BULLISH SETUP ON HY-IG SPREAD EMERGING. (BEARISH EQUITIES)Back in November of 2022 I wrote about using the HY-IG spread as a potential indicator of 'risk on' vs. 'risk off' sentiment and I will insert that below for readers trying to understand how this spread differential can be utilized. Subsequently I will explain what I currently see emerging on the above chart with the addition of both the RSI and correlation indicators to provide a more robust and predictive analysis than using the HY-IG options adjusted spread alone.
Written November 2022 - 'When the spread between High-Yield (HY) debt and Investment Grade (IG) debt contracts or expands, this can be perceived as the market demanding more or less compensation for the risk it perceives to be present in owning the HY debt against the IG corporate debt. (HY-IG) = Risk On/Risk Off market sentiment.
Generally speaking HY debt a.k.a. Junk Debt, is considered more risky than IG debt. Because of this increased risk, the market demands a higher yield for taking on HY debt, also known as a ‘risk premium’ or ‘premium’ over the alternative investment opportunities the market provides.
This yield premium on HY/JunkBonds can be viewed as ‘extra incentive’ for bids to take on the ‘riskier debt’. When this spread (white) contracts, we can see that the market (yellow) has a tendency to go up (risk on) and when the spread (white) expands we can see the market (white) has a tendency to go down (risk off). This is only one of many indicators I use to gauge ‘market risk sentiment’ and I thought I would share it.' (I have included the link to this piece for reference at the bottom of the page and please excuse the extra charting as I was new to the platform at the time and included the second chart and indicators, but the words remain the same.)
Now that the fundamental use case of the HY-IG spread is explained we can dive in to the current situation. As we can see the HY-IG spread called the late October2023 bottom in the AMEX:SPY (orange), as the spread peaked, the broader equity markets found their bottom. This is not always as direct and their is often a bit of a latency where equities will begin to trend upward before the spread peaks due to the forward looking nature of equity markets, however in October of 2023 the spread nailed the bottom.
As of today, February 27th, 2024, the HY-IG spread has made a 'lower low' down to 2.27 which gives us a bullish price to RSI divergence on the HY-IG options adjusted spread. The HY-IG spread has made a 'lower low' while the RSI is still printing 'higher lows'. In this particular instance, a bullish divergence on the HY-IG spread could signal a bearish sentiment for broader equity markets ( AMEX:SPY ) at some point over the next 4 to 6 weeks which is the normal time latency between a peak or trough in the options adjusted spread and the time it takes to show up in the price action of equity markets. This divergence theory would be invalidated with an RSI reading below 25 by the HY-IG spread. A reading below 25 would make a lower low on the RSI and would invalidate any divergence.
Finally we can look at the correlation (bottom indicator) and see that HY-IG is inversely correlated to the broader equity markets as represented by AMEX:SPY at (-0.92) over the last twenty trading days and has maintained a relatively consistent and significant inverse correlation to AMEX:SPY over the majority of the last year. While I did not include the tech laden NASDAQ:QQQ on the chart, the inverse correlation is still very significant at (-0.87) at the time I am writing this article. This assumes 'corollary significance' is achieved at a greater than or equal to (0.62) level.
Given the further contraction in the options adjusted spread down to the 2.27 level, its possible we have a bit more upside room to run in equities, however, assuming the RSI divergence holds with 'higher lows', it's unlikely that we don't see a move to the upside in the HY-IG spread over the next 4 to 6 weeks, which is generally a bearish signal for equities markets. I hope you enjoyed this piece and I welcome any feedback or suggestions you might have so that I might improve further articles. Thank you for reading and happy trading!
Economy
Macro Monday 35~Richmond Fed Manufacturing and Services IndexMacro Monday 35
Richmond Fed Manufacturing and Services Index
(Released Tuesday 27th Feb 2024 @ 15:00 GMT or 9:00 CT)
The Richmond Manufacturing and Services Indexes measures the conditions of each respective industry for the 5th Federal Reserve District which covers the District of Columbia (Washington DC), Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and most of West Virginia. Both the indexes are derived from surveys conducted each month of relevant businesses in each respective industry.
