Potential Multibagger Stock, Mother Pattern Spotted This sugar stock has all the makings of a multibagger! It experienced a downtrend starting in 2006, followed by a 12-year sideways consolidation period from 2011. During this rangebound phase, a massive 12-year Head & Shoulders pattern formed. The stock broke out in 2023 and is now retesting that breakout level. Everything is lining up for potentially huge returns in the coming years. What more could you ask for?
ESCORTS NSE:ESCORTS
Parameter Value
Trend Reversing to bullish
Entry Zone ₹3,250–3,300 (or above ₹3,400)
Targets ₹3,500 → ₹3,680 → ₹3,850+
Stop-Loss ₹3,150 (strict)
ADX Signal Bullish (+DI > -DI)
Volume Confirming accumulation
Ideal Entry: Between ₹3,250–₹3,300 (on dips near support zones, preferably above 3,215 for safety).
Confirmation Buy: Breakout above ₹3,400–3,420 with strong volume (price has tested this region recently).
DEEPAKNTR NSE:DEEPAKNTR
🚨 Buy Entry Suggestion:
Wait for confirmation: A daily close above ₹2,150 (previous resistance) with continued volume and strong crossover on EMAs.
Conservative traders may wait for the price to sustain above the 31 EMA (currently ₹1,973.93).
📌 Summary:
✅ Early Buy Zone: Between ₹1,975–2,030 (if confirmed with volume and crossover).
✅ Strong Confirmation Buy Zone: Above ₹2,150.
❌ Avoid buying if price breaks below ₹1,950 again — would indicate false breakout.
CRM not looking EWVwap acted as support
good price by trend
everyone are still fearful
BECAUSE theres a hidden RSI bearish divergence i will only take this long IF it retraces to previous resistance trendline and it acts as support (market structure change and reversal)
if it sweeps 290 I will look for the retrace at a higher price.
like previous resistance.
The reason i dont want to long here specifically is because i want higher probabilities in my favor.
If BTC Crashes, MSTR Has No Bottom Although I regularly have made bear forecasts on various things, I've never made a forecast of something going to zero (or as good as) before.
It's something that's outside the scope of what my strategies are designed to do. They're based on trend development ideas and actually I generally tend to get fairy bullish in tight zones on things when they are around 75% down.
When I make bear forecasts I generally make them with no regard given to what happens after they hit or to be bullish after they hit.
MSTR finds itself in the unique position of being the only stock I've ever made this forecast on (Maybe the only one I ever will) because it is apparent to me based on reading the 8-K for MSTR that if BTC were to make a technical break and follow the downtrend cycle implied by that, the situation Saylor has created makes it almost impossible MSTR doesn't go bust.
Or, more likely, they find some way to bail themselves out at the cost of the investors - like Saylor did in 2000.
Another thing you don't see me doing often is going out my way to talk bad about people. I'm just not that into it. But Saylor ... is an exception.
Saylor is the bubble man! Now, look - if you're into BTC, forget that for a second. I'm talking about Saylor. He has a history of doing something very specific - hopping onto a hype train, leveraging up to the max, encouraging others to take all in risk and seeing massive crashes in the stock if the bet wasn't right.
On March 20, 2000, MicroStrategy's stock price plummeted by a staggering 62% in a single day, falling from $226.75 to $86.75. This was one of the most dramatic single-day collapses of the dot-com era. The stock continued to fall in the subsequent days and weeks.
Saylor is a high roll gambler playing games to get his bankroll.
And the way Saylor has structured the MSTR bet makes it very hard to see any way the company could survive (without some kinda investor slaying event) a sustained downturn in Bitcoin.
I've seen videos of Saylor saying things like "If BTC went to $1 we'd just buy all the Bitcoin".
Compared to what is in their 8-K, this is outright lies. There is almost zero chance MSTR would be able to sustain its position in Bitcoin under $15,000 if it stayed there some time.
The difference between $15,000 and $1 is a lot.
MSTR's bet does not give it an exact "Liquidation price", as such. It's not like if BTC hit $14,999 the company would fail. But this idea they'd just be "Buying all the Bitcoin" is outright lies.
Because in this situation, MSTR would have no money. The way MSTR plans to raise money is selling MSTR stock at prices higher than it is now. If Bitcoin dropped and MSTR dropped, this would be far less attractive to do. The alternative is to raise funds from somewhere else (increase leverage)- but this could be hard to source in such an environment.
When the bubble boy is out of his natural environment of dreamland markets, he's not as popular.
Not buying all the BTC won't make MSTR go bust - what the problem would be as time went on is they have repayments they have to make on the debt they've accumulated. MSTR has three options how to pay this. Sell stock (Previously discussed), borrow money (take on more debt) or sell Bitcoin (At a major loss).
