GOLD recovers, capped by $3,350, trend viewOANDA:XAUUSD recovered then weakened as it failed to break above $3,350, supported by a weaker dollar and market uncertainty sparked by reports that U.S. President Donald Trump could replace Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell in September or October. The reports raised concerns about the future independence of the Federal Reserve, boosting demand for safe-haven gold.
On Wednesday, Trump called Powell “terrible” and said he was considering three or four candidates to replace him. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump was even considering announcing a potential successor as early as September or October.
The current market narrative is that once Trump nominates a new Fed chair, market expectations will tend to favor a more “dovish” Fed. This could lead to a weaker US dollar, higher long-term US Treasury yields and higher stock prices.
Forexlive points out that this story may be more an emotional reaction than a result of objective and rational thinking. The policy of the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) is decided not only by the Fed Chairman but also by a majority vote of the 12 voting members (including 7 directors and 5 regional Fed presidents). The Fed Chairman does have a lot of influence, but he does not have absolute control over monetary policy. The Fed was originally designed to be independent of political pressure.
Moreover, even if Trump nominates the next chairman, there is no guarantee that this will automatically lead to a rate cut. In fact, Powell was also nominated by Trump, but his monetary policy decisions are still based on professional judgment rather than serving Trump's wishes.
So, in the worst case, the market could face policy uncertainty as differences between FOMC members increase and more disagreements emerge. Currently, there are fewer moderate members on the committee, while neutral or hawkish members dominate.
Markets are now focused on personal consumption expenditure (PCE) data due later today (Friday) for further clues on whether the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates.
On the geopolitical front, a ceasefire between Israel and Iran appeared to be in place on Wednesday after Trump hailed a swift end to the 12-day conflict at the NATO summit and said he would seek a commitment from Iran to abandon its nuclear ambitions in talks next week.
Technical Outlook Analysis OANDA:XAUUSD
On the daily chart, after gold recovered and reached the initial target at 3,350 USD, the nearest resistance is also the price point of the EMA21 noted for readers in the previous publication.
However, the recovery momentum is currently weakening, specifically at the time of writing, the gold price is falling below 3,320 USD. Gold falling below 3,320 USD provides conditions for a possible decline with the next target around 3,302 - 3,300 USD, which is the area of the 0.382% Fibonacci retracement confluence with the lower edge of the price channel.
In terms of momentum, the RSI is heading down and breaking below 50, which should be considered an initial bearish signal.
Overall, gold does not have a clear long-term trend as the uptrend is still the main trend, while the momentum is showing signs of decline.
But personally, I am still leaning towards the uptrend, and continue to look for positions to buy.
Finally, the notable positions will be listed as follows.
Support: 3,302 – 3,300 USD
Resistance: 3,320 – 3,350 – 3,371 USD
SELL XAUUSD PRICE 3367 - 3365⚡️
↠↠ Stop Loss 3371
→Take Profit 1 3359
↨
→Take Profit 2 3353
BUY XAUUSD PRICE 3272 - 3274⚡️
↠↠ Stop Loss 3268
→Take Profit 1 3280
↨
→Take Profit 2 3286
XAUUSDK trade ideas
Report - 27 june1.
Bond Market Exodus: Why Investors Are Ditching US Long-Term Debt
In Q2 2025, net outflows from US long-dated bond funds hit $11 billion, marking the fastest pace since early 2020. This comes despite more than $39 billion pouring into short-dated funds, which are still yielding attractive real returns due to the Fed's high policy rate.
This flight from the long end is not just about yield differentials — it’s a clear repricing of sovereign risk and fiscal sustainability. The market is beginning to fear that the US is no longer a guaranteed safe haven at the long-duration end of the curve. President Trump’s renewed tax policies — projected to add trillions to the national debt — are weighing on confidence, while incoming tariffs and the risk of structurally higher inflation amplify concerns.
“There is a lot of concern domestically and from the foreign investor community about owning the long end of the Treasury curve.” – Bill Campbell, DoubleLine
Market Implication: The term premium is re-emerging — longer bonds must offer significantly higher yields to attract buyers. In real terms, longer-dated Treasuries are down ~1% this quarter, clawing back losses after tariff-induced volatility in April.
Strategic Allocation:
Stay overweight short-duration debt (SHY, BIL, floating-rate notes) for yield preservation and minimal duration risk.
Avoid duration extension. TLT, ZROZ, and long-dated corporates may face additional downside as issuance ramps and demand fades.
Consider non-dollar fixed income exposure (e.g., EU sovereigns, South Africa, Brazil), particularly where inflation targeting credibility is rising.
Macro Impact:
This shift jeopardizes debt affordability. With $33 trillion in debt and rising interest expense, the US could face debt spiral risks unless inflation softens or fiscal discipline returns. An elevated term premium can ripple into mortgages, corporate borrowing, and municipal finance, potentially crowding out private investment.
2.
Geopolitical Tensions: Iran's Nuclear Program and the Market's Response
Despite US claims of obliterating Iran’s nuclear capabilities in recent strikes, preliminary European intelligence indicates Iran’s 408kg stockpile of highly enriched uranium remains largely intact. It was reportedly dispersed before the attacks — undercutting the narrative of complete neutralization.
President Trump’s remarks, suggesting “nothing was taken out” of the main Fordow facility due to logistical constraints, reflect a public relations overstatement rather than a decisive strategic victory. While US defense officials stand by the attack’s symbolic impact, reports suggest the nuclear program was set back by months, not years.
“Trump exaggerated because he needed to... Anyone who heard his remarks could tell there was a different reality.” — Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
Market Implication:
The gold price remains elevated, closing at $3,328.22, up 0.15% on the day, and +26.81% YTD — a clear hedge against geopolitical instability.
