Get started

Beyond Technical Analysis

Liquidity Heatmap – May 27, 2025 (Tuesday) Liquidity Heatmap – May 27, 2025 (Tuesday) Session-by-session liquidity pressure zones – Cairo time time to drop the Liquidity Heatmap for tomorrow, based on your chart + market structure context (post-holiday + kill zones + golden zones) ⸻ 1. Asia (2 AM – 9 AM Cairo) • Initial Sweep Zone: Target: 3,326 – 3,323 (Golden Zone Friday) Expect smart money to dip below today’s NY low and sweep stops around VWAP • Liquidity Trigger: If price bounces from 3,324 and reclaims VWAP 3,337, Expect a pre-London reversal setup ⸻ 2. London (9 AM – 12 PM Cairo) • Build-Up Zone: Key Price Cluster: 3,339 – 3,349 (Monday VWAP to Tokyo High) London usually expands price out of Asia’s fakeout. • Liquidity Trap Watch: • Spike above 3,351 = liquidity bait • Fails to break 3,358 = shorts pile in ⸻ 3. NY Pre-Market (1 PM – 3:30 PM Cairo) • High-Risk Zone: • Price expected to hover between 3,349–3,358 • Could set up a final trap high at 3,358–3,365 before reversal ⸻ 4. NY Main Session (3:30 PM – 6 PM Cairo) • Kill Candle Zone Reaction: Range: 3,365 – 3,349 If NY drives up here, expect sharp rejection or full break → continuation • Liquidity Flush Zone (if bearish): If NY nukes it down → target 3,312.00 (low of Friday’s golden zone) ⸻ Visual Heatmap Layers (in price terms): Zone Range Description Trap Buy Zone 3,323 – 3,326 Stop sweep zone in Asia Liquidity Reclaim 3,337 – 3,342 VWAP reclaim base for long bias Expansion Zone 3,343 – 3,351 London price expansion zone Kill Candle Pressure 3,358 – 3,365 High-risk reversal trap Liquidity Dump Target 3,312 – 3,318 Max downside target (only if NY goes full bearish) ⸻ Xaumo Notes: • Volume confirmation key: No volume = no conviction • Kill Candle from Friday still rules: No clear close above = bear trap zone • Expect one fake move between Asia and London — smart money style ⸻ – ICHIMOKUontheNILE | Your liquidity map dealer
FX:XAUUSD
by ICHIMOKUontheNILE
1
TMGH Rebound ExpctationTMG Holding trend has reached its downward zone at the support line 51.142. In case of a rise, it is expected to breach the resistance line 51.233 and reach the resistance line at 51.625 points, then reach the third resistance line at 51.777 points. This upward direction is expected due to TMGH signs MoU For Development of New Large-Scale Mixed-Use Project In Iraq, which is expected to generate total sales of $17 Billion, and income of $1.5 Billion per annum upon project completion. In case of falling, it's expected to break the 1st support line at 50.961 points, then the second support line at 50.900, then the third line at 50.779.
EGX:TMGH
by RowaynaAhmed
US Gov Spending to Tax Revenues & Debt to GDPUS government spending is exceeding tax revenues by over 2:1, reaching extreme levels compared to historical norms and worsening rapidly More alarmingly, unlike past decades, the US government's total debt-to-GDP ratio is also rising sharply with no end in sight, accelerating in the wrong direction. For this reason, bond investors are currently demanding higher interest rates. Trump's tariffs, undermining trust in Gov, the economy, and markets, are creating conditions for a global currency crisis coupled with an economic recession or depression. If you think this information has no impact on your trading/investing, you are making a grave and possibly an expensive mistake. Click Boost, follow, and subscribe for more. Let's get to 5,000 followers. ))
FRED:FGEXPND
by RealMacro
SWDY Future ReboundSWDY stock is trying to peak up, but unfortunately, it's rebounding back from the resistance line 80.081. It had already broken the support line 78.989. In case of continuing, it'll break the support line 78.928 till reaching the support line 78.868. In case of rising, it'll breach the 1st resistance line at 79.199, the 2nd resistance line at 79.320, and the 3rd resistance line at 79.470, which is more recommended due to its Q1 Profit Rise, which achieved EGP 4.15 Billion versus EGP 3.98 Billion a year ago beside its Q1 revenue EGP 59.39 Billion versus EGP 45.25 Billion a year ago.