That's their options. They should have another one. The other option should be "Make money with the tech company" - but if you go to the weekly chart on MSTR and zoom out, you'll see they've never done that. MSTR is one of the worst performing tech stocks of all time - and in their 8-K they say they're not making money from that business.
MSTR only went up when Saylor latched onto the hype of BTC and began to deploy a leveraged bet. That for the second time in history began a sustained MSTR rally, the last one being when he did the same thing (Plus some accounting fraud) to run up the stock in the dot com bubble which then would slam and not recover until the new hype train in 2021.
I mentioned $15,000 as a bad price for MSTR. Realistically, I found it'd be unlikely MSTR can do well with BTC under 30K for a sustained period of time. Even if it crashed and then just ranged there for a few years, this would be very troublesome for MSTR. They'd have a lot of payments to make in that time with no money.
Their avenues to make money shut down. The tech company that never made money would probably be managing to under perform its terrible track record - perhaps redundant because of AI - the stock price would be in the gutter and all the people who'd be interested in lending to a guy like Saylor to do what he did would probably be quite cash strapped. Or wary.
This isn't even an isolated risk. It's not even the case you can say "If BTC goes to $10,000 and stays there for 3 years before it goes to $150,000, MSTR will struggle".
If it goes to $150,000, MSTR will just leverage up and up the price at which they'd enter into this situation of having known payments to make and no known way to generate the money to pay them other than selling BTC. Which since they would be progressively increasing their average price on that - would also always be at a big loss if sold into a downturn.
All of this assumes that Saylor can easily sell as much BTC when he wants to and that not causing an issue.
In the example of BTC trading in a range under30K for a while, our example assumes Saylor can sell BTC to cover costs and BTC remains in the range. Which might not be what happens. Given it's public knowledge when Saylor needs to make these repayments, and given it's public knowledge they have no means of making money - might not this lead to speculation?
If the market knows Saylor is going to sell, might it not front run it? Might investors and speculators not panic?
The idea of "Reflexivity" basically says that once things are in motion they will tend to feed upon themselves. Creating positive feedback loops. Good things breed good things. An example of this would be a stock rising makes it easier for the company to raise money and with more money they can make more money. Positive feedback loop.
But this same idea works the same in reverse, and the negative feedback loop for MSTR is blatantly obviously to see - so much so that I think it's inevitable if the "Risk move" in BTC EVER happens - MSTR will likely go bust. But as I keep saying, there are ways MSTR can survive - it just means the investors are screwed.
They can convert debt into stock. Maybe they'll find buyers for stock. Perhaps selling their Bitcoin can save the company at the cost of the share price.
None of them would be good for investors. And these are the only things they could do.
MSTR have taken a super aggressive bet. They've done it in a fancy way but they've basically used starting leverage and then the leverage of running profits to increasingly build a position into an uptrend. When you take the ideology out of this, all this is doing is super aggressively pyramiding into a trend with no trailing stops.
I can tell you what has to happen to your position when there's a bigger than expected pullback when that happens!
And, in this one rare case, I can tell you if that happened in BTC I see no logical way to believe MSTR does not go to zero, or as good as.
Saylor is an incredibly irresponsible man.
He has set up a situation where anything outside of the flawless bull trend over time he expects happens his company is almost certain to go bust.
And then he presents himself as the modern day investing Jesus to young and naive people with no market experience - telling them to take as much risk as they can too.
Saylor, hopefully in jest, suggests "Sell a Kidney if you must". I'd recommend he "Rent a brain if he can".
Saylor is an all in gambler. That's the truth of the man.
Acadia Healthcare Company | ACHC | Long at $21.98Acadia Healthcare's NASDAQ:ACHC stock has fallen nearly -76% in a year, primarily due to weak 2024 results, missed revenue and EPS expectations, and a soft 2025 revenue guidance. Ongoing federal investigations into billing practices and lawsuits have further eroded investor confidence. However, it is currently trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of 7.42x and earnings are forecast to grow 7.07% per year. The profitable company is trading at a good value compared to other healthcare companies. Debt-to-equity is relatively low (0.64x), but legal risks (DOJ probe, lawsuits) strain margins.
The stock has entered my "major crash" simple moving average territory and there is a lot of downward / selling pressure. But, more often than not, this area (which... I caution... still extends down near $16) can often signal a temporary or longer-term bottom. Personally, this is a buy area ($16-$21) even if it turns into a short-term bounce in 2025. But I believe the overall market moves in the S&P 500, etc. will guide this stock more than anything at this point (unless more bad news about the company emerges).
One thing to note is that there are open price gaps on the daily chart near $17, $10, and $8. These gaps, which often (but not always) get closed in the lifetime of a stock, are a potential signal for further declines - at least at some point. There could be a drop near $16, then a $10-$20 bullish price increase after that, followed by more declines (trapping investors). Time will tell, but NASDAQ:ACHC is currently attractively valued. From a technical analysis standpoint, it is in a personal "buy zone", even if purely for a swing trade.