▫️ The Richmond Manufacturing Index survey focuses on questions related to production, new orders, employment, prices, capacity utilization, and future expectations within the manufacturing sector.
▫️ The Richmond Services Index survey, on the other hand, asks questions about business activity, new business, employment, prices, inventory, capital expenditures, and future expectations within the service sector.
While the specific questions and data points might differ between the surveys, the basic structure and methodology for calculating the diffusion indices remain consistent;
The Chart
You can see that the green zone is expansionary and the red zone is contractionary.
At present Manufacturing (blue line) is in fairly deep contraction at -15 and whilst Services (red line) has recovered from -22 (Apr 2023) to +4 (Jan 2024).
Reading the Chart:
🟢Above 0 is expansionary (green zone)
🔴Below 0 is contractionary (red zone)
Historic Recession Patterns
I have highlighted some patterns on the chart (orange) which demonstrate that historically when Services and Manufacturing declined for a period of between 27 and 45 months a recession can follow such declines. Importantly there was a period of decline in from Apr 2010 – Dec 2013(45 months) which did not result in a recession. During this period Services remained elevated and only fell marginally into contractionary territory for brief spells (which could be a tell of some buoyancy in the market during this period). At present we are 32 months into a general decline in both manufacturing and services. Services have been on the incline since Apr 2023 and recently moved into expansionary territory at +4 in Jan 2024 which is promising and may indicate the beginning of a trend change, however until manufacturing follows this trajectory I believe we are still at risk of repeating history. Manufacturing is down at -15 at present and needs to start as sustainable recovery into expansionary territory. It has remained more a less in contractionary territory since Apr 2022.
Why even consider the Richmond Fed index?
I think the best way to outline the utility of the Richmond Fed is to compare it to the Dallas Fed Index which will be released later today (Monday). I have covered the Dallas Fed on a previous Macro Monday (link will be in the comments) and I will update you on this index when it is released later today also.
Both the Richmond Manufacturing Index and the Dallas Fed Manufacturing Index are valuable indicators of regional manufacturing activity, each offering unique insights.
Dallas Fed Index focuses on a major economic manufacturing hub – Texas
(An estimated 14.4 million people are employed in the state of Texas)
The Dallas Fed Manufacturing Index covers manufacturing activity mainly in the state of Texas. The state of Texas ranks 2nd only to California in factory production & comes in at 1st as an exporter of manufactured goods, thus Texas is an important state for gauging manufacturing & production in the U.S. economy (not services is not included here). Texas also contributes an incredible c.10% towards the U.S. Manufacturing gross domestic product making the index an important metric to consider towards potential GDP trends in the U.S. So, the Dallas Fed is very good at gauging manufacturing in the U.S. simply because of the volume of manufactured goods from the region. Whilst the Dallas Fed Index focuses on a high volume of manufacturing activity and production within the state of Texas, it also specifically focuses on durable goods industries like aerospace, energy, and technology whilst the Richmond Index below is much more diversified in terms of its manufacturing industries, its services sector and regionally diverse.
Richmond Index focuses on more economically diverse regions (inclusive of a large services sector)
(An estimated 23 - 25 million people are employed in the fifth federal reserve district)
This Richmond Index covers the Fifth Federal Reserve District, encompassing an incredibly diverse range of industries across six states. Its difficult to portray the expansive array of various manufacturing and services within these regions but I will try. This index goes far beyond the specific performance of durable goods in an isolated state like Texas and reflects manufacturing and services health across various sectors and regions. It offers economists a broader picture of manufacturing health in the U.S. compared to indices focused on specific industries or regions.
To give you an idea of the diverse ranges here:
In Washington DC you have a major corporate & services hub; think Accenture, Deloitte, KPMG, Capital One) combined with tech and comms center with the likes of Amazon web services, Verizon Communications & General Dynamics. You obviously have a strong political and legal presence in this region also.
Maryland, Virginia and North Carolina appear to have a very strong healthcare dynamic with the likes of Bon Secours Mercy Health System, VCU Health System, Duke University Health System and Atrium Health. Baltimore in Maryland has the Johns Hopkins Hospital and Health System employing over 40,000 employees. All these states appear to have strong university presences also (offering education employment and services) which likely supply the necessary expertise for the medical manufacturing and services that are present across these states.