Oil markets initially spiked but reversed as the Israel-Iran ceasefire held. Brent Crude ended at $67.14, down -6.1% over the week.
Defense stocks, particularly in US and Israeli names, are seeing flows as investors anticipate further defense budget expansions.
Strategic Allocation:
Hold or overweight gold (GLD, XAUUSD) in strategic portfolios as a volatility hedge.
Avoid chasing oil at interim highs unless further strikes materialize — use energy exposure as a short-term trade, not a structural bet.
Monitor Iranian retaliation risk and its effect on shipping lanes, which would impact insurance costs and transport-linked equities.
Macro Impact:
With Iran's capacity largely intact, nuclear diplomacy is effectively frozen. The uncertainty adds to regional instability, and markets may underprice the risk of a re-escalation. Meanwhile, continued weapons development forces global powers to shift attention (and potentially resources) away from economic diplomacy.
3.
US Export Collapse: Trade Policy Bites the Domestic Economy
In May, US goods exports fell by $9.7 billion (–5.2%), marking the largest monthly decline since the pandemic crash in 2020, according to the Census Bureau. Exports totaled $179.2 billion, sharply down from April’s figures.
This contraction followed President Trump’s "Liberation Day" tariff blitz, which spooked global trading partners. Despite some tariff suspensions, others — such as a blanket 10% duty and sector-specific metals tariffs — remain active.
“Amid the de-escalation phase of the tariff story, we are now seeing an unwind in both imports and exports.” — James Knightley, ING
Key Export Drivers:
Industrial supplies (crude oil, metals): Down 13.6% in May after a 16% surge in April.
Vehicle exports: Rebounded +3.5% after a 20% drop in April.
Trade deficit: Widened to $96.6 billion, above expectations.
Practical Market Implications:
Logistics & industrial names (FedEx, Caterpillar) face short-term margin pressure.
Commodities sensitive to trade flows — particularly metals — could see softening demand (watch steel and copper ETFs like SLX and COPX).
Dollar exposure may become more volatile as lower exports pressure the current account, contributing to a weaker dollar narrative.
Broader Economic Impact:
With inventories full and international demand softening, US manufacturing will decelerate.
Capex and employment in export-sensitive sectors are at risk if the trade environment doesn’t stabilize.
Investor Strategy:
Short-term caution on transportation (e.g., FedEx reported a sharp drop in China-US freight).
Reallocate toward domestic-facing sectors (utilities, consumer staples) that are more insulated from trade.
Currency traders may view this as a signal to fade the USD if combined with Fed dovishness.
4.
US Debt Avalanche: The Bond Exodus and What It Means for Markets
Investors are rapidly fleeing long-term US bonds, with net outflows reaching $11 billion in Q2, the sharpest retreat since early 2020, according to EPFR data. This comes amid growing concern over the US’s ballooning debt load, worsened by Trump’s proposed tax cuts and trade tariffs.
“It’s a symptom of a much bigger problem... concern about owning the long end of the Treasury curve.” — Bill Campbell, DoubleLine
Why It Matters:
Trump's tax plan is forecast to add trillions to federal debt, compelling the Treasury to issue a flood of bonds.
Simultaneously, tariffs are feared to fuel inflation, which erodes bond values — especially those with long durations.
Market Movement:
Long-term US debt fell ~1% in Q2 (Bloomberg index).
In contrast, short-term US bond funds gained $39 billion in inflows, driven by high yields at the front end of the curve.
“With inflation still above target and heavy government supply, this is driving skittishness about the long end.” — Robert Tipp, PGIM
Practical Investment Outlook:
Expect higher yields at the long end of the curve if debt issuance remains elevated and inflation expectations rise.
Flattening yield curve risk if short-end rates remain high while long-end selling continues.
Duration-sensitive portfolios (e.g. pensions) may suffer performance drag unless repositioned.
Global Spillovers:
A weaker long bond market raises benchmark rates globally, making it costlier for emerging markets to borrow.
Foreign investors (e.g., Japan and China) may diversify out of Treasuries, potentially moving capital into higher-yield EM debt or European assets.
The sell-off contributes to dollar weakness, especially when coupled with trade disruptions and Trump’s criticism of the Fed.
Investor Strategy:
Reduce duration exposure; consider floating-rate notes or shorter-dated fixed income instruments.
Explore international bonds, especially EM local currency debt, which is currently outperforming.
Use steepening yield curve trades (e.g., 2s/10s steepeners) as a way to hedge fiscal risks.
5.
Iran’s Nuclear Resilience: What Intel and Markets Tell Us
Despite claims from President Trump that Iran’s nuclear capabilities were “obliterated” in recent airstrikes, early intelligence assessments suggest otherwise. According to European and US officials, Iran’s 408kg stockpile of near-weapons-grade uranium remains largely intact, having been dispersed to other locations before the strikes.
“It did not achieve anything... Trump exaggerated.” — Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
Strategic Interpretation:
US and Israeli strikes targeted Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan — key nuclear infrastructure.
While significant damage occurred, no total structural collapse was confirmed.
This reinforces that Tehran maintains breakout capacity, and could resume enrichment rapidly if it chose to.
“The nuclear programme suffered enormous damage... but not complete destruction.” — Rafael Grossi, IAEA
Market Impact and Geopolitical Outlook:
The revelation that Iran’s uranium reserves survived the assault reduces confidence in the effectiveness of US deterrence.
Oil markets remain unfazed. Traders priced in the symbolic nature of Iran’s missile response and read the US-Israel actions as limited in strategic disruption.
Brent crude fell sharply by 6.1% to $67/bbl post-ceasefire — evidence markets anticipate no extended supply shock.
