MicroStrategyMicroStrategyMicroStrategy

MicroStrategy

No trades
See on Supercharts

MicroStrategy stock forum


MSTR Holding onto a losing stock doesn’t make sense — it reminds me of that behavioral finance lecture on investors tend to have loss aversion




MSTR These tariffs will only be in place for a few months. Countries will negotiate better trade terms to lower tariffs on US products, having more opportunity for US products in the country.

MSTR
Is not nobody sell
Nobody buying
No volume

MSTR 300 by the close is in the cards. this is temporarily indestructible for some reason the premium and BTC are iron clad strong


MSTR 1. “Trade protectionism” is not a step backward — it’s long-overdue self-defense.
For decades, the U.S. has been the sacrificial lamb of global trade — opening our markets wide while our “allies” slam tariffs, manipulate currency, subsidize industries, and siphon wealth from our middle class. Trump’s move is not reckless — it’s rectifying a grotesque imbalance where America plays by imaginary “free trade” rules no one else honors.

2. Yes, tariffs are taxes. But so is surrendering your economy.
The article moans that tariffs are “taxes on consumers.” True — but what about the unseen tax of offshoring jobs, hollowing out manufacturing, and creating entire ghost towns across the Rust Belt? The real price is paid in lost sovereignty, weakened labor markets, and national dependence on foreign supply chains that collapse under pressure (see: COVID, semiconductors, antibiotics).

Trump’s tariffs are a strategic tax — a small price to pay to rebuild domestic industry, leverage better trade terms, and stop being the world’s punching bag.

3. “Tariffs harm exports”? Only if we let other countries dictate the game.
Retaliation? Please. The U.S. has the largest, most desirable consumer market in the world. Our leverage is unmatched. Countries don’t retaliate because they can’t afford to be locked out of the U.S. market for long — and when they do retaliate, it’s often bluff and bark. When Trump hit China with tariffs in his first term, U.S. exports adjusted, and China ultimately folded into partial deals.

And no, this isn’t “inviting China in.” Trump doesn’t appease China — he isolates it. The real appeasers are those who want to keep playing by globalist rules while China rewrites the script behind closed doors.

4. U.S. “economic leadership” didn’t come from free trade — it came from strength.
The article waxes nostalgic about “seven decades of prosperity under free trade.” What a joke. That era was built on American dominance, not fair deals. The Marshall Plan, Bretton Woods, and dollar hegemony were products of military victory and economic supremacy, not naïve liberalism. And even in those golden years, America controlled the game.

Today’s globalism is not the same. It’s weaponized trade — a race to the bottom. Trump’s approach isn’t anti-leadership — it’s taking the reins back from Davos bureaucrats and Wall Street financiers who sold out our future for short-term arbitrage.

5. “Lobbyist swamp”? That’s already the status quo.
The idea that tariffs will worsen lobbying is laughable. Have the authors been asleep for the last 30 years? Corporate America already spends billions lobbying for outsourcing, deregulation, and loopholes. If anything, strategic tariffs disrupt that cycle and force companies to compete by building here, hiring here, and paying American wages.

6. This isn’t isolationism — it’s economic rearmament.
The future is multipolar. BRICS, China, and others are actively weaponizing trade, finance, and supply chains. Trump’s tariffs aren’t “protectionist panic” — they’re the opening move in an economic realignment where America plays offense again.

We’re not ending free trade. We’re ending fake trade — where America opens its borders, loses its factories, and gets lectured on “rules-based order” by countries running 30% tariffs on our goods.

MSTR reply to this message for buttermilk pancakes