South Carolina is known for having one of the major three Boeing aircraft manufacturing facilities and is also known the manufacturing of Michelin tires.
Across all six states you have a rich and diverse farming and forestry industry, food production facilities and waste productions plants.
Walmart, Home Depot, Target and Amazon are also present across all these states.
You can clearly see why the Richmond Fed offers a more nuanced and complex picture of the U.S. manufacturing and services economy. This diversity in sectors, regions and employment demographic gives us a different insight against the more centralized manufacturing hub contained in Texas under Dallas Fed Index. Furthermore, in terms of employment the six states included in the Richmond Fed Index is approx. 24 million versus the approx. 14.4 million employed in the state of Texas (under the Dallas fed Index). Both indexes are very valuable and should both be equally considered in our assessments of the U.S. economy.
Thanks for coming along and learning about the chart history on the Richmond Fed Index, the historic trends and the combined utility of both the Dallas and Richmond Fed Index .
PUKA
FEDFUND vs SPX vs BitcoinHello,
Looks like Federal fund rates are going to be in uptrend (Double Bottom + Bullish Divergence in RSI), in the past from 1958 to somewhere around till 1980 SPX was in sideways move or economic decline.
Can we see something similar kind of movement in SPX?
IMO yes.
So, will Bitcoin follow SPX?
IMO Bitcoin also moves in sideways, or Bitcoin is risk on asset so may make lower lows.
The ECB balance sheet vs the FEDThe head of the European Central Bank #ECB Madame Lagarde claims the #ECB is at a different point in time to the Federal Reserve #FED. She claims it is premature to talk about winding down the Quantitative Easing (#QE) as the Fed has indicated a schedule to roll back liquidity. The graph indicates otherwise interestingly the EUD USD liquidity indicates the Fed continues to fund the ECB balance sheet therefore QE inflation has no end during 2022.
Inflation is not going to go awayI posted in March 2020 that we had likely seen a generational low in yields following the spike driven by Covid fears.
We are now STILL in the early innings of a generational (at least 20 years) BULL market for inflation and yields
Position accordingly over coming years
INFLATION REBOUND ?Consumer Confidence vs INFLATION
The Red Phase was the fall of the CC which lead the Inflation data fall.
-> Of course, when consumers doesn't trust the market, spending fall.
The Yellow Phase describes the effect of the CC falling: IF FALL.
As leading indicator, the rebound of CC show the expansion which is represented by the Green Phase.
-> As we can see, as soon as CC take points, the Inflation rebound too. Not like 2008, this time, CC took 30pts.
⚠️I envisaged a continuation of the fall of the Inflation data but a big chance of rebound in the Inflation.
Moreover, the last seen consolidation of the inflation and the rebound of the CC at the pic of the Inflation is worrying.
We see Strong Economic datas even showing signs of expansion. This delay between inflation and CC has not been that big during 2008.
At the first rate cut there is a big chance of explosion of the Inflation as seen in 2006/2008 or pre-covid. ⚠️
Improved CPI, but Market Collapse – What is Happening?Just about 1.5 years ago, inflation reached the highest point in recent decades. The January inflation number for 2024 was released on February 13th. Its CPI has improved from 3.4% for December to 3.1%. However, the major US stock indices collapsed more than 1% on the same day. Why is there such nervousness surrounding improved inflation, and what are its implications?
Mirco E-minin Dow Jones Futures & Options
Outright: 1.0 index points = $0.50
Symbol code: MYM
Disclaimer:
• What presented here is not a recommendation, please consult your licensed broker.
• Our mission is to create lateral thinking skills for every investor and trader, knowing when to take a calculated risk with market uncertainty and a bolder risk when opportunity arises.
CME Real-time Market Data help identify trading set-ups in real-time and express my market views. If you have futures in your trading portfolio, you can check out on CME Group data plans available that suit your trading needs www.tradingview.com
Macro Monday 20 ~ The Philly Fed IndexMacro Monday 20
Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index
While the Philly Fed Manufacturing Index (PFMI) is a regional report generated from surveys in Philadelphia, New Jersey, and Delaware by the Federal Reserve Bank, it is particularly useful as it provides an advance indication of the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) report which is released up to a week after the PFMI (the PMI surveys the entire US whilst the PFMI only surveys the regions mentioned above).
