 86.62 pivot low signals strong bullish interest Key reentry occurred above 97.01, aligning with short-term moving averages All major short-term and mid-range MAs (10–100) are BUY-rated Oscillators mixed: MACD and Ultimate Oscillator lean bullish, while Momentum and Williams %R flash caution Ichimoku Base Line neutral — awaiting trend confirmation Hull MA diverges from other MAs — short-term caution on overheated price 📉TRADE OUTLOOK 📈 Bullish bias toward TP3 @ 127.72 and TP4 @ 139.82 📉 Short-term pullback likely at 108.57 or 119.87 — use dips as potential reentry 🔍 Watch for rejection near 143.18–153.13 to reassess continuation vs correction 🧪STRATEGY RECOMMENDATION CONSERVATIVE TREND FOLLOW: — Entry: 97.01 — TP: 108.57 / 119.87 / 127.72 / 139.82 — SL: Below 86.62 AGGRESSIVE REVERSAL: — Entry: 86.62 (Pivot Low Defense) — TP: 97.01 / 108.57 — SL: Below 83.00 “Discipline | Consistency | PAY-tience™”
NASDAQ:NVDALong
by ProfessorCEWard
Microsoft's Downtrend Poised for Deeper RetracementsMSFT 4D TECHNICAL ANALYSIS 📉 OVERALL TREND 📉 DOWNTREND — Confirmed by the descending pivot structure, cluster of recent lower highs, and bearish rejection from the 430–455 zone. The downtrend is confirmed with a moderately confident score of 23.8%, with a Trend Score of -0.50. 🔴RESISTANCE ZONE 🔴 468.3500 — SELL STOPLOSS | PIVOT HIGH 🔴 455.7494 — SELL ORDER 2 🔴 430.2472 — SELL ORDER 1 🎯ENTRIES & TARGETS 🎯 381.6944 — SELL ORDER & | TP 1 🎯 340.8905 — SELL ORDER & | TP 2 | MID-PIVOT 🎯 310.8399 — SELL ORDER & TP 3 🎯 264.4180 — EXIT SELL & TP 4 🟢SUPPORT ZONE 🟢 253.2621 — BUY ORDER 1 🟢 226.1769 — BUY ORDER 2 🟢 213.4130 — BUY STOPLOSS | PIVOT LOW ✍️STRUCTURAL NOTES Major lower high rejection seen near 455–468 zone—clearly defined by the last bullish failure to break above Recent candles show moderate bullish defense near 380, but unable to create a higher high All key short-term MAs (10–50) are bearish, with crossover confirmation stacking downward Longer-term moving averages (100–200) show mixed signals; short-term selling strength remains dominant Oscillators show mixed-to-weak bearish signals, with MACD and Awesome Oscillator suggesting negative momentum 📉TRADE OUTLOOK 📉 Bearish Continuation Bias with potential downside continuation toward TP3 @ 310.84 and TP4 @ 264.41 📈 Temporary bounce possible at 381.69–340.89 range, but expected to be corrective unless higher highs are confirmed 🔍 Watch for retest and rejection at 430.24 or 455.74 zones to validate reentry setups on the short side 🧪STRATEGY RECOMMENDATION CONSERVATIVE APPROACH (Trend-Following): — Entry: 381.69 (on rejection confirmation) — TP: 340.89 / 310.84 / 264.41 — SL: Above 430.25 AGGRESSIVE REVERSAL PLAY: — Entry: 253.26 (Buy Order) — TP: 310.84 / 340.89 — SL: Below 213.41 “Discipline | Consistency | PAY-tience™”
NASDAQ:MSFTShort
by ProfessorCEWard
ServiceNow Surges 15%+ on Strong Earnings and Analyst UpgradesServiceNow (NYSE: NOW) soared 15.2% to $934.16 by late morning Thursday after releasing strong Q1 2025 results. At the same time, the S&P 500 gained 1.2% and the Nasdaq Composite rose 1.7%. The company posted adjusted earnings per share of $4.04, outperforming analysts’ forecast of $3.83. Revenue came in at $3.09 billion, meeting consensus expectations and surpassing ServiceNow’s internal guidance. The software firm recorded a 19% year-over-year increase in revenue, mainly driven by growth in subscription sales. This segment contributed $3 billion, reflecting continued customer demand for cloud-based workflow automation services. ServiceNow also raised its full-year performance targets, signaling confidence in sustained growth throughout 2025. The stock has rebounded sharply after recent market weakness. Its current price of $934.16 reflects renewed investor confidence as the company continues to deliver steady top- and bottom-line expansion. Volume during the session reached 7.31 million shares, well above average. Technical Analysis Technically, NYSE:NOW bounced from the support zone around $700, aligned with the 200-day moving average of $707.13. ServiceNow respected this level and reclaimed its 100-day ($865.17) moving average. A steep ascending trendline confirms long-term bullish momentum and support since late 2022. The surge suggests a possible retest of the previous all-time high at $1,198.09. Price action may consolidate around the $1,000 psychological mark before advancing. Volume spikes during the rally indicate strong buying interest. The technical setup signals a continuation of the uptrend, with bulls targeting a return to historical highs. As long as the price stays above trendline support, the horizontal support, and key moving averages, the uptrend remains intact.