What to Expect:
Volatility premium on oil is falling. No major disruption to Strait of Hormuz = no major repricing.
Increased likelihood of backchannel diplomacy, especially as Tehran seeks to assert survival and avoid regime destabilization.
However, shadow escalation (e.g., cyber, proxy strikes) remains plausible.
Practical Asset Implications:
Oil traders are in sell-the-spike mode: Risk-on reactions are now short-lived.
Defensive commodity plays (e.g., gold) saw a pullback as perceived geopolitical risk faded.
Military-industrial equities may experience cooling momentum unless new threats emerge.
Risk of sanctions rollbacks or renegotiations could reprice energy and emerging market assets tied to Iran’s trade (e.g., India, China).
6.
Export Shock: Tariffs Bite into US Trade Performance
US goods exports plummeted by 5.2% in May, marking the sharpest drop since 2020, as President Trump’s aggressive “Liberation Day” tariff strategy triggered a major disruption in global demand for American goods. Total exports fell to $179.2bn, down $9.7bn from the prior month.
Breakdown:
Industrial supplies (including oil and metals): –13.6%
Vehicles: +3.5% (recovering from a –20% collapse in April)
Trade deficit widened to $96.6bn, beating Wall Street expectations.
“This is the tariff shock starting to filter into real data.” — ING’s James Knightley
Economic Implications:
Tariff retaliation and inventory overhang are key drivers of the export decline.
Partners reduced US imports anticipating further tariffs or supply chain reshuffles.
The loss of export revenue compounds fiscal stress, especially with simultaneous tax cuts and increased military spending.
Sectoral Risks:
Energy exporters (e.g., Texas oil firms) are hit hard — crude exports falling.
Industrial metals and machinery producers face slower foreign orders.
Shipping and logistics (e.g., FedEx) flagged the US–China lane as the weakest and most unpredictable trade route.
Market Outlook:
Dollar weakness persists, with the Dollar Index near a 3-year low, reflecting investor fear over twin deficits (fiscal + trade).
Equities may remain resilient, especially domestically focused or tariff-insulated names.
However, multinationals with global exposure could underperform due to shrinking foreign sales.
What to Expect:
Volatility in trade data until clarity returns on tariff regimes.
Renewed calls for bilateral trade talks or exemptions from key US partners (e.g., EU, Mexico).
Watch for nearshoring trends to accelerate as companies avoid tariff risk.
7.
EM Rally: Emerging Markets Outshine Developed Peers Amid US Fiscal Anxiety
In a stunning reversal of past trends, emerging market (EM) assets are rallying across asset classes in 2025 — defying both the global macro gloom and the shadow of US tariff policy.
By the Numbers:
JPMorgan EM Local Bond Index: +10% YTD
MSCI EM Equity Index: +10%
MSCI World (Developed Markets): +4.8%
EM bonds in global AUM: Rising from a low 5% share
This rotation reflects a clear diversification trend away from dollar assets, fueled by erratic US policymaking, record federal debt, and a weakening dollar. The Treasury-specific risk premium is rising — and EMs are absorbing the flow.
Drivers of the Rally:
Dollar weakness: Eases FX pressure, gives central banks room to cut.
Inflation-adjusted yields in EMs at 20-year highs, making debt highly attractive.
Declining fiscal risks in EMs contrast with ballooning G7 debt burdens.
China and South Korea lead equity optimism with innovation themes and policy clarity.
“Even small inflows are having disproportionately large effects.” — Goldman Sachs’ Kevin Daly
Risks and Rotation:
Geopolitical conflict in the Middle East did not dent EM flows — a clear sign of confidence in regional resilience.
Oil prices falling reduced tail risks for EM energy importers like India and South Korea.
Still, EM equity outflows in Q1 were sizable (–$22bn), only partially reversed in May–June (+$11bn net).
Practical Strategy for Investors:
Local currency bonds in Brazil, South Africa, Indonesia — rich yields, FX tailwinds.
Tech-heavy equity plays in China and Taiwan — exposure to global AI boom.
EM corporates still lag — cautious positioning advised due to higher default risk.
What to Watch:
Further EM policy easing, especially in Asia, will support equities.
US yield volatility may occasionally disrupt flows, but the narrative has shifted.
Multi-asset portfolios should consider overweighting EM exposure tactically in H2 2025.
8.
Shell, Sovereign Risk, and the Oil Sector Outlook: BP Takeover Denied, Sector Under Pressure
Shell’s explicit denial of takeover talks with BP, despite media speculation, offers clarity but also raises key strategic questions for the European energy sector. The sector continues to grapple with sluggish price action, mounting decarbonization pressures, and a renewed focus on capital discipline.
Key Takeaways:
Shell stated it had “no intention” of acquiring BP and had not been in talks, invoking a six-month standstill period under UK takeover law.
BP shares rose 1.3%, Shell +0.5%, largely a relief rally and not based on synergies.
This quells short-term merger speculation, but it underscores the pressure on oil majors from activist investors (e.g., Elliott’s 5% stake in BP) demanding deeper cuts, higher returns, and optionality in energy transition strategy.
“Shell has preferred buybacks to acquisitions.” — Wael Sawan, CEO
Sector-Wide Implications:
BP’s aggressive renewables push has backfired, denting valuation and making it a takeover target.
Oil majors are capital-rich but investment-conservative, amid uncertain demand outlook and energy policy volatility.
High integration costs and risk of job losses are politically toxic, limiting mega-deal feasibility.
Practical Market Interpretation:
With Brent crude hovering around $68–$70, oil equities remain valuation-sensitive and vulnerable to dividend cuts or FX shocks.