The Philly Fed Index is released this Thursday 16th November 2023 and will provide an advance indication as to what to expect from the PMI released Friday 24th November 2023. Both are a review the prior months survey data, October 2023.
The PFMI index dates back to 1968 and is similar to the PMI, the Federal Reserve completes surveys and asks businesses about new orders, shipments, employment, inventories and general business activity, prices paid, prices received, capital expenditures as well as future expectations for business.
A reading= 0 is stagnation
<0 = contraction
>0 = expansion
The current reading is -9 so we are contractionary territory. We did fall as low as -31.3 on the April 2023 release.
The Chart
The main indications from the chart are as follows:
The Orange Zone
▫️ When the PFMI remains in the orange zone for >10 months it has always coincided with a Recession
- We are in presently in this zone 16 months with 2 brief monthly jumps out of it. I think its safe to say we are 10 months+ in the orange zone which historically has always coincided with a recession.
The Red Zone
▫️All Recessions confirmed a reading below -22 on the PFMI (this is below the red line into the red zone on the chart)
- In April 2023 we hit a low of -31.3 which is well into the red zone (sub -22). We have since risen above the neutral 0 level to high of +12 in Aug 2023 however we have since fallen back down into the -13.5 (Sept) and -9 (Oct). The Nov Release is due this Thursday 16th Nov (and is actually the reading for Oct - released in Nov)
Are we already in a mild Recession?
You can see that in March 1970 we reached a similar PFMI level of -31.3, the same level as in April 2023 (there is a dashed red line to illustrate this on the chart). March 1970 was the middle of the 1969-70 Recession which was a mild recession that ran for 11 months from Dec 1969 – Nov 1970. Whilst it was a mild recession as to its impact on the general economy, there was till a 34% decline in the S&P500.
The 1969-70 Recession has many similarities to some of our current economic predicaments, with the main factors leading to the 1970 recession being tighter monetary policy, rising oil prices, rising inflation, and slowing growth in Europe and Asia. Sound familiar?
From Jan – Apr 2023 the Unemployment Rate was at the lowest levels seen since back in 1969 (at 3.4%). For 8 months (Sept 1968 – May 1969) the unemployment rate was down at 3.4%. We reached this level in January 2023 and oscillated there until April 2023 (only 4 months). Since then the Unemployment rate has risen sharply from 3.5% to 3.9% (July – Oct 2023). Interestingly, this move in the unemployment rate from 3.5% to 3.9% also happened from Dec 1969 to Jan 1970 and marked the start of the recession. Could this be an indicator that we stepped into a recession In July 2023? The orange zone and red zone on the chart are triggering a confirmation nod of a recession. During the recession of 1969-70 the unemployment rate topped at 6.08% in Nov 1970, this is something we have not seen yet however we seem to be trending upwards in that direction. Queue the 8th Dec 2023, the next Bureau of Labor Statistics Unemployment date release.
The 1968-70 period was also burdened with high inflation with YOY CPI increasing from 2% - 6% in the 26 month period from Oct 1967 – Dec 1969. Similarly over a 25 month period from May 2020 – June 2022 CPI increased from 0% to 9.08%. The timeline of the 1969-70 inflation is quite similar, not exactly the same rate increase or timeline but similar all the same. Since June 2022 the CPI has come down to 3.7% as of Sept 2023.
There are some broader similarities between the late 1960’s and early 1970’s to present day, the Vietnam war was raging and was receiving significant funding from the US government with many bills passed in support of the war effort. There was also significant poverty issues in the states as the war dragged on, and the awareness of money being spent on it was creating social discourse on the topic. Whilst the current situation of funding towards the Ukraine and Palestine conflicts is obviously very different, a similar awareness and disapproval is present as many domestic states are suffering with poverty. US President Johnson summarised the late 60’s quiet well in a 1966 speech stating that the nation could afford to spend heavily on both national security and social welfare — “both guns and butter”, as the old saying goes. Only in today’s circumstances only one of these seem to still be taking priority and it isn’t butter.