NYSE:NOWLong
by DEXWireNews
Tesla Suspends Guidance: Why Its Forecasts Were Often WrongTesla Pulls the Plug on Guidance: Why Its Forecasts Weren't Worth Much Anyway Tesla, the electric vehicle behemoth that has captivated and often confounded investors for over a decade, has made another move guaranteed to stir debate: it's suspending its forward-looking guidance. For many companies, withdrawing financial forecasts signals significant uncertainty or a major strategic shift, often sending shares tumbling. While Tesla's stock undoubtedly reacts to such news, a deeper look reveals a compelling argument: Tesla's official guidance, particularly in recent years, had become such a moving target, so frequently untethered from eventual reality, that its predictive value was already deeply questionable. Suspending it might simply be acknowledging the obvious. For years, Tesla's earnings calls and investor communications were punctuated by ambitious, often audacious, targets set by CEO Elon Musk and the company. These weren't just vague aspirations; they were often specific numbers for vehicle deliveries, production ramps, timelines for new technologies like Full Self-Driving (FSD), and launch dates for anticipated models like the Cybertruck or the Semi. The market, enthralled by Tesla's disruptive potential and Musk's charismatic pronouncements, frequently hung on these words, baking them into valuation models and trading strategies. However, the history of Tesla meeting these self-imposed targets is, charitably speaking, inconsistent. The guidance often veered into the quixotic, reflecting a potent blend of extreme optimism, engineering ambition, and perhaps a dash of Musk's famed "reality distortion field." Consider the infamous "production hell" of the Model 3 ramp-up. Initial targets were wildly optimistic, projecting volumes that the company struggled immensely to achieve, facing bottlenecks in battery production and assembly line automation. While Tesla eventually overcame these hurdles, the timeline and cost deviated significantly from early guidance. Similarly, the promise of Full Self-Driving has been a perennial "next year" phenomenon. While the capabilities of Tesla's Autopilot and FSD Beta have advanced significantly, the arrival of true Level 4 or 5 autonomy, capable of operating without driver supervision under virtually all conditions – as often implied by the timelines suggested in guidance – remains elusive, years behind schedules hinted at in past forecasts. The Cybertruck provides another stark example. Unveiled in 2019 with a projected start date that came and went multiple times, its eventual, limited launch in late 2023 was years behind schedule, and scaling its unique manufacturing process remains a challenge. Guidance around its ramp-up has been adjusted repeatedly. This pattern isn't necessarily born from deliberate deception, but rather from a confluence of factors inherent to Tesla's DNA and the volatile industries it operates in: 1. Aggressive Goal Setting: Musk is known for setting incredibly ambitious "stretch goals" intended to motivate teams to achieve breakthroughs. While effective internally, translating these aspirational targets directly into public financial guidance is fraught with risk. 2. Underestimation of Complexity: Bringing revolutionary products to mass market – whether it's a new vehicle platform, a complex software suite like FSD, or novel battery technology – involves navigating unforeseen engineering, manufacturing, supply chain, and regulatory hurdles. Initial guidance often seemed to underestimate these complexities. 3. Market Volatility: The EV market itself is dynamic. Consumer demand shifts, government incentives change, raw material costs fluctuate, and competition intensifies – all factors that can derail even well-laid plans and render guidance obsolete. 4. The "Musk Factor": Elon Musk's public statements, sometimes made spontaneously on social media or during earnings calls, often became de facto guidance, even if not formally enshrined. His optimism could inflate expectations beyond what the operational side of the business could reliably deliver on a set schedule. Given this history, why did the market continue to pay such close attention? Part of it was the sheer scale of Tesla's ambition and its undeniable success in revolutionizing the automotive industry. Investors betting on disruption were often willing to overlook missed targets, focusing instead on the long-term vision. Past stock performance also created a feedback loop; as the stock soared despite missed guidance, it reinforced the idea that the specific numbers mattered less than the overall trajectory and narrative. Guidance served as a signal of intent and ambition, even if the execution timeline slipped. However, the context has shifted dramatically. Tesla is no longer the lone wolf in a nascent EV market. Competition is fierce, particularly from Chinese automakers like BYD, but also from legacy manufacturers finally hitting their stride with compelling EV offerings. Global EV demand growth, while still present, has slowed from its previously exponential pace. Tesla itself has engaged in significant price cuts globally to maintain