Investors should favor capital-efficient names with strong free cash flow and disciplined buyback programs.
Avoid speculative merger plays; instead, track cost reduction execution and decarbonization pace.
What to Watch:
Further activist pressure on BP and Total to streamline operations.
Potential US M&A activity in smaller shale players instead of global giants.
Any signs of OPEC+ discord or US SPR use amid volatile demand expectations.
9.
New World Development: Hong Kong’s Property Giant Faces Systemic Risk
New World Development (NWD), one of Hong Kong’s largest property conglomerates, is undergoing a delicate refinancing operation amid ballooning debt, weak property sales, and a declining tourism-reliant retail economy. The implications ripple across the Asian credit markets, Chinese property sector, and Hong Kong's financial stability.
Key Financials:
Net debt: HK$124.6bn
Refinancing talks: HK$87.5bn in bank loans
Interest costs > operating profits in 2H FY2024
Annual loss: HK$20bn, the first in two decades
Shares down 22% YTD, market cap ~HK$14bn
The developer’s leverage and stalled mainland China expansion expose it to credit market deterioration, at a time when trust in property-linked balance sheets is thin.
“It won’t be a question of how much you’re willing to pay — the cover won’t be available.” — Everest CEO Jim Williamson, referring to US casualty insurance but resonant here too.
Systemic Concerns:
Barclays estimates NWD accounts for 7% of all HK commercial property loans — nearly double Evergrande’s systemic exposure in mainland China.
Property defaults or asset fire-sales could cause bank provisioning hikes, spread to retail REITs, and exacerbate deflationary pressures.
Mitigating Actions:
NWD pledged flagship assets (e.g., Victoria Dockside) as collateral.
Actively selling projects at discounts.
Chow Tai Fook Enterprises selectively buying assets, indirectly supporting liquidity.
However, refusal to engage with bondholders, deferred perpetual interest payments, and a leadership reshuffle have eroded market confidence.
Strategic Implications for Investors:
Avoid unsecured Chinese real estate debt—bondholder transparency is poor.
Favor secured exposure or government-backed REITs tied to stable rental income.
Look for HKMA guidance: policymakers are signaling banks to avoid panic provisioning, implying the government will step in to prevent contagion.
Broader Macro Read:
Reflects fragility of China’s "recovery-lite" property model, where urban development exceeds real demand.
HK real estate’s softening is also a proxy for declining mainland tourism, rising capital costs, and shifting investor preferences.
10.
Meta’s Copyright Win: Legal Green Light for AI Model Training
Meta's recent legal victory over authors suing for unauthorized use of books in AI training marks a critical turning point in the legal framework surrounding AI development. The U.S. District Court ruled that the tech giant’s use of millions of texts to train its LLaMA models constituted “fair use”, delivering a massive tailwind to AI innovation — and to equity investors betting on the sector.
Case Summary:
Plaintiffs included notable authors like Ta-Nehisi Coates.
Meta trained its AI on LibGen-sourced books without permission.
Judge Chhabria: Ruled for Meta due to “poor argumentation” by plaintiffs — not because the court inherently favored AI use.
“This ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta’s use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful. It stands only for the proposition that these plaintiffs made the wrong arguments.” — Judge Vince Chhabria
Precedent and Practical Impact:
Reinforces the fair use doctrine for transformative technologies.
Encourages aggressive data utilization strategies by other firms.
Raises the bar for future copyright suits, requiring stronger arguments like market harm (e.g., reduced author royalties).
Implications for Tech and Equity Markets:
AI development costs may fall sharply as legal uncertainty fades.
Generative AI leaders (Meta, Anthropic, OpenAI) now face fewer near-term litigation barriers.
Paves the way for AI ETF inflows, bolsters AI-leveraged tech indices (e.g., SOXX, QQQ).
Equity long positions in semis (NVDA, AMD), cloud (MSFT, GOOGL), and enterprise AI (CRM, ORCL) become even more strategic.
Regulatory Outlook:
A longer-term battle is likely over “market dilution” claims.
Courts may soon have to decide whether AI-generated outputs undermine economic incentives for human creators.
Policy frameworks from the EU or US Congress are likely within 12–18 months.
Strategic Takeaways for Investors:
Increase exposure to AI infrastructure (e.g., Nvidia, Micron, Arista).
Maintain vigilance on evolving IP litigation trends — regulatory tone may shift depending on 2025 political outcomes.
Avoid over-concentration in companies still facing unresolved copyright or data privacy battles (e.g., Open-source LLMs with gray training data).
11.
ETF Innovation: ‘Autocallables’ Go Retail – A Structural Shift in Yield Exposure
The launch of the first US-listed ETF tracking autocallable structured products by Calamos Investments, with JPMorgan support, signals a transformative shift in how retail investors access complex income strategies. Once limited to ultra-high-net-worth clients, these derivatives — with yields near 14.7% — are now democratized through a simple ticker trade.
What Are Autocallables?
Autocallables offer periodic coupons unless a linked index (e.g., S&P 500) falls below a pre-set barrier. If the barrier is breached consistently, investors risk losing principal. They are akin to structured credit instruments but are tied to equity indices, not borrowers.
Triggered by market declines.
Maturity: typically 3 years, quarterly checks.
Final protection barrier: ~60% of starting level — breach = principal loss.
ETF will hold 52+ autocallables diversified by issuance date.
Investment Mechanics:
Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIY) charges 0.74% annual fee — above the average for US derivative-income ETFs (0.51%).
It’s part of a wider trend: structured outcome ETFs have exploded from $3.5bn in 2019 → $179bn today (Morningstar).
Mimics yield exposure of high-yield bonds, but linked to equity volatility.