EGX:SWDY
by RowaynaAhmed
Xrp- a small case for upsideRipple is a coin that is loved fervently by retail and despised vehemently by crypto natives. People who spend the bear market in the trenches tend to avoid it due to skepticism about FDV and other metrics and then retail comes in for a blip in time and pumps it to Valhalla and dumps on crypto natives and leaves without explaining. If bitcoin hits 250k , retail is coming back and pumping this to $9. Downside : price is currently trending near previous ATH of 2018 so there's a risk of double top and crash to 50¢ Upside : dark days are behind us. Why zoom out more than necessary. Worst is behind us. We're in an uptrend. minor downside : oh no, we zoomed in too hard and the chart seems to be in a downtrend. well it doesn't matter unless you're high leveraged . Zoom out moderately, relax for a bit, and wait for retail to arrive.
BITSTAMP:XRPUSDLong
by niggy
GOLD next Amid Bullish ExpectedXAUUSD Trading Setup lets we see how the price will react? Gold is strengthening and moving towards the upper boundary of its current trading range, supported by weakening USD fundamentals. The local trend is bullish, underpinned by fundamental factors favouring gold as a safe-haven asset. The U.S. Dollar is under pressure, which is lending support to gold prices. The local trend is set by a fundamental backdrop favouring gold’s rise Gold is heading towards key resistance levels, signalling potential for further upside. Key Levels to Watch: Resistance: 3385 / 3415 Support: 3350 / 3335 you may find more details in the Chart. Ps Support with like and comments for more analysis Thanks.
OANDA:XAUUSDLong
by MrMartin_11
1
#AN002 Latest World News and Forex Impact Hello, I'm Forex Trader Andrea Russo and today I want to talk about how recent global geopolitical tensions are radically changing the international currency balance. In Forex, every crisis is a map of opportunities, but only those who analyze the global context can truly understand where capital will move. In this article, we analyze the main events of the week and reflect on how they could affect currencies in the coming days. 🇮🇳🇵🇰 India and Pakistan: risk of escalation across the border After a terrorist attack in Kashmir that caused 26 civilian casualties, India launched “Operation Sindoor” targeting extremist groups across the border. Pakistan responded militarily with “Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos”. Both countries used drones and cruise missiles. Despite a ceasefire declared on May 10, the truce is fragile. The risk of a tactical nuclear crisis is real today. 🔍 Forex Impact: Strong pressure on the Indian rupee (USD/INR up) and increased demand for safe haven currencies such as CHF and JPY. 🇵🇸🇮🇱 Israel-Gaza: urban warfare resumes Israeli operations in the Gaza Strip have intensified, aiming for complete control of the area. Hundreds of civilian casualties have been reported. Italy and other members of the Madrid+ Group are calling for a ceasefire, proposing an Arab plan for reconstruction. 🔍 Forex Impact: In the acute phase, gold (XAU/USD) and the US dollar are strengthening. The NIS (Israeli shekel) is showing signs of weakness, especially if the conflict extends to Lebanon or Syria. 🇺🇦🇷🇺 Ukraine-Russia: is a glimmer of hope opening up again? Donald Trump spoke by phone with Vladimir Putin and other international leaders, including Giorgia Meloni, proposing the Vatican as a venue for new negotiations. Although the war continues mainly in Zaporizhzhia and the eastern region, diplomacy is back on the table. 🔍 Forex Impact: If the talks materialize, the EUR/USD could strengthen. If not, instability will further favor safe-haven currencies and weakness of the euro. 🇧🇫 Burkina Faso: the forgotten war The jihadist group JNIM has carried out coordinated attacks in several cities in the north of the country, causing dozens of deaths and temporarily conquering the city of Djibo. The humanitarian crisis is worsening and the Sahel region remains among the most unstable in the world. 🔍 Forex Impact: Direct impacts marginal, but emerging African currencies continue to suffer from systemic instability and capital flight. 🇺🇸🇨🇳 US and China: new economic frictions The second Trump administration has imposed new duties on Chinese products, exacerbating trade relations. The European Union, meanwhile, is seeking rebalancing by strengthening ties with Beijing. The global context is once again multipolar. 🔍 Impact on Forex: USD still strong in the short term, but growing tensions with China could weaken the USD/CNH and strengthen the CNY if Beijing responds with targeted monetary stimulus. ✝️ Vatican and new spiritual diplomacy The new Pope, Leo XIV, is prioritizing migration and poverty. The Vatican proposes itself as a neutral venue for peace mediations, as in the Ukraine-Russia case. The Church returns to being a geopolitical actor. 