I believe todays chart and post demonstrates a few things, that there is a high probability that we are already in a recession as of July 2023, however on a positive note the period we find ourselves in has many similarities to 1969-70 period, where the recession was a very bearable and mild one. With some luck, unemployment might top at 6.08% within 9 or 10 months like in 1970 and we will see a correction no greater than -34% on the S&P500 eventually. We already survived a 25% S&P500 decline from Dec 21 – Sept 2022. Minus 34% from our recent $4,580 high would put the S&P500 at approx. $3,000.
Obviously there are no guarantees of any of these scenarios playing out, but at present we are certainly playing to the same tune as the 1969-70 period.
PUKA
Also estimating GB IR going down :)Esteemed colleagues and discerning investors,
As we gather to deliberate on the trajectory of our financial endeavors, let us turn our attention to the chart that unfolds before us. This graph is not merely a collection of lines and oscillations—it is the pulse of the market, the heartbeat of commerce, the very rhythm of our economic aspirations.
Observe the vibrant fluctuations, the ebb and flow of value that defies the flat line of stagnation. Here we see a recent descent, a modest humbling from previous heights, which speaks to the cautious prudence that underlies our most strategic decisions.
The red and green arrows, much like the hands of a compass, point to a divergence in paths, a moment of decision. The red arrow, descending sharply, may initially stir a flutter of concern, a hint of the bearish sentiment that tempers exuberance with sobriety. Yet, juxtaposed with this is the green arrow, ascending with the promise of recovery, a bullish rejoinder that whispers of resilience and potential.
In this oscillation, encapsulated by the serene waves of the indicator below, we find the true test of our mettle. It is a siren call to the savvy, to those who can read between the peaks and troughs and discern the opportune moment to act.
This prediction, cast upon the waters of future markets, is a vessel laden with our collective wisdom. It charts a course that acknowledges the inevitable storms and celebrates the prevailing winds that propel us forward.
Let us then approach this forecast with the gravity it deserves, yet also with the optimism that has long been the hallmark of our shared ventures. For it is not just a potential decline that we prepare for, but also the ascent, the rally, the triumphant climb from the valley to the mountaintop.
In closing, may this chart serve as a beacon, guiding our investments with the twin lights of caution and opportunity. May our decisions be crafted with the precision of the master artist, turning the canvas of unpredictability into a masterpiece of profit and progress.
Thank you.
Hope the house prices go down like this :)Powered by IA :)
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Today, we stand at the precipice of potential and possibility. The image before us, a chart that speaks in the language of peaks and valleys, offers us a glimpse into the future, a prediction not taken lightly.
What we see is a story of growth, a narrative of ambition traced along the upward trend of this price channel. The slopes of this graph are not just lines but the embodiment of human endeavor and market forces, intertwined in a dance of numbers and dreams.
As the blue line ascends within the bounds of the channel, we're reminded of the resilience and adaptability that are hallmarks of our financial markets. The channel's support and resistance lines serve as a testament to the natural ebb and flow of prices, reflecting both exuberance and caution.
Yet, here we are, at the zenith of the channel, where the price hovers with anticipation. The arrow, pointing downwards, may signify an impending change, a shift that whispers of cycles and seasons in the economic sphere. It suggests a time to pause and reflect, to consider the gravity of decisions and the weight of consequences.
This prediction, while rooted in analysis and expertise, also holds within it the unknown. It is a reminder that while we can chart a course through the seas of market speculation, the waters are ever-changing.
As we embark on the journey ahead, let us do so with vigilance and wisdom, drawing upon the rich tapestry of data that guides us. May our strategies be sound, our risks calculated, and our spirits undeterred by the tides of uncertainty.
In closing, let this price prediction serve not as a crystal ball, but as a compass — guiding us through the markets with informed perspectives and a steady hand.
Thank you.
Exploit the inflation response?In the United State's history of inflation, we can observe a specific pattern anytime the inflation rate spikes.
First in 1935, and again in 1969. Each time this happened we saw two additional spikes each about 4.5-5 years apart.
Given the recent spike in inflation in 2022, we may again see another two additional spikes in inflation. One around 2027, and another around 2032.
Thanks to the recent spike, we were able to observe first hand how the market reacts to the policy response on inflation which is to increase rates.