Analyst Commentary:
Ben Johnson, Morningstar: “ETFs are taking share from all financial products — not just mutual funds, but also from bespoke structured notes.”
Elisabeth Kashner, FactSet: warned of misunderstanding risks: “Advisers will struggle to explain these. If markets fall, protection and yield disappear.”
Practical Implications:
Retail investors gain access to high-yielding structured credit proxies.
If adopted at scale, this could divert flows from traditional high-yield bonds and annuities.
Volatility derivatives embedded in autocallables will impact options markets and hedging strategies.
Risk Outlook:
In a sharp downturn, coupon stops and capital protection collapses — potentially leading to double-digit losses.
These ETFs may suffer sudden illiquidity if linked indices breach multiple trigger levels at once.
Systemic Considerations:
Broad adoption of these ETFs could amplify equity downside during sharp corrections — as dealers hedge risk via S&P futures.
Scenario: A systemic correction triggers autocallable barrier breaches, prompting delta-hedging cascades → market destabilization.
Investor Strategy:
Use as non-core, tactical exposure for income in low-volatility environments.
Monitor S&P drawdowns and ETF option volumes for stress signals.
Avoid relying on these instruments for downside protection in portfolios targeting retirement stability.
12.
Wall Street Outlook: Dollar Slide, Powell Speculation, and Inflation Signaling
Markets steadied this week as geopolitical tensions cooled with the Iran-Israel ceasefire, but underlying stress in key asset classes persists — particularly in foreign exchange and rate-sensitive sectors. Traders are recalibrating for what could be a pivot in US monetary policy, as political noise intensifies over Fed leadership and dollar weakness accelerates.
Dollar Pressure Deepens:
The US Dollar Index slid to a three-year low, falling 0.5% after the Wall Street Journal reported that President Trump may replace Fed Chair Jay Powell earlier than expected.
The euro surged to $1.1710, its strongest level since September 2021.
“We suspect that some of this narrative is seeping into perceptions,” said Macquarie’s Thierry Wizman, pointing to speculation over Fed independence.
This decline is especially concerning given the rebound in Treasury yields, which would traditionally support the greenback. Instead, we are witnessing a breakdown in classic correlations, as political interference becomes a dominant narrative.
Powell’s Job and Policy Path:
The idea of a “shadow chair” to pressure the Fed into rate cuts has unnerved institutional allocators. The White House denied imminent changes but confirmed the president’s “right to change his mind.”
This raises risk premiums around Fed credibility, especially with inflation still a threat and growth signals weakening.
Any leadership uncertainty at the Fed historically results in higher long-end yields due to perceived policy drift or political bias.
Safe Havens and Gold Dynamics:
Gold fell 0.2% to $3,324/oz, losing some haven allure post-ceasefire.
Continued outflows are expected unless inflation data surprises to the upside or Fed intervention appears politically constrained.
Equity Markets:
S&P 500 closed just under its all-time high, up 0.6%.
Risk-on sentiment is heavily liquidity-driven, with AI optimism (led by Nvidia) adding a secondary tailwind.
Oil and Inflation:
Brent crude rebounded to $68.49/bbl, up 1.2%, despite subdued supply risk.
Inflation-linked assets remain moderately priced, but any disruption to the Strait of Hormuz or further US-China escalation could reignite tail-risk pricing.
Practical Implications:
Dollar weakness can spur a rotation into EM equities, gold, and real assets.
Investors should brace for increased FX volatility and repricing of global rate differentials.
Portfolios with high USD exposure may benefit from increased geographical diversification.
TIPS and short-duration Treasuries become more attractive as stagflation hedges in case Powell is replaced with a dovish successor.
Gold Breaks Trendline – Deeper Correction Ahead?Gold (XAUUSD) has just broken below its short-term ascending trendline formed since mid-May. The candle closed around $3,333, confirming a bearish engulfing pattern and highlighting growing selling pressure after multiple failed attempts to reclaim the $3,383–$3,399 resistance zone (Fibonacci 0.5–0.618).
Key Levels to Watch:
- Immediate Support: $3,315 (tested twice before)
- Main Resistance: $3,383–$3,399 (Fibonacci zone)
- Major Resistance: $3,435–$3,451 (May high zone)
If $3,315 fails to hold, gold could retest $3,285–$3,270, with deeper downside toward $3,222.
Technical Overview:
- The ascending trendline is now broken.
- Bearish engulfing candlestick confirms momentum shift.
- Price rejected sharply from Fibonacci 0.618 – $3,399.
Trade Setups to Consider:
Sell Opportunity: Short near $3,360–$3,383; stop loss above $3,400; targets at $3,315 and $3,270.
Speculative Buy: Watch for reversal patterns near $3,315; stop loss below $3,300; short-term target $3,350–$3,365.
Caution: This week brings major U.S. economic events (GDP, PCE, Fed speeches). Trade reactively, manage risk tightly, and avoid overleveraging.
THE KOG REPORT - Update End of day update from us here at KOG:
Well, we actually did want higher but there was no break above, instead, we got the break below and then the move commenced overnight, most of which we missed. We did capture part of it on the tap and bounce, then another trade now on a RIP from lower Excalibur which was hit. Not bad, not amazing, just another day on the markets.
Now, we have support at the 3310-6 level with resistance at 3330 which could be the target over the sessions to come. As long as support holds, we'll hold as well.
As always, trade safe.
KOG
Gold Under Pressure As Dollar StrengthenGold remains under pressure after a false breakout at $3,350, as the dollar's sudden strength dominates the market. Despite Powell's slightly dovish tone, Tuesday's PMI and JOLTs job data favored the dollar, keeping the market in limbo. Technically, gold has established a new range between $3,350 and $3,300. A drop to the lower end of this range could spark short-term buying opportunities. With the ADP numbers on the horizon, the market awaits further cues.