volume, putting pressure on its once-stellar automotive margins. In this more challenging environment, the luxury of consistently missing ambitious targets wears thin. The decision to suspend guidance now can be interpreted in several ways: • Pragmatic Realism: Management may genuinely lack visibility into near-term demand, production capabilities (especially with new models or processes), or the impact of macroeconomic factors. Suspending guidance is arguably more responsible than issuing forecasts they have low confidence in. • Strategic Pivot: Tesla is increasingly emphasizing its future potential in AI, robotics (Optimus), and autonomous ride-sharing (Robotaxi). These ventures have even longer and more uncertain development timelines than vehicle production. Focusing investor attention away from quarterly delivery numbers might be part of a strategy to reframe the company's narrative around these future bets. • Avoiding Accountability: A more cynical take is that suspending guidance removes a key benchmark against which management's performance can be judged, particularly during a period of slowing growth and heightened competition. Regardless of the primary motivation, the practical implication for investors is clear: the already thin reed of Tesla's official guidance is now gone entirely. This forces a greater reliance on analyzing tangible results – actual deliveries, reported margins, cash flow generation, progress on FSD adoption rates, and demonstrable advancements in new ventures – rather than promises of future performance. The suspension underscores that investing in Tesla requires a strong belief in its long-term vision and its ability to execute on extremely complex technological and manufacturing challenges, often without a clear, company-provided roadmap for the immediate future. The focus must shift from parsing guidance to meticulously evaluating performance, competitive positioning, and the plausibility of its next-generation bets. In conclusion, Tesla's decision to stop issuing formal guidance is less of a shockwave and more of a formal acknowledgment of a long-standing reality. Its forecasts were often more aspirational than operational, reflecting a culture of ambitious goal-setting within a highly volatile industry. While the absence of guidance introduces a new layer of uncertainty, savvy investors likely already applied a significant discount factor to Tesla's projections. The company's future success now hinges more transparently than ever not on what it promises for tomorrow, but on what it demonstrably delivers today. The quixotic forecasts may be gone, but the fundamental challenge of execution remains.
NASDAQ:TSLA
by bryandowningqln
If BTC Crashes, MSTR Has No Bottom Although I regularly have made bear forecasts on various things, I've never made a forecast of something going to zero (or as good as) before. It's something that's outside the scope of what my strategies are designed to do. They're based on trend development ideas and actually I generally tend to get fairy bullish in tight zones on things when they are around 75% down. When I make bear forecasts I generally make them with no regard given to what happens after they hit or to be bullish after they hit. MSTR finds itself in the unique position of being the only stock I've ever made this forecast on (Maybe the only one I ever will) because it is apparent to me based on reading the 8-K for MSTR that if BTC were to make a technical break and follow the downtrend cycle implied by that, the situation Saylor has created makes it almost impossible MSTR doesn't go bust. Or, more likely, they find some way to bail themselves out at the cost of the investors - like Saylor did in 2000. Another thing you don't see me doing often is going out my way to talk bad about people. I'm just not that into it. But Saylor ... is an exception. Saylor is the bubble man! Now, look - if you're into BTC, forget that for a second. I'm talking about Saylor. He has a history of doing something very specific - hopping onto a hype train, leveraging up to the max, encouraging others to take all in risk and seeing massive crashes in the stock if the bet wasn't right. On March 20, 2000, MicroStrategy's stock price plummeted by a staggering 62% in a single day, falling from $226.75 to $86.75. This was one of the most dramatic single-day collapses of the dot-com era. The stock continued to fall in the subsequent days and weeks. Saylor is a high roll gambler playing games to get his bankroll. And the way Saylor has structured the MSTR bet makes it very hard to see any way the company could survive (without some kinda investor slaying event) a sustained downturn in Bitcoin. I've seen videos of Saylor saying things like "If BTC went to $1 we'd just buy all the Bitcoin". Compared to what is in their 8-K, this is outright lies. There is almost zero chance MSTR would be able to sustain its position in Bitcoin under $15,000 if it stayed there some time. The difference between $15,000 and $1 is a lot. MSTR's bet does not give it an exact "Liquidation price", as such. It's not like if BTC hit $14,999 the company would fail. But this idea they'd just be "Buying all the Bitcoin" is outright lies. Because in