Further - it is likely that when the market reacts unfavorably to the increase in rates, it will bottom out in approximately 10 months like it did in October of 2022 meaning we will be able to have an idea of when to go stop shorting and enter long positions.
TLDR: market should pump til' like 2027 all things held constant xD.
next weak is very stong for natural gas good opportunity to buy.
natural gas is support level that wait for one weak .that is New long-term trend lows were reached today in the price of natural gas as it dropped below the prior trend low of 1.95, but support .
Always seek financial advice or consultation before making any investments."
Wilshire 5000 - approaching a decision point.The Wilshire 5000 is basically the broad market
literally every publicly company in the America and also some foreign corporations are incorporated in this index
We are coming to a decision area, not right now. But over the course of the next few months and years.
We could see a breakout up and a continuation of the ever uptrend
or a breakdown,
and change in longterm trend
Since these numbers are denominated in ever worthless dollars
betting up
with periods of panic has forever been the right call.
Place your bets accordingly.
Assessing The Inflation Outlook: Not Yet Out Of The WoodsInflation, naturally, remains the topic at the forefront of the minds of both market participants and policymakers alike. As price pressures continue to fade, and the majority of developed economies enter the ‘last mile’ of prices returning to target, whether the immaculate disinflation seen to date can continue, or whether the inflationary beast may yet still have a sting in its tail.
First things first, it’s important to recognise the progress that has been made across DM in restoring a level of price stability. Having peaked around, or north of, 10% in the second half of 2022, the most rapid policy tightening cycle in four decades, coupled with the fading of supply-driven price pressures due to pandemic-related distortions, has seen headline price measures more than half in the subsequent 18 months.
However, as is clear in the above chart, progress has somewhat stalled over the last quarter or so – longer Stateside – with headline inflation having begun to stabilise at still-elevated levels. While a substantial chunk of this is due to a recent resurgence in energy prices, allowing core (ex-food and energy) price measures to continue to decline, this lack of further disinflationary progress at the headline level is likely to be of increasing concern as time goes on.
Before examining where risks to the inflation outlook lie, it’s key to acknowledge that the progress made thus far in restoring price stability has been ‘immaculate’, i.e. not coming – as many, including I, had expected – at the cost of a sharp deterioration in economic growth, or a significant loosening in global labour markets.
In fact, it was notable how, at the January FOMC press conference, Chair Powell noted that stronger growth is no longer seen as a problem, and that the Fed are ‘not looking for a weaker labour market’. These comments were both in rather sharp contrast to Powell, and the FOMC’s, previous stance that a period of ‘below-trend growth’ would be needed in order to bring inflation towards target. As with the prior, pre-covid cycle, evidence would suggest that the Phillips curve remains essentially flat.
Despite all that, DM economies remain far from ‘out of the woods’ on the inflation front. While, as discussed, headline price gauges have made substantial progress towards target, it is important to recognise that much of this progress has come as a result of goods disinflation, as services prices have remained relatively ‘sticky’ at elevated levels.
This is true of the US.
While also being true of inflation here in the UK.
This points to an interesting dynamic over coming months. With economic momentum showing little sign of waning, particularly in the US, and labour markets set to remain tight, all signs point towards consumer spending remaining resilient. Such resilience should maintain upward pressure on services prices, particularly when considering that the lagged impacts of prior tightening appear less detrimental than had been feared, with effective mortgage rates in the US remaining below 4%, having risen just 50bp during the hiking cycle.
At the same time, the risks of a resurgence in goods inflation remain elevated, most notably as a result of continued, and escalating, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, causing numerous shipping firms to avoid the Red Sea, resulting in a substantially longer – and more expensive – journey around the Cape of Good Hope. Benchmark container rates from China to Europe have already quadrupled since the turn of the year, a price rise that is likely to feed along the value chain, with question marks persisting over the ability of firms to absorb these costs.
January’s ISM PMI surveys provided an important reminder that price pressures remain within the economy. For the manufacturing sector, the prices paid gauge printed north of the 50 mark – implying an MoM increase – for the first time in nine months, while the comparable services gauge rose to 64.0, its highest in almost a year.