XAUUSD 15min – Bearish Setup | Short Trade Plan Below 3328Price action on Gold (XAUUSD) is showing signs of exhaustion near the 3,328 resistance zone, where we anticipate potential bearish rejection. A short opportunity may unfold once confirmation occurs below the key structural level of 3316.
Sell Trade Setup:
🔹 Primary Entry (Sell Entry 1):
📍 Zone: Around 3,328.29
📌 Reaction expected near major supply & resistance zone.
🔹 Confirmation Entry (Sell Entry 2):
📍 Below 3,316
📌 Break below structure may trigger bearish momentum.
Targets:
🎯 TP 1: 3,296.97 (Initial reaction zone)
🎯 TP 2: 3,276.64 (Mid support/EMA cross zone)
🎯 TP 3: 3,259.88 (Key structural support)
🎯 Extended TP:
3,243.94 (Re-entry confirmation level)
3,225.53 (Prior base structure)
3,202.45 (Final target if strong momentum follows)
3,159.31 (Ultimate low if sellers dominate trend)
Re-Entry Plan:
🔄 If price retraces after TP 3, watch for rejection at 3,243.94 to re-enter short toward the next levels.
Confluence Factors:
✔ 45° TPC angle supports bearish path
✔ Structure break expected below 3316
✔ EMA resistance and trendline rejection from upper zone
✔ Volatility cluster observed near 3,328 – ideal for trap setup
Bias:
Bearish below 3,316 – Expecting a downward continuation if structure confirms breakdown.
Author:
📅 1 July 2025
📊 Chart: XAUUSD – 15min
🧠 Shared by: @THEPATELCRYPTO
XAUUSD📉 The Setup: Bullish Divergence on XAUUSD (15m/30m)
Buy only on Breakout
🔍 Observation:
On the 30-minute timeframe, price made a lower low while the RSI indicator printed a higher low — classic sign of bullish divergence 🔄.
💡 Translation: Bears are losing steam! Bulls may be preparing to charge in! 🐂⚡
📊 Trade Plan – Long Entry
Smart Money Concepts or Inner Circle Trade methodologies.Key Zones and Annotations
FVG (Fair Value Gap) – Marked in green:
Represents an imbalance in price (gap between candles).
Price often returns here to “fill” or mitigate that inefficiency.
BSL (Buy-Side Liquidity) – Marked in blue near the $3,340 area:
Indicates an area above recent highs where stop-losses (liquidity) might be resting.
This area is often targeted before reversals.
SSL (Sell-Side Liquidity) – Marked in red near the $3,270 area:
Represents liquidity below recent lows.
This is a potential bearish target.
Structure Labels
LL (Lower Low), LH (Lower High), HH (Higher High), HL (Higher Low):
Used to track market structure direction (bearish/bullish trend).
ChoCH (Change of Character):
Indicates a shift in market structure, typically a sign of a trend reversal.
Price Projection
The projected path shows a short-term move upward toward the BSL region (~$3,340), suggesting liquidity grab or premium pricing area.
Then, a bearish reversal is projected targeting the SSL zone (~$3,270), suggesting a potential drop after the BSL is taken.
Conclusion
The chart suggests a short-term bullish move to clear buy-side liquidity followed by a bearish continuation targeting lower liquidity zones. This type of analysis is commonly used in Smart Money Concepts (SMC) or ICT (Inner Circle Trader) methodologies.
Gold Weekly Recap – Week 27 (30 Jun – 04 Jul)🟡 XAUUSD | MJTrading
Overview
Gold (XAUUSD) staged a significant recovery this week after retesting a critical support zone. Price action reflected strong buying interest at lower levels, followed by consolidation near mid-range resistance.
🔹 Key Levels:
Strong Support Zone: 3,246 – 3,250
Weekly Low: 3,246.35 (30 June)
Weekly High: 3,365.77 (3 July)
Closing Price: ~3,343
🔹 Price Action Summary:
✅ Early Week Retest & Reversal
After the prior week’s decline, gold opened the week near the major support area around 3,246. This zone acted as a strong demand pocket, triggering a swift rejection and initiating a bullish reversal.
✅ Sustained Rally to Resistance
Price climbed steadily, riding the 15-period EMA to reach the weekly high of 3,365.77 on 3 July. This move represented a nearly 4% recovery off the lows, fueled by renewed safe-haven flows and short covering.
✅ Midweek Consolidation
Following the rally, gold entered a sideways consolidation phase between 3,340 and 3,365. EMA flattening reflected a pause in momentum as traders assessed the next directional catalyst.
✅ Late-Week Pullback
Toward the end of the week, price tested the 3,310–3,320 area before modestly bouncing into the Friday close. Overall, the market maintained a cautiously bullish tone while holding above the prior support.
🔹 Technical Perspective:
🔸 Bias: Cautiously Bullish
Price defended the strong support and printed a higher low structure.
Sustained closes above 3,300 maintain the bullish outlook.
🔸 Near-Term Resistance:
3,365–3,390 remains the immediate supply zone to monitor for breakout attempts.
🔸 Key Support:
The 3,246–3,250 area continues to be the primary downside line in the sand.
🔹 Special Note – 4th July US Bank Holiday
Trading volumes were notably lighter on Thursday, 4th July, due to the US Independence Day holiday. This contributed to reduced liquidity and muted volatility, with many traders and institutions off desks. The thinner market conditions likely influenced the late-week pullback and consolidation, as participation was limited heading into the weekend.
🔹 Sentiment & Outlook
The decisive rebound from support suggests that buyers are defending value zones aggressively. However, failure to close the week above 3,365 leaves gold vulnerable to another retest of mid-range levels if fresh catalysts don’t emerge.
