Cryptos_Ltc2017

Cryptos_Ltc2017

This token fk me so hard. Yeah, people bought at low price dump on us. The listing on the big exchanges is just a way to help more liquidity for selling. Not blame to this tokens, but Big Exchanges are just a fuckin* as*hole!

Cryptos_Ltc2017

This is not a financial advice! Aleo will do something during the uptrend: - It has some great backers with huge fundraising. - It may had a bottom at around $1.1 - It has potential to get listing on other major exchanges. Huge Win So #DYOR

Cryptos_Ltc2017 Updated 

Not financial advice. Do your own research! 1. Devs made proposal to UNLOCK 10 millions #SEAM to dump on the market. 2. Check Seamless protocol twitter (X), it recently remove bio and lose "blue sticker". Overview: a. Seamless Protocol has relatively low liquidity. b. The Total Value Locked (TVL) has been continuously decreasing due to a lack of users. c. The...

Cryptos_Ltc2017 Updated 

My previous prediction is so true when it came to $1.X. Now this is my new prediction for this project: $0.1 Here are some major reasons: 1. NYSE:WELL (moomwell) on BASE is big competitor in lending & borrowing. It has high TVL. Massive backers (Coinbase). Huge funding rounds. 2. $Seam doesn’t have anything above. 3. $Seam with no users, low demands, tokens...

Cryptos_Ltc2017

Memes season Q4. If it doesn’t pump I will fud this shjt every day 🤡

Cryptos_Ltc2017

Devs have deleted all information about their funding rounds from the official website, raising significant doubts about the project's transparency. They hired social media influencers to promote the project and deceive investors, using services to artificially boost likes, comments, and shares. This manipulates public perception, making the project appear more...

Cryptos_Ltc2017

Several reasons that this project tends to rug pull: 1. Fake data of their ecosystem ( no real users ) 2. Bought “ like, share, comments” on their X account (dirty marketing) 3. Devs had to return funds to their backer ( seed & private round) In order to adopt devs, they need a lot money => mint tokens => selling for profits Not financial advice and DYOR

Cryptos_Ltc2017 Updated 

This project is unstable. Coingecko showed CSE:LRDS devs team coded their token is mineable. Tokenomics of this project is designed to dump when vesting for their investors at the TGE. Seed round bought at $0.4x with a liner unlocked at TGE and currently the value of #LRDS is $1.4 => massive dumping. Expected to $0.6 Will it be the first rugpull on coinbase...

Cryptos_Ltc2017 Updated 

Here is what you expected from a Vietnamese project.

Cryptos_Ltc2017 Updated 

Based on the current market of layer 2. AMEX:ARB is about $7.88 Billion in FDV, high TVL NASDAQ:OP = $7.66 Billion in FDV, high TVL NYSE:ZK = $3.89 Billion in FDV, low TVL $Blast = $2.15 Billion in FAV, low TVL We can see that Starknet ( IDX:STRK ) has lack of community, but has $6.66 Billion in FDV is to high for a new project. It also has a bad tokenomics...

Cryptos_Ltc2017 Updated 

This project has devs from Asian (+ Vietnamese) where a strong background of scam, fraudulent, money laundering. They can rug pull on you for a penny, so it’s risky to invest in these type of project. One thing that the team did that make me feel bad about their development is they bought fake “like, comments, and repost” on social media (X & coinmarketcap) to...

Cryptos_Ltc2017

One of the lead investors is Three Narrow Capital related to FTX collapse. Vesting schedule is about unlock for Investors. It was listed on Coinbase because it likely list tokens that related to FTX, in order to help them take liquidity to cover huge funds from FTX. It is simple a massive selling pressure coming

Cryptos_Ltc2017 Updated 

I’ve been in this Crypto markets since 2016. From my experiences, most of projects related to Lending/borrowing will dramatically dump after the launch. The core of these kind of projects is about encouraging users participate in the protocol to receive rewards. They will charge gas fee as ETH, not their governance tokens. Thus, token emission is high inflation =>...

Cryptos_Ltc2017 Updated 

Pros: Starknet is good techs, gaint backers, and it draws incredible goals :) Cons: F*k Devs, unfair airdrops, bad tokenomics… bla bla.. So, if we have bullrun ss, it will pump, yes If we don’t have bullrun, 73% drop is fair entry, maybe quick pump 500% & slow dump like “Aptos” project. If we don’t have bullrun, it will sink, maybe /2 /3 fu*k their team again. I...

Cryptos_Ltc2017 Updated 

Nothing much to say, $pirate is just a game like many others on the cryptocurrency field, inflation tokenomic with about 25% of total supplies was released. Easy to see it drops from the listing. All I do is just waiting till it goes to $0.1 zone and dca if it dumps to $0.05 and I will take profit when it bounce back 50% or x2. Don’t expect too much on a game...

Cryptos_Ltc2017

Omni Network raised from VCs at $0.18 and $1.5 for a total of $18 million. FDV of this project is about $2 billion. OVERVALUED! => No potential From my insiders, although VCs have a one year locked for their tokens, but they can borrow from project to make early sellings => High risk It is a money game, #DYOR

Cryptos_Ltc2017

$SHDW has big cap & small usecases. All tokens are almost unlocked -> no momentum for devs to build. Top Wallets on Solanascan are distributing #shdw to CEXs. Right now, Coinbase still keeps "limit-only" mode . It is so weird that they are not open full-trading for this project. It is a big problem that high possibility coinbase will delist it in near future....

Cryptos_Ltc2017

The tokenomics of this project is so weird. Many time the price dump but its marketcap increased. It’s not good for a project as lack of transparency. About technical analysis, you can see the selling is unstoppable. Fake pump with small volume to trap investors then dump it with heavy volume. Many projects getting listed on Coinbase then dump hard about 80-90%,...