TESLA: Fractal Metrics
Fractal Cyclicality
Cycle I
The chart displays fractal cyclicality leading up to a major breakout. It emphasizes the progression of swing percentages and cyclic patterns, potentially identifying the foundational structure for a larger trend. The use of layered channels adds depth to the analysis, showing both minor and major fractal levels.
Cycle II
The upward and downward swings in this cycle demonstrate increased volatility and amplitude compared to the initial cycle. This suggests a stronger market reaction and more pronounced trends within the fractal structure.
The price action aligns closely with the channel boundaries, indicating the preservation of the fractal framework while showcasing expansion within the structure.
The swings are visually more aggressive, with higher peaks and deeper corrections, highlighting the market's larger movements leading up to the breakout.
The cyclical patterns and overlapping fractal waves are more intricate, suggesting a maturing market phase with more participants and liquidity.
Cycle III
All three cycles exhibit a fractal nature with nested waves, maintaining consistency in cyclic progression through identifiable peaks and troughs.
The price movement continues to respect the broader channel boundaries, reinforcing the fractal geometry's framework.
Similar to the first two cycles, the third cycle shows distinct swings with well-defined percentage movements, suggesting a rhythmic market behavior.
Like the earlier cycles, the third cycle builds on the previous fractal structure, with larger amplitudes and deeper corrections, indicating scaling behavior.
Phi remain prominent and rooted across all cycles, suggesting persistent harmonic proportions.
Evolutionary Growth in the Third Cycle
The swings in the third cycle appear to be significantly larger than those in the first two, reflecting an increase in market volatility and participation.
The third cycle seems to be emerging over a more extended period, indicating maturation in the fractal evolution.
The deeper corrections, such as the -75.44% retracement, highlight stronger mean reversion tendencies before significant expansions.
