NVDA wow 105 PM AND will be under 100 by eod. I've been adding puts since 118 lol. Can't believe people have been "buying the dip" on this pump stock. It's in the center of a wild worldwide tarrif game and people think they are buying the dip. lmao. Unless you have deep pockets, this ain't a dip, it's a sell off. Your average will be trash. R I.P 🐂🪤🪦🤳🏽🌄☕NVIDIA CORP DRN forum
NVDA wow 105 PM AND will be under 100 by eod. I've been adding puts since 118 lol. Can't believe people have been "buying the dip" on this pump stock. It's in the center of a wild worldwide tarrif game and people think they are buying the dip. lmao. Unless you have deep pockets, this ain't a dip, it's a sell off. Your average will be trash. R I.P 🐂🪤🪦🤳🏽🌄☕
NVDA 115 and up today
NVDA Further foreign boycotts on US products will quickly kill US market. Trump has just opened the gate of hell yesterday. He gambled big.
NVDA ustr.gov/issue-areas/reciprocal-tariff-calculationsWhile the “Reciprocal Tariff Calculations” offer an interesting framework to quantify the tariff rate required to balance bilateral trade, modern economic principles suggest that:
Trade imbalances are primarily driven by deep-seated macroeconomic factors, not merely by tariffs or regulatory hurdles.
The effectiveness of tariffs in achieving trade balance is limited by factors such as import demand elasticity, tariff passthrough, and general equilibrium adjustments.
Policy measures to address trade imbalances must consider broader economic welfare rather than solely focusing on the trade balance number.
In summary, while the methodology presented provides a numerical exercise, its underlying assumptions do not fully capture the complex, interrelated factors that modern economists consider crucial in understanding trade deficits and formulating effective trade policy.
NVDA not an economist but this sounds extremely stupid: This calculation assumes that persistent trade deficits are due to a combination of tariff and non-tariff factors that prevent trade from balancing. This is incorrect because:
Trade Imbalances Are Largely Driven by Macroeconomic Factors
Trade deficits are often a result of monetary policy, savings rates, investment flows, and currency values, rather than trade barriers.
The U.S., for example, has run trade deficits for decades despite having relatively low trade barriers.
Countries With Few Trade Barriers Still Run Deficits
If tariffs and non-tariff barriers were the main causes, then countries with free trade policies should not experience persistent trade deficits. Yet, nations like the U.S. and the U.K. continue to run deficits despite having open markets.
Trade Naturally Doesn't "Balance"
Trade isn’t always expected to balance in a strict exports = imports sense.
Some countries (like China and Germany) run consistent trade surpluses, while others (like the U.S.) run persistent deficits due to differences in savings rates and capital flows.
Foreign Capital Inflows Sustain Deficits
When a country attracts foreign investment, it can afford to import more than it exports without tariffs playing a role.
The U.S. trade deficit is partly sustained by demand for U.S. assets (stocks, bonds, real estate), which leads to higher imports.
Conclusion
Trade deficits are complex and primarily driven by macroeconomic conditions rather than just tariffs or trade restrictions. The idea that deficits persist solely due to trade barriers overlooks fundamental economic factors like capital flows, consumption patterns, and global trade specialization.
ustr.gov/issue-areas/reciprocal-tariff-calculations
NVDA 
INTCTrump has apparently exempted Semiconductors from his 'Liberation Day' round of tariffs due to their critical function in the AI & Tech supply chains.
Forerunning in AI & Tech is a major component in the economic success of USA (and also in the retaliatory countries), ensuring that Semiconductors will be left alone in the of Tariff Wars.
NVDA $80 is coming. when stocks are crashing hard like this it is an opportunity for us average people to get rich
NVDA in one month NVDA will hit 100 and may go as low as 80 in two months.(This is not a trading advice)