this situation, MSTR would have no money. The way MSTR plans to raise money is selling MSTR stock at prices higher than it is now. If Bitcoin dropped and MSTR dropped, this would be far less attractive to do. The alternative is to raise funds from somewhere else (increase leverage)- but this could be hard to source in such an environment. When the bubble boy is out of his natural environment of dreamland markets, he's not as popular. Not buying all the BTC won't make MSTR go bust - what the problem would be as time went on is they have repayments they have to make on the debt they've accumulated. MSTR has three options how to pay this. Sell stock (Previously discussed), borrow money (take on more debt) or sell Bitcoin (At a major loss). That's their options. They should have another one. The other option should be "Make money with the tech company" - but if you go to the weekly chart on MSTR and zoom out, you'll see they've never done that. MSTR is one of the worst performing tech stocks of all time - and in their 8-K they say they're not making money from that business. MSTR only went up when Saylor latched onto the hype of BTC and began to deploy a leveraged bet. That for the second time in history began a sustained MSTR rally, the last one being when he did the same thing (Plus some accounting fraud) to run up the stock in the dot com bubble which then would slam and not recover until the new hype train in 2021. I mentioned $15,000 as a bad price for MSTR. Realistically, I found it'd be unlikely MSTR can do well with BTC under 30K for a sustained period of time. Even if it crashed and then just ranged there for a few years, this would be very troublesome for MSTR. They'd have a lot of payments to make in that time with no money. Their avenues to make money shut down. The tech company that never made money would probably be managing to under perform its terrible track record - perhaps redundant because of AI - the stock price would be in the gutter and all the people who'd be interested in lending to a guy like Saylor to do what he did would probably be quite cash strapped. Or wary. This isn't even an isolated risk. It's not even the case you can say "If BTC goes to $10,000 and stays there for 3 years before it goes to $150,000, MSTR will struggle". If it goes to $150,000, MSTR will just leverage up and up the price at which they'd enter into this situation of having known payments to make and no known way to generate the money to pay them other than selling BTC. Which since they would be progressively increasing their average price on that - would also always be at a big loss if sold into a downturn. All of this assumes that Saylor can easily sell as much BTC when he wants to and that not causing an issue. In the example of BTC trading in a range under30K for a while, our example assumes Saylor can sell BTC to cover costs and BTC remains in the range. Which might not be what happens. Given it's public knowledge when Saylor needs to make these repayments, and given it's public knowledge they have no means of making money - might not this lead to speculation? If the market knows Saylor is going to sell, might it not front run it? Might investors and speculators not panic? The idea of "Reflexivity" basically says that once things are in motion they will tend to feed upon themselves. Creating positive feedback loops. Good things breed good things. An example of this would be a stock rising makes it easier for the company to raise money and with more money they can make more money. Positive feedback loop. But this same idea works the same in reverse, and the negative feedback loop for MSTR is blatantly obviously to see - so much so that I think it's inevitable if the "Risk move" in BTC EVER happens - MSTR will likely go bust. But as I keep saying, there are ways MSTR can survive - it just means the investors are screwed. They can convert debt into stock. Maybe they'll find buyers for stock. Perhaps selling their Bitcoin can save the company at the cost of the share price. None of them would be good for investors. And these are the only things they could do. MSTR have taken a super aggressive bet. They've done it in a fancy way but they've basically used starting leverage and then the leverage of running profits to increasingly build a position into an uptrend. When you take the ideology out of this, all this is doing is super aggressively pyramiding into a trend with no trailing stops. I can tell you what has to happen to your position when there's a bigger than expected pullback when that happens! And, in this one rare case, I can tell you if that happened in BTC I see no logical way to believe MSTR does not go to zero, or as good as. Saylor is an incredibly irresponsible man. He has set up a situation where anything outside of the flawless bull trend over time he expects happens his company is almost certain to go bust. And then he presents himself as the modern day investing Jesus to young and naive people with no market experience - telling them to take as much risk as they can too. Saylor, hopefully in jest, suggests "Sell a Kidney if you must". I'd recommend he "Rent a brain if he can". Saylor is an all in gambler. That's the truth of the man.