🔍 Impact on Forex: Symbolic but relevant: the idea of ​​Rome as a diplomatic center strengthens the perceived stability of the euro area. 📉 Italian GDP: growth slows According to ISTAT, Italian GDP is falling in 2025. The causes? Industrial slowdown, residual inflation and uncertain global climate. However, public accounts are improving and employment remains stable. 🔍 Impact on Forex: EUR under pressure awaiting new ECB estimates. The spread remains under observation. 🧭 Final reflection: Forex and geopolitics, an inseparable pair Geopolitical tensions are not background noise, but waves that move billions. Smart traders don't just read charts: they read the world. The fragility of international relations and ongoing conflicts will lead to a new polarization of Forex: on one side, safe haven currencies (JPY, CHF, USD in shock phases), on the other, emerging and cyclical currencies that are increasingly vulnerable. Those who want to navigate this market must be prepared to react not to data, but to events that change data.
Education
by Andrea_Russo_SwipeUP
Oil Prices Up as Trump Delays EU Tariffs (Temporary Relief?) The global oil market, a sensitive barometer of economic health and geopolitical stability, registered a slight uptick in prices following the news that the Trump administration would extend the deadline for imposing new tariffs on a range of European Union goods. This minor rally, however, comes against a backdrop of a broader downtrend that has characterized the oil markets since mid-January. The persistent downward pressure has been largely attributed to the chilling effect of existing and threatened tariffs, not just between the US and the EU, but on a global scale, which have cast a long shadow over the outlook for global energy demand. To understand the significance of this deadline extension and its nuanced impact on oil prices, it's crucial to first appreciate the environment in which it occurred. For several months, the dominant narrative surrounding oil has been one of demand-side anxiety. President Trump's "America First" trade policy, which has seen the imposition of sweeping tariffs on goods from various countries, most notably China, and the persistent threat of more to come against allies like the European Union, has injected a significant dose of uncertainty into the global economic system. Tariffs, at their core, are taxes on imported goods. Their imposition typically leads to a cascade of negative economic consequences. Businesses that rely on imported components face higher input costs, which can either be absorbed, thereby reducing profit margins, or passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. Higher consumer prices can dampen spending, a key driver of economic growth. Furthermore, the uncertainty created by an unpredictable trade policy environment often leads businesses to postpone investment decisions and hiring, further stagnating economic activity. This economic slowdown, or even the fear of it, directly translates into weaker demand for oil. Manufacturing activity, a significant consumer of energy, tends to decline. Global shipping and freight, which rely heavily on bunker fuel and diesel, slow down as trade volumes shrink. Consumer demand for gasoline and jet fuel can also wane if economic hardship leads to reduced travel and leisure activities. The retaliatory measures often taken by targeted nations – imposing their own tariffs on US goods – only serve to exacerbate this negative feedback loop, creating a tit-for-tat escalation that further erodes business confidence and global trade flows. It is this overarching concern about a tariff-induced global economic slowdown that has been weighing heavily on oil prices since the middle of January. Market participants, from large institutional investors to commodity traders, have been pricing in the potential for significantly reduced oil consumption in the months and years ahead if these trade disputes were to escalate or become entrenched. Every new tariff announcement or threat has typically sent ripples of concern through the market, often pushing oil prices lower. Against this gloomy backdrop, the news of an extension to the tariff deadline on EU goods, while not a resolution, acts as a momentary pause button on further immediate escalation. It offers a temporary reprieve, a brief window where the worst-case scenario of new, damaging tariffs being instantly applied is averted. This is likely why oil prices "edged higher." The market's reaction can be interpreted in several ways. Firstly, it reflects a slight easing of immediate downside risk to the European economy. The EU is a massive economic bloc and a significant consumer of oil. The imposition of new US tariffs on key European