Theory says: a zig zag wave has a 5 (A) - 3 (B) - 5 (C) structure This might sound obvious for some, but was a deadly trap for me: - the 5 wave up/down structure of a zig zag does not folluw the same rules of a 5 wave structure of an impulse wave.
Short descend before upward target?
XBTEUR elliott wave count with next short-term target.
Wave count of the 15min time frame. Best to view on a 5min time frame, but Tradingview does not allow to publish on a time frame smaller than 15min.
Next short term target based on Elliott wave and pitchfork.
Next short term target of BTCEUR before the final descend.
Which scenario is most likely: - the orange wave WXYXZ, where wave Z is 2/3 completed? - the blue wave ABC, where smaller wave c is still to start? Note the similarity of waves WXY with the sub-waves of Z is remarkable. End of wave Z is plotted with the same proportions as waves WXY.
Elliott Wave breakdown of the very last wave.
Elliott Wave analysis applied on the 1 hour BTCUSD chart (kraken). Current B wave consists of wxy, which in turn is a flat: 3 (ABC) -3 (ABC) -5 (WXYXZ) Y is at 100% of w. Based on this, the descend should be completed and the ascend should commence already.
Elliott Wave analysis applied on the 4 hour BTCUSD chart (kraken). The ABC wave is a ZIGZAG: - wave A contains 5 waves up - wave B contains wxy waves correction, which should be completed (wave y is now 100% of wave w). Also, B is now at 85.4% of wave A. If descending any further, the whole ZIGZAG wave is no longer applicable. - thus, wave C is now expected to...