The potential dynamic here is such that services inflation remains sticky, at the same time as goods inflation makes a resurgence due to a rise in shipping costs, thus exerting significant upward pressure on overall headline inflation. Of course, such a dynamic is unlikely to impact all DM economies equally, with the eurozone substantially more exposed than others; incidentally, posing a conundrum for the ECB, who are also grappling with an increasingly sick German economy, and anaemic economic growth.
More broadly, for policymakers, these upside inflation risks point to the easing cycle beginning later than markets currently foresee, even after the hawkish repricing that has been seen since the start of the year.
This is due to a likely desire to err on the side of caution, and maintaining restrictive policy for too long, as opposed to easing prematurely. Such a mentality seemingly stems from two sources. Firstly, continued scarring from the experience of dismissing price pressures as ‘transitory’ during 2021, and the subsequent erosion of credibility caused once forced into a rapid tightening cycle. And, secondly, a desire to avoid a ‘stop-start’ easing cycle, whereby it becomes necessary to hit pause on rate cuts for a period or, worse, re-tighten policy due to a resurgence in inflation.
For markets, this all points to the hawkish repricing of rate expectations continuing, posing a downside risk to fixed income in the process, particularly in locales – such as the US – where growth is also holding up substantially better than consensus expected. That dynamic should also see upside USD risks persist, particularly against G10s where earlier cuts are likely, namely the EUR, the CHF, and the NZD.
The Business Cycle is turning up ISM Services PMI
Rep: 53.4% ✅ HIGHER THAN EXPECTED ✅
Exp: 51.7%
Prev: 50.5% (revised down marginally from 50.6%)
The reading for ISM Services PMI came in much higher than expected with services remaining in expansionary territory for Jan 2024 (>50 Level)
Whilst ISM Manufacturing PMI came in at 49.1 on the 1st Feb (<50 level) and in contractionary territory, it has made a higher low much like Services PMI. Manufacturing has increased from 46 in July 2023 to 49.1 currently.
Services continues to outperform Manufacturing. Both Services and manufacturing appear to be making a series of high lows on the chart which may suggest that this business cycle is starting to turn and curl to the upside.
PUKA
Quantitative Support in the US1. Liquidity and Investments:
An increase in M2 typically means there is more liquidity in the economy, as consumers and businesses have more cash or cash-equivalents at their disposal. This excess liquidity can lead to increased investment in stocks, including those in the S&P 500, driving up stock prices.
2. Economic Expectations:
A growing money supply can signal that central banks (like the Federal Reserve in the United States) are implementing looser monetary policies, often in response to concerns about economic growth. Lower interest rates and other forms of monetary stimulus can encourage borrowing and investing, leading investors to buy stocks in anticipation of economic recovery or growth, which can push up stock market indices like the SPX.
3. Inflation Expectations:
Over the long term, increases in the money supply can lead to inflationary expectations. If investors believe that inflation will rise, they might choose to invest in assets like stocks, which are seen as a hedge against inflation, because companies can raise prices to maintain their revenues and profits in nominal terms. This shift can drive up stock prices, including those in the S&P 500.
4. Risk Appetite:
An expanding money supply can also affect investor sentiment and risk appetite. With more money available and potentially lower returns from traditional safe investments (like savings accounts or bonds, which might offer lower interest rates when the money supply is growing), investors may turn to the stock market in search of higher returns, driving up equity prices.
S&P can go higher, this depends on the FED
Golilocks continues.
The economy is not going to crash, why?
It's already happened. We had a GFC.
Go to university and do any relevant classes to macroeconomics. You will at some point discuss, or study the GFC. This is so we does not happen again.
Of-course nothing is going to go terrible during a US election year.
Now this does not stop black swan events...
SLOOS Banking Lending Conditions- Released Monday 5th Feb 2024 Please review my prior post for a more detailed breakdown
Released quarterly, the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices (SLOOS) is a survey of up to 80 large domestic banks and 24 branches of international banks to gain insight into credit, lending and bank practices. The Federal Reserve issues and collates the voluntary surveys.
The surveys generally include 25 questions and a number of special questions about development in banking practices. They cover practices for the previous three months, but also deal with expectations for the coming quarter and year. While some queries are quantitative, most are qualitative.