goods, such as automobiles or luxury products, would undoubtedly have a detrimental impact on European industries, potentially tipping already fragile economies closer to recession. An extension of the deadline pushes this immediate threat further down the road, offering a sliver of hope that a negotiated solution might yet be found, or at least that the economic pain is deferred. This deferral, however slight, can lead to a marginal upward revision of short-term oil demand expectations from the region. Secondly, the extension can be seen as a signal, however faint, that dialogue and negotiation are still possible. In the fraught world of international trade diplomacy, any indication that parties are willing to continue talking rather than immediately resorting to punitive measures can be interpreted positively by markets. It reduces, fractionally, the "uncertainty premium" that has been built into asset prices, including oil. However, it is crucial to temper any optimism. The fact that oil only "edged higher" rather than surged indicates the market's deep-seated caution. An extension is not a cancellation. The underlying threat of tariffs remains very much on the table. The fundamental disagreements that led to the tariff threats in the first place have not been resolved. Therefore, while the immediate pressure point has been alleviated, the chronic condition of trade uncertainty persists. The oil market is acutely aware that this extension could simply be a tactical move, buying time for political reasons without altering the fundamental trajectory of trade policy. If, at the end of the extended period, no agreement is reached and tariffs are indeed imposed, the negative impact on oil demand expectations would likely resurface with renewed force. The market is therefore likely to adopt a "wait and see" approach, with traders hesitant to make significant bullish bets based solely on a deadline postponement. Furthermore, the US-EU trade dynamic is just one piece of a larger global puzzle. The ongoing trade tensions with China, for instance, continue to be a major drag on global growth projections and, by extension, oil demand. Progress, or lack thereof, on that front often has a more substantial impact on oil prices than developments in the US-EU relationship, given the sheer scale of US-China trade and China's role as the world's largest oil importer. The slight rise in oil prices also needs to be seen in the context of other market-moving factors. Supply-side dynamics, such as OPEC+ production decisions, geopolitical events in major oil-producing regions like the Middle East, and fluctuations in US shale output, constantly interact with demand-side sentiment. A deadline extension on EU tariffs might provide a small boost, but it can be easily overshadowed by a surprise inventory build, an unexpected increase in OPEC production, or signs of weakening economic data from other major economies. In conclusion, the decision by the Trump administration to extend the tariff deadline on EU goods offered a moment of temporary relief to an oil market that has been under duress from trade war anxieties. This relief manifested as a marginal increase in oil prices, reflecting a slight reduction in immediate perceived risk to global economic activity and oil demand, particularly from Europe. However, this should not be mistaken for a fundamental shift in market sentiment or a resolution to the underlying trade disputes. The threat of tariffs remains, and the broader concerns about a global economic slowdown fueled by protectionist policies continue to loom large. The oil market's cautious reaction underscores the prevailing uncertainty, suggesting that while this extension provides a brief breathing space, the path ahead for oil prices will continue to be heavily influenced by the unpredictable currents of international trade policy.
TVC:USOIL
by bryandowningqln
Market next target --- Bearish Disruption Analysis 1. False Breakout Zone (Red Box Area): The price is revisiting the red box area (potential supply/resistance zone). If it fails to break and close above this zone convincingly, it may signal a bull trap. Previous attempts to push higher were rejected around this level, showing seller strength. 2. Lower High Formation Risk: The recent upward move might form a lower high compared to the high from the 25th. If price reverses below $33.30–$33.20, it could trigger more downside momentum, potentially targeting the $33.00 or even $32.80 level. 3. Volume Divergence: Notice the decline in volume as price attempts to rise. Lower buying volume may indicate weak bullish conviction, which increases the risk of a downturn. 4. Bearish Candlestick Reversal Pattern: If any bearish engulfing or shooting star candlestick forms near resistance, it would support a bearish reversal case.
TVC:SILVERLong
by Gold_Free_Signals
Privacy Coins Surge: Monero & Zcash Lead $10B Rally In the ever-dynamic and often boisterous world of cryptocurrency, where hype cycles can inflate and deflate valuations with breathtaking speed, a particular sector has been making significant strides, albeit with less fanfare than its more mainstream counterparts. Privacy coins, designed with the core tenet of offering users enhanced anonymity and transaction confidentiality, have been steadily gaining traction. Recently, this burgeoning niche has quietly crossed a significant milestone: a collective market capitalization exceeding $10 billion. Spearheading this charge are two of the most established and technologically distinct players in the privacy space: Monero (XMR) and Zcash (ZEC), both of which have recently shown notable activity on price charts, signaling growing investor interest and a potential re-evaluation of their intrinsic value. The concept of financial privacy is hardly new, yet its application in the digital realm, particularly on inherently transparent blockchains like Bitcoin’s, presents unique challenges. While Bitcoin transactions are pseudonymous (linked to addresses, not directly to real-world identities), the public nature of the ledger means that with enough analytical effort, transactions can often be traced and linked. Privacy coins aim to solve this by employing sophisticated cryptographic techniques to obscure sender and receiver identities, transaction amounts, and other metadata that could compromise user anonymity. Monero (XMR): The Standard-Bearer for Obligatory Privacy Monero, launched in 2014, has long been considered one of the most robust and uncompromising privacy coins. Its core philosophy revolves around the principle that privacy should be default and mandatory for all users and transactions. This is achieved through a multi-layered approach to obfuscation: 1. Ring Signatures: This technique allows a sender to sign a transaction amongst a group of other possible signers (decoys pulled from the blockchain), making it computationally infeasible to determine which member of the group actually authorized the transaction. The size of this "ring" enhances the ambiguity. 2. Stealth Addresses: For every transaction, a unique, one-time public address is generated for the recipient. This prevents linking multiple payments to the same recipient address, a common method for deanonymizing users on transparent blockchains. 3. Ring Confidential Transactions (RingCT): Implemented in 2017, RingCT obscures the amounts being transacted. While the network can cryptographically verify that no new coins are being created out of thin air (i.e., inputs equal outputs), the actual values remain hidden from public view. This combination ensures that Monero transactions offer a high degree of unlinkability (difficulty in proving two transactions are related) and untraceability (difficulty in determining the sender/receiver). This commitment to always-on privacy has made Monero a favorite among those who prioritize true financial anonymity, believing it essential for fungibility – the property where each unit of a currency is interchangeable with any other unit. If some coins can be "tainted" by their transaction history (as can happen on transparent ledgers), true fungibility is compromised. The recent positive performance of Monero on the charts could be attributed to several factors. There's a persistent underlying demand from users who genuinely require its privacy features. Furthermore, in an environment of increasing discussion around Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and heightened digital surveillance, assets that offer an alternative path to financial confidentiality may be seeing renewed interest. Zcash (ZEC): Optional Privacy with Cutting-Edge Cryptography Zcash, launched in 2016, takes a different approach to privacy, offering it as an option rather than a default setting. It utilizes a groundbreaking cryptographic technique known as zk-SNARKs (Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments of Knowledge). This allows one party (the prover) to prove to another party (the verifier) that a statement is true, without revealing any information beyond the validity of the statement itself. In Zcash, this translates to the ability to conduct fully "shielded" transactions. When a transaction moves from one shielded address (a "z-addr") to another, the sender, receiver, and amount are all encrypted on the blockchain, yet zk-SNARKs are used to prove that the transaction is valid according to the network's consensus rules (e.g., the sender had the funds, no double-spending occurred). Zcash also supports "transparent" addresses (t-addrs), which function similarly to Bitcoin addresses, with all transaction details publicly visible. Users can choose to transact transparently, from transparent to shielded, from shielded to transparent, or fully shielded. This optionality aims to provide flexibility and potentially cater to a broader range of users and regulatory environments, allowing for auditable transparency when desired, while still offering robust privacy when needed. The recent chart activity for Zcash might reflect growing appreciation for its sophisticated technology and its unique positioning. The development and improvement of zk-SNARKs