Traders should watch for:
A clean breakout above 3,365 to confirm continuation higher.
Any sustained weakness below 3,300 as a signal of fading bullish momentum.
🧭 Next Week’s Focus:
Monitoring whether the consolidation evolves into accumulation or distribution.
Watching for a breakout or deeper pullback
Reactions to upcoming economic data
EMA alignment: If the 15 EMA continues to track above the 60 EMA, it supports a bullish bias.
Chart Notes:
The main chart highlights this week’s action, while the inset provides a fortnight overview of the broader decline and recovery for context.
Thank you for your time and your support...
🚀🚀Boost it if you like it (Thanks)🚀🚀
#Gold #XAUUSD #GoldTrading #Forex #Commodities #TechnicalAnalysis #PriceAction #TradingRecap #MJTrading #GoldForecast #MarketReview #WeeklyRecap #TradingView
GOLD The ADP Non-Farm Employment Change for July 2,have a forecast of 99,000 jobs, compared to the previous month’s very weak result of 37,000—the lowest since March 2023. The ADP National Employment Report is a monthly indicator that tracks changes in non-farm private sector employment in the US, based on anonymized payroll data from ADP’s clients, covering about one-fifth of all US private employment.
Who is responsible?
The report is produced by the ADP Research Institute, part of Automatic Data Processing (ADP), in partnership with the Stanford Digital Economy Lab.
Why it matters:
The ADP report is viewed as a leading indicator for the official Non-Farm Payrolls (NFP) report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), released two days later.
It provides early insight into US private sector job growth and labor market health, and significant deviations from forecasts can move financial markets.
Note that the ADP report covers only private sector jobs, not government employment, so its numbers can differ from the official NFP.
Summary Table:
Report Date Forecast Previous Responsible Department
July 2, 2025 99,000 37,000 ADP Research Institute (ADP)
In summary:
The ADP Non-Farm Employment Change report, produced by the ADP Research Institute, forecasted a rebound to 99,000 jobs in June after a very weak 37,000 in May, providing an early signal on the health of US private sector employment.
(2)US10Y drops to historical low to 4.193% and currently broken 1hr descending trendline at 4.281% ,4.3% resistance will be watched for breakout buy bond buyers.
(3) DXY Key Points:
The DXY measures the US dollar’s strength against a basket of six major currencies: the euro (57.6% weight), Japanese yen (13.6%), British pound (11.9%), Canadian dollar (9.1%), Swedish krona (4.2%), and Swiss franc (3.6%).
After peaking near 110.075$ in January 2025, the index has softened , trading near 96.600-101.966.on weekly TF 101.966 was a retest to broken weekly demand floor .
The dollar’s decline reflects market expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts later in 2025, easing inflation pressures, and some geopolitical easing.
the DXY to rebound will henge and depend on Fed policy and global economic conditions.
GOLD buyers are watching for the direction of trade ,
Chinese Demand and Policy:
China is one of the largest gold consumers and holders. Domestic demand, central bank gold purchases, and monetary policy in China heavily influence XAU/RMB. If China’s economy slows or trade tensions with the US worsen, demand for gold as a safe haven may increase, supporting XAU/RMB even if the dollar is strong.
China's recent opening of the Shanghai Gold Exchange's (SGE) first offshore gold vault in Hong Kong on June 26, 2025, represents a significant development with potential, albeit indirect, implications for XAU/USD (gold priced in US dollars) .
Key Aspects of the Hong Kong Gold Vault:
Location and Operation: The vault is located in Hong Kong and operated by Bank of China's Hong Kong unit .
Yuan-Denominated Trading: All transactions and settlements in the vault are denominated exclusively in yuan, either via cash or physical bullion delivery . Two new yuan-denominated gold trading contracts were launched alongside the vault .
Strategic Objectives:
Increased Influence on Gold Pricing: China, as the world's leading gold producer and consumer, aims to gain greater control and influence over global gold pricing mechanisms .
Yuan Internationalization: The initiative seeks to accelerate the international usage of the yuan, supporting China's broader de-dollarization efforts . This allows China to import gold in yuan, reducing reliance on the US dollar for commodity trading .
Enhanced Global Reach: The vault expands the SGE's physical infrastructure beyond mainland China, creating a new gateway for international gold trading and solidifying Hong Kong's role as a key financial hub .
Physical Settlement: It facilitates the physical settlement of gold contracts outside mainland China .
Implications for XAU/USD:
While the new vault directly promotes yuan-denominated gold trading, its implications for XAU/USD are primarily indirect and long-term:
De-dollarization Efforts: By promoting yuan-denominated gold trading, China is actively working to reduce global reliance on the US dollar in commodity markets . If successful, a more diversified global gold trading landscape could gradually diminish the dollar's sole influence over gold prices, potentially leading to less direct inverse correlation between the dollar and gold .
Increased Demand and Liquidity: The vault aims to attract more international participants to yuan-denominated gold markets, potentially increasing overall gold demand and liquidity in the Asia-Pacific region . While this demand is primarily yuan-driven, a generally stronger global gold market could indirectly support XAU/USD .
stable tariffs, gold price impact reduction✍️ NOVA hello everyone, Let's comment on gold price next week from 06/30/2025 - 07/04/2025
⭐️GOLDEN INFORMATION:
Gold prices plunged over 1.5% on Friday as risk appetite strengthened, fueled by a combination of positive geopolitical and economic developments. Easing tensions between Israel and Iran, the formal trade agreement between the United States and China, and continued efforts by Washington to strike new commercial deals with global partners lifted market sentiment—dampening demand for safe-haven assets like bullion.
At the time of writing, XAU/USD is trading at $3,274, having pulled back from an earlier high of $3,328. On Thursday, the White House confirmed the signing of a long-awaited trade pact with China, marking an official end to the protracted trade war. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick also indicated that additional agreements may be finalized ahead of the July 9 deadline
⭐️Personal comments NOVA:
Information on tariff negotiations is gradually becoming stable and favorable. Information on inflation showing signs of increasing, dxy increase is also a temporary pressure causing gold price to return to the 3200 mark.
🔥 Technically:
Based on the resistance and support areas of the gold price according to the H4 frame, NOVA identifies the important key areas as follows:
Resistance: $3307, $3348, $3390
Support: $3248, $3202
🔥 NOTE:
Note: Nova wishes traders to manage their capital well
- take the number of lots that match your capital
- Takeprofit equal to 4-6% of capital account
- Stoplose equal to 2-3% of capital account
- The winner is the one who sticks with the market the longest
Gold at Key Level Before NFP – Big Move Loading ?📉 Fundamental Analysis
Gold remains in a strong bullish structure, supported by multiple macroeconomic and political drivers:
ADP Employment Report Missed Expectations: With a shocking -33K reading, market sentiment shifted firmly against the US Dollar, pushing gold higher.
Fed’s Easing Outlook: Markets are now pricing in a 90% probability of a rate cut in Q3, weakening real yields and supporting demand for gold.
Trump’s “Super Bill” Momentum: Political cohesion among Republicans has re-ignited fiscal stimulus expectations, fuelling concerns over long-term US debt sustainability—another tailwind for gold as a safe haven.
🧠 Smart Money Technical Framework (H1)
Price has moved into a Premium FVG Zone, showing signs of potential exhaustion after forming a clear CHoCH and bullish BOS. The current zone (3,375 – 3,376) aligns with a mid-risk sell region, where price may experience short-term rejection before revisiting demand zones.
Market structure suggests liquidity sweep potential towards the downside before any continuation of the larger bullish trend.
📊 Trading Strategy – Smart Money Zones & Key Levels
🔵 BUY SCALP: 3,334 – 3,333
🔴 SL: 3,329
✅ TP: 3,340 → 3,344 → 3,350 → 3,360
🔵 BUY ZONE LOW RISK: 3,317 – 3,316
🔴 SL: 3,311
✅ TP: 3,320 → 3,325 → 3,330 → 3,336 → 3,345 → 3,350 → 3,360
🔴 SELL SCALP ZONE: 3,375 – 3,376
🔴 SL: 3,380
✔️ TP: 3,370 → 3,366 → 3,360 → 3,355 → 3,350
🔴 SELL ZONE HIGH PROBABILITY: 3,388 – 3,390
🔴 SL: 3,394
✔️ TP: 3,384 → 3,380 → 3,376 → 3,370 → 3,366 → 3,360
📌 Notes:
Be cautious ahead of NFP data and the upcoming US bank holiday—expect liquidity traps and sudden volatility.
This setup is ideal for intraweek scalping and liquidity-based reversals.
All trades follow Smart Money Concepts logic: premium vs. discount zones, CHoCH + BOS confirmations, and institutional order flow anticipation.
XAUUSD Today's strategyGold prices are consolidating around $3,350 today, with the current resistance level above seen at $3,370 and the support level below at $3,340.
From a technical perspective, the 4-hour chart shows an ascending triangle pattern, with the bottom gradually lifting. If the price can effectively break through the $3,370 resistance, it is expected to subsequently launch an assault on the $3,400 integer mark. In terms of technical indicators, the RSI currently stands at 58, which has not yet entered the severely overbought range, suggesting there is still room for upward movement; the MACD indicator also shows that bullish momentum is slowly recovering, waiting for a breakout signal to confirm the direction.
On the operational front, considering going long around $3,340 could be a viable option. It is particularly important to note that the U.S. non-farm payroll data will be released today, which may have a significant impact on the short-term trend of gold. It is advisable to liquidate positions and wait on the sidelines before the data release to avoid potential risks from sharp fluctuations.
XAUUSD
buy@3335-3345
tp:3360-3370
I am committed to sharing trading signals every day. Among them, real-time signals will be flexibly pushed according to market dynamics. All the signals sent out last week accurately matched the market trends, helping numerous traders achieve substantial profits. Regardless of your previous investment performance, I believe that with the support of my professional strategies and timely signals, I will surely be able to assist you in breaking through investment bottlenecks and achieving new breakthroughs in the trading field.
Gold Sell- look for sell
- Refine entry with smaller SL for better RR, if you know how
- keep looking for sell even if price goes one more up
A Message To Traders:
I’ll be sharing high-quality trade setups for a period time. No bullshit, no fluff, no complicated nonsense — just real, actionable forecast the algorithm is executing. If you’re struggling with trading and desperate for better results, follow my posts closely.
Check out my previously posted setups and forecasts — you’ll be amazed by the high accuracy of the results.
"I Found the Code. I Trust the Algo. Believe Me, That’s It."
XAUUSD - SELL After a reasonable big run up like this they will take profits
Looks like it's roiling over watching Super Trend and break of
Buffer Zone with Bearish Continuation Candle can easily Shoot back up if Wicks but should be plenty of room to make money on this one.
Hardest part is being patient
Selling seems to capitulate everyone wants to capture as much profit as possible or should I say Algo's
NY also current session so they have plenty of push and Greedy as can be !
USD has turned Strong for now also
Don't forget to protect profits when you deem fit should it run into profit trading Forex - Gold is very unpredictable their game is to take yr money deliberately - do the opposite just to snag yr hard earned cash.
Lets See : )