The surveys have come to cover increasingly timely topics, for example, providing the Fed with insight into bank forbearance policies and trends in response to the 2020 economic crisis.
Let’s have a look at the culmination of the some of the more important data in chart form
The Chart
The blue line on the chart plots the results of the SLOOS survey – specifically, the net percentage of polled banks reporting that they’ve tightened their lending standards to commercial and industrial customers.
The other lines are specified on the chart and are self explanatory .
PUKA
MACRO MONDAY 32~The SLOOS~ Is Lending Increasing or decreasing?MACRO MONDAY 32 – The SLOOS
Released Monday 5th Feb 2024 (for Q4 2023)
Released quarterly, the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices (SLOOS) is a survey of up to 80 large domestic banks and 24 branches of international banks to gain insight into credit, lending standards and bank practices. The Federal Reserve issues and collates these voluntary surveys.
The surveys generally include 25 questions and a number of special questions about development in banking practices. They cover practices for the previous three months, but also deal with expectations for the coming quarter and year. While some queries are quantitative, most are qualitative.
The surveys have come to cover increasingly timely topics, for example, providing the Fed with insight into bank forbearance policies and trends in response to the 2020 economic crisis.
Let’s have a look at the culmination of the some of the more important data from the SLOOS in chart form
The Chart
The blue line on the chart plots the results of the SLOOS survey – specifically, the net percentage of polled banks reporting that they’ve tightened their lending standards to commercial and industrial customers.
I have combined the SLOOS Tightening Lending Standards on the chart with the Unemployment Rate. You can clearly see a pattern of the SLOOS leading the Unemployment Rate and also the broad correlation of their trends. Recessions are in grey.
The SLOOS Tightening Lending Standards
(blue line)
▫️ Lending standards tightened significantly prior to the onset of each of the last three recessions (See green lines and text on chart).
▫️ When lending conditions tightened by 54% or greater it coincided with the last four recessions. (Represented by the horizontal red dashed line on the chart and the red area at the top)
▫️ On two occasions the 54% level being breached would have been a pre-recession warning; prior to the 1990 recession and 2000 recession providing approx. 3 months advance warning.
▫️ When we breached the c.34% level in Jan 2008 it marked the beginning of that recession. We are currently at 33.9% (for Q3 2023) and were as high as 50% in the reading released in July (for Q2 2023). Above the 34% on the chart is the orange area, an area of increased recession risk but not guaranteed recession.
▫️ Interestingly, every recession ended close to when we exited back out below the 34% level. This makes the 34% level an incredibly useful level to watch for tomorrows release. If we break below the 34% level it would be a very good sign. We could speculate that it could be a sign of a soft landing being more probable and could suggest a soft recessionary period has already come and gone (based solely on this chart continuing on a downward trajectory under 34%). I emphasize “speculate”.
U.S. Unemployment Rate (Red Line)
▫️ I have included the U.S. Unemployment Rate in red as in the last three recessions you can see that the unemployment rate took a sudden turn up, just before recession. This is a real trigger warning for recession on the chart. Whilst we have had an uptick in recent months, it has not been to the same degree as these prior warning signals. These prior stark increases were an increases of approx. 0.8% over two to three quarters. Our current increase is not even half of this (3.4% to 3.7% from Jan 2023 to present, a 0.3% increase over 1 year). If we rise up to 4.2% or higher we can start getting a little concerned.
▫️ The Unemployment Rate either based or rose above 4.3% prior to the last three recessions onset. This is another important level to watch in conjunction with the 34% and 54% levels on the SLOOS. All these levels increase or decrease the probability of recession and should infer a more or less risk reductive strategy for markets.
In the above we covered the Net percentage of Banks Tightening Standards for Commercial and Industrial Loans to Large and mid-sized firms. The SLOOS provides a similar chart dataset for Tightening Standards for Small Firms, and another similar dataset for Consumer Loans and Credit Cards. I will share a chart in the comments that illustrates all three so that tomorrow we can update you with the new data released for all of them. You are now also better equipped to make your own judgement call based on the history and levels represented in the above chart, all of which is only a guide.
Remember all these charts are available on TradingView and you can press play and update yourself as to where we are in terms of zones or levels breached on the charts.
Thanks for coming along again
PUKA