are at the forefront of cryptographic research, and Zcash is a prime example of their real-world application. As the crypto space matures, there may be an increasing demand for solutions that can offer strong privacy while also providing pathways for selective disclosure or compliance, a balance Zcash aims to strike. Why the Quiet Surge to $10 Billion? The collective rise of privacy coins to a $10 billion market capitalization, while "quiet" relative to mainstream crypto narratives, is significant. Several undercurrents could be contributing to this growth: 1. Growing Awareness of Blockchain Transparency: As more individuals and institutions interact with cryptocurrencies, the implications of permanently public ledgers are becoming better understood. High-profile cases of blockchain analysis being used to track funds (for both legitimate and questionable purposes) highlight the lack of inherent privacy in many popular cryptocurrencies. 2. Desire for Financial Sovereignty: For some, the ability to transact privately is a fundamental aspect of financial freedom and sovereignty, akin to using physical cash. Privacy coins offer a digital equivalent. 3. Concerns Over Digital Surveillance: The increasing digitization of finance, coupled with discussions around government-issued digital currencies, has raised concerns about potential mass financial surveillance. This may drive some users towards privacy-preserving alternatives. 4. Maturation of Privacy Technology: The cryptographic techniques underpinning coins like Monero and Zcash have been developed, battle-tested, and refined over several years, increasing confidence in their efficacy. 5. Niche Use Cases: While sometimes controversial, privacy coins serve legitimate niche use cases, such as individuals in oppressive regimes needing to protect their financial activities, or businesses wanting to keep sensitive commercial transactions confidential from competitors. 6. Market Diversification: As the overall crypto market grows, investors may look to diversify into sub-sectors like privacy coins, especially if they perceive them as undervalued relative to their utility or technological innovation. The "Quiet" Aspect and Lingering Challenges Despite their technological sophistication and growing market cap, privacy coins operate in a somewhat contentious space, which contributes to their "quiet" ascent. 1. Regulatory Scrutiny: The primary challenge comes from regulators worldwide. Concerns that privacy coins can be used to facilitate illicit activities like money laundering or terrorist financing have led to increased scrutiny. Several exchanges have delisted privacy coins in certain jurisdictions to comply with KYC/AML (Know Your Customer/Anti-Money Laundering) regulations. This regulatory pressure can stifle adoption and create uncertainty. 2. Perception Issues: The association, whether fair or not, with illicit activities has created a perception challenge for the sector. While proponents argue that any financial tool can be misused and that privacy is a fundamental right, this narrative can be difficult to overcome. 3. Complexity: The advanced cryptography involved can make these coins less accessible to the average user compared to simpler cryptocurrencies. Explaining the nuances of ring signatures or zk-SNARKs is more challenging than explaining Bitcoin. 4. Development and Governance: Like all crypto projects, ongoing development, robust governance, and maintaining network security are crucial and require significant resources and community effort. The Significance of the $10 Billion Milestone Reaching a $10 billion collective market capitalization is a testament to the resilience and perceived value of the privacy coin sector. It indicates that despite regulatory headwinds and perception challenges, there is a substantial and growing demand for financial privacy in the digital age. While still a relatively small fraction of the total cryptocurrency market, it's a clear signal that a significant number of users and investors believe in the importance of these tools. This milestone provides a degree of validation for the developers, communities, and users who have championed the cause of digital financial privacy. Future Outlook The path forward for privacy coins like Monero and Zcash will likely remain complex. They will continue to navigate a challenging regulatory environment, engaging in an ongoing dialogue about the balance between privacy and law enforcement. Technological innovation will be key, not only in enhancing privacy features but also in improving user experience and potentially developing solutions that can address regulatory concerns without compromising core principles (as Zcash attempts with its optional transparency). Education will also play a vital role – helping the public and policymakers understand the legitimate needs for financial privacy and the capabilities and limitations of these technologies. The debate over financial privacy is far from over, but as Monero and Zcash move up and the sector surpasses the $10 billion mark, it's clear that the demand for confidential transactions is a persistent and growing force in the digital economy. The quiet surge may be a prelude to a louder conversation about the future of money and the fundamental right to privacy in an increasingly interconnected world.
KRAKEN:XMRUSDLong
by bryandowningqln
Market next move Original Analysis Summary: The chart shows a support area around the 3340 USD level. There are two bullish scenarios outlined with blue and yellow arrows, implying a price increase from the support zone. --- Disruption/Critical Analysis: 1. Overreliance on Short-Term Support: The chart assumes the marked support area will hold, but no confirmation (like a bullish candlestick pattern or strong buying volume) is evident yet. A break below that zone could lead to a bearish move instead. 2. Volume Weakness: Recent candles near the support zone are not backed by significantly increasing volume. This suggests weak buying interest, making the bullish forecast potentially over-optimistic. 3. No Consideration of Macroeconomic Events: The chart doesn't factor in fundamental drivers (like U.S. economic data, Fed announcements), which can easily invalidate technical patterns.
TVC:GOLDLong
by Gold_Free_Signals
Market next move Disruption of the Bullish Bias: 1. False Breakout Risk The area marked with a red rectangle might be showing signs of consolidation, but there's a possibility that the bullish breakout is a bull trap. Volume does not strongly confirm a breakout; note that the volume on the recent upward candles is not significantly higher than the surrounding bars — often a sign of weak buyer conviction. 2. Resistance Overhead BTC is approaching the psychological level of 110,000, which may act as resistance. Price action shows several small-bodied candles with wicks, indicating indecision or rejection from higher levels. 3. Bearish Divergence Potential If paired with RSI or MACD indicators (not visible in this image), there might be signs of bearish divergence — price making higher highs while the indicator makes lower highs. 4. Liquidity Sweep Scenario The recent wick into the highlighted zone could be a liquidity sweep — grabbing stop-losses before reversing downward. This would support a bearish move contrary to the bullish forecast. 5. Market Sentiment & Fundamentals Ignoring macro events such as Fed decisions, ETF movements, or regulatory news can be dangerous. If bearish news breaks out, technical setups can fail fast
BITSTAMP:BTCUSDLong
by Gold_Free_Signals
Bitcoin vs. Gold: Central Banks Pick Gold (Here's Why) The debate over the ultimate store of value has been reignited in the digital age. For centuries, gold, the immutable yellow metal, has been the bedrock of wealth preservation, the trusted haven in times of turmoil, and a core component of central bank reserves. In the last decade, a new contender has emerged: Bitcoin, the pioneering cryptocurrency, often touted as "digital gold." Yet, as the dust settles on initial exuberance and institutional scrutiny intensifies, a clear preference is emerging from the world's most conservative financial institutions. Central banks, the guardians of national wealth and financial stability, are overwhelmingly demonstrating their continued faith in gold, signaling that when it comes to the ultimate safe reserve, tradition and tangibility still trump technological novelty. The evidence for this preference is not merely anecdotal; it's etched in the consistent and accelerating trend of global gold accumulation by these institutions. In recent years, central banks have been on a gold buying spree, a phenomenon driven by a confluence of potent global factors. The shifting geopolitical landscape, characterized by increased tensions, trade disputes, and a move towards a more multipolar world, has spurred a desire for assets that are not tied to any single nation's political or economic fortunes. Policies emanating from major economic powers, including periods of heightened trade protectionism and shifting global alliances, have historically fanned uncertainty, prompting a flight to assets perceived as universally valuable and politically neutral – a role gold has fulfilled for millennia. Furthermore, concerns over the long-term value of major fiat currencies, particularly the U.S. dollar which has long dominated global reserves, are playing a significant role. Persistent fiscal deficits, expanding sovereign debt levels, and unprecedented monetary stimulus measures in various countries have led to an undercurrent of apprehension about potential currency devaluation. In such an environment, central banks are actively seeking to diversify their holdings and hedge against the erosion of purchasing power. Gold, with its intrinsic value and finite supply, offers a compelling alternative to holding ever-increasing amounts of fiat currency, whose value can be diluted by policy decisions. This strategic de-dollarization, or at least a diversification away from dollar-centric reserves, sees gold as a primary beneficiary. It is a tangible asset that sits outside the traditional financial system, offering a layer of insulation from the counterparty risks inherent in holding other nations' currencies or debt. In stark contrast to this institutional