NASDAQ:MSTRShort
by holeyprofit
6
Acadia Healthcare Company | ACHC | Long at $21.98Acadia Healthcare's NASDAQ:ACHC stock has fallen nearly -76% in a year, primarily due to weak 2024 results, missed revenue and EPS expectations, and a soft 2025 revenue guidance. Ongoing federal investigations into billing practices and lawsuits have further eroded investor confidence. However, it is currently trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of 7.42x and earnings are forecast to grow 7.07% per year. The profitable company is trading at a good value compared to other healthcare companies. Debt-to-equity is relatively low (0.64x), but legal risks (DOJ probe, lawsuits) strain margins. The stock has entered my "major crash" simple moving average territory and there is a lot of downward / selling pressure. But, more often than not, this area (which... I caution... still extends down near $16) can often signal a temporary or longer-term bottom. Personally, this is a buy area ($16-$21) even if it turns into a short-term bounce in 2025. But I believe the overall market moves in the S&P 500, etc. will guide this stock more than anything at this point (unless more bad news about the company emerges). One thing to note is that there are open price gaps on the daily chart near $17, $10, and $8. These gaps, which often (but not always) get closed in the lifetime of a stock, are a potential signal for further declines - at least at some point. There could be a drop near $16, then a $10-$20 bullish price increase after that, followed by more declines (trapping investors). Time will tell, but NASDAQ:ACHC is currently attractively valued. From a technical analysis standpoint, it is in a personal "buy zone", even if purely for a swing trade. Targets: $27.00 $33.00 $39.00
NASDAQ:ACHCLong
by WorthlessViews
GOOGL | Long | Strong Fundamentals | (April 2025)GOOGL | Long | Strong Fundamentals + Technical Support | (April 2025) 1️⃣ Insight Summary: Google (GOOGL) is showing strong fundamental performance with healthy earnings, a growing outlook, and a technically supportive zone. It’s currently sitting at $159, and based on both macro trends and chart structure, there’s potential for a move higher. 2️⃣ Trade Parameters: Bias: Long Entry: Around $159 Stop Loss: $140 TP1: $160 ✅ (light partial) TP2: $200 ✅ (major target) Ultimate Target: $250 🏁 Partial Exits: 25% at each target level to manage risk and lock in gains. 3️⃣ Key Notes: 🔹 Fundamentals are solid: Google has a net income of $100B and EPS around $8, with a growing outlook. 🔹 Dividend yield is modest at 0.51%, but it's backed by $28B in debt and strong cash flow. 🔹 Technically, GOOGL is trading in a supportive zone and could revisit previous highs around $200+. 🔹 Market cap sits at $2T, showing investor confidence. 🔹 Watch the broader market (e.g., SPX, NQ) for sentiment shifts that could impact tech stocks. 4️⃣ Follow-up: Will review this trade setup and update if price approaches $200 or reacts at key levels. Please LIKE 👍, FOLLOW ✅, SHARE 🙌 and COMMENT ✍ if you enjoy this idea! Also share your ideas and charts in the comments section below! This is best way to keep it relevant, support us, keep the content here free and allow the idea to reach as many people as possible. Disclaimer: This is not a financial advise. Always conduct your own research. This content may include enhancements made using AI.
NASDAQ:GOOGLong
by Risk_Adj_Return
NVDIA Short to T1 2 Setups here. - Both T1 and T2 will be hit as part of my price return to zero system (inflexion points). - I'm shorting to T1 first and then reverse into long for T2. If it heads to T2 first I'll simply stay in my original T1 short for the duration. It is of course easy to say that this will either go up or down :-). My system defines targets and there is no rules to say that can only produce a target in one direction. Based on what I see I know with around 95% accuracy that it will hit both with a reasonable timescale. I just don't know which one comes first :). Either way I'm shorting to T1 in the first instance. It may hit T2 first but that doesn't bother my trading as I still expect T1. I won't go down the route of a martingale to T! if it goes to T2 first!! that's just asking for trouble regardless of confidence levels!
NASDAQ:NVDAShort
by dru_01
4