Targets:
$27.00
$33.00
$39.00
NBCCAn uptrend can be expected above the resistance level.
If it comes back below the resistance level the selling is expected to continue
If you find this helpful and want more FREE forecasts in TradingView, Hit the 'BOOST' button
Drop some feedback in the comments below! (e.g., What did you find most useful?
How can we improve?)
Your support is appreciated!
Now, it's your turn!
Be sure to leave a comment; let us know how you see this opportunity and forecast.
Have a successful week
DISCLAIMER: I am NOT a SEBI registered advisor or a financial adviser. All the views are for educational purpose only
GOOGL | Long | Strong Fundamentals | (April 2025)GOOGL | Long | Strong Fundamentals + Technical Support | (April 2025)
1️⃣ Insight Summary:
Google (GOOGL) is showing strong fundamental performance with healthy earnings, a growing outlook, and a technically supportive zone. It’s currently sitting at $159, and based on both macro trends and chart structure, there’s potential for a move higher.
2️⃣ Trade Parameters:
Bias: Long
Entry: Around $159
Stop Loss: $140
TP1: $160 ✅ (light partial)
TP2: $200 ✅ (major target)
Ultimate Target: $250 🏁
Partial Exits: 25% at each target level to manage risk and lock in gains.
3️⃣ Key Notes:
🔹 Fundamentals are solid: Google has a net income of $100B and EPS around $8, with a growing outlook.
🔹 Dividend yield is modest at 0.51%, but it's backed by $28B in debt and strong cash flow.
🔹 Technically, GOOGL is trading in a supportive zone and could revisit previous highs around $200+.
🔹 Market cap sits at $2T, showing investor confidence.
🔹 Watch the broader market (e.g., SPX, NQ) for sentiment shifts that could impact tech stocks.
4️⃣ Follow-up:
Will review this trade setup and update if price approaches $200 or reacts at key levels.
Please LIKE 👍, FOLLOW ✅, SHARE 🙌 and COMMENT ✍ if you enjoy this idea! Also share your ideas and charts in the comments section below! This is best way to keep it relevant, support us, keep the content here free and allow the idea to reach as many people as possible.
Disclaimer: This is not a financial advise. Always conduct your own research. This content may include enhancements made using AI.
NVDIA Short to T1 2 Setups here.
- Both T1 and T2 will be hit as part of my price return to zero system (inflexion points).
- I'm shorting to T1 first and then reverse into long for T2. If it heads to T2 first I'll simply stay in my original T1 short for the duration.
It is of course easy to say that this will either go up or down :-). My system defines targets and there is no rules to say that can only produce a target in one direction. Based on what I see I know with around 95% accuracy that it will hit both with a reasonable timescale. I just don't know which one comes first :).
Either way I'm shorting to T1 in the first instance. It may hit T2 first but that doesn't bother my trading as I still expect T1. I won't go down the route of a martingale to T! if it goes to T2 first!! that's just asking for trouble regardless of confidence levels!
MSFT is losing key levelsMicrosoft has lost some very important support levels. After falling by 10%, it rebounded to the former support area, which is now acting as resistance. Many investors took advantage of this move to exit at a better price than we saw recently. Unless the stock moves back above this level, the outlook for MSFT remains bearish, and we may soon see further surprises in the US tech sector.
LanzaTech (LNZA). Extremely oversold! Rally incoming?NASDAQ: LanzaTech (LNZA) , based in Illinois, USA, has recently has seen a price low of $0.1401 . This waste management company in recent times, has been featured as a top pick for buys by various news outlets. Although in an extremely bearish slump, I have a bullish prediction.
In the technicals on the 1 Day Chart , the RSI appears to be indicating oversold , with a slight potential of more of a dip to come. The Stochastic seems to also be indicating oversold market conditions. A long time frame bullish RSI divergence also appears to be forming starting at the middle of Feb 2023.
LanzaTech recently declined a "lowball" offer for $0.02 a share, which could signal insider bullish sentiment. LanzaTech FY25 Q1 earnings are forecasted to be significantly higher than FY24 Q4 at this time (RH). Their website, marketing and twitter appear to show no real signs of slowing business operations in my opinion.
Analysis also appears shows that there is very little open interest on put options at this time. Conversely there seems to be a large number of call options from $1-$7 expiring in the near future signaling institutions and high profile traders may be entering the market quietly.
Given the above signals and analysis I personally am setting a speculative stretch price target of $7 with various other orders taking profit along the way at key strike price cluster levels. With LanzaTech at a discounted price, a buy now could yield significant results.
Anything can happen in the markets. What do you think? Will LanzaTech recover? Or will value become completely wiped out?
Disclaimer: Not Financial Advice