embrace of gold stands Bitcoin. While proponents champion its decentralized nature, its mathematically enforced scarcity, and its potential as an inflation hedge, its inherent characteristics currently make it a challenging proposition for central bank reserves. The most glaring issue is its extreme volatility. Bitcoin's price history is a rollercoaster of meteoric rises and precipitous falls. For an individual retail investor, this volatility might be a tolerable, even attractive, risk in pursuit of outsized returns. However, for a central bank, whose primary mandate includes capital preservation and maintaining financial stability, such wild price swings are anathema. Reserve assets must be relatively stable, liquid, and dependable. Bitcoin, in its current state, struggles to meet these criteria consistently. A significant allocation to Bitcoin could expose a nation's reserves to sudden and substantial losses, undermining public trust and potentially destabilizing its financial position. This volatility poses a tangible risk, not just theoretically, but as observed in the experiences of investors globally, including those in the U.S. While some have reaped fortunes, many others have faced considerable losses due to ill-timed investments or the market's unpredictable nature. Institutional investors, including those in the U.S., while showing increasing interest in Bitcoin as a speculative asset class or a small part of a diversified portfolio, still largely treat it with caution. The kind of deep, unwavering institutional trust that gold commands – built over centuries of proven performance as a store of value and a crisis hedge – has yet to be earned by Bitcoin. Gold’s market is deep, liquid, and well-understood, with established clearing and settlement mechanisms. Bitcoin's market infrastructure, while maturing, is still relatively nascent and fragmented compared to the centuries-old gold market. Beyond volatility, other factors hinder Bitcoin's adoption as a mainstream reserve asset for central banks. Regulatory uncertainty remains a significant hurdle. The global regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies is a patchwork of differing approaches, with some nations embracing innovation while others impose strict controls or outright bans. For central banks, which operate within stringent legal and regulatory frameworks, this lack of global consensus and clarity is a major deterrent. The operational risks associated with custody and security of digital assets at a sovereign scale are also non-trivial. While blockchain technology is inherently secure, managing private keys for billions of dollars' worth of Bitcoin requires sophisticated and untested protocols for institutions of this nature. Furthermore, the narrative of Bitcoin as "digital gold" sometimes overlooks fundamental differences. Gold is a physical commodity with diverse industrial and cultural uses, providing a baseline of demand beyond its monetary role. It is universally recognized and accepted, transcending technological barriers. Bitcoin’s value is derived primarily from its network effects, its code, and investor belief in its future utility and adoption. While powerful, these are different underpinnings than the tangible reality of physical gold bullion held in a central bank's vault. The actions of central banks speak volumes. While a handful of smaller nations or entities might experiment with Bitcoin, the overwhelming majority of major central banks, those that collectively manage the bulk of global reserves, have either remained silent on Bitcoin or have issued cautious warnings, all while steadily increasing their physical gold holdings. This isn't to say that Bitcoin has no future role or value. It may well continue to evolve as a speculative asset, a niche store of value for some, or a technology platform for new financial applications. However, the idea that it is poised to usurp gold's position in the vaults of central banks appears premature, if not fundamentally misguided, given its current attributes. In conclusion, the debate between Bitcoin and gold as the preferred store of value and reserve asset has a clear, if perhaps unexciting, winner in the eyes of the world's central banks. Faced with geopolitical instability, the specter of dollar devaluation, and the enduring need for reliable safe-haven assets, these institutions are doubling down on gold. Its long history, proven stability, tangibility, and lack of counterparty risk resonate deeply with their conservative mandates. Bitcoin's volatility, regulatory ambiguity, and operational complexities, while potentially surmountable in the distant future, currently render it unsuitable for the core reserve holdings of nations. While U.S. investors and others may grapple with Bitcoin's risk-reward profile, central banks have largely made their choice, and that choice, for now and the foreseeable future, remains firmly with the ancient, trusted allure of gold.
BITSTAMP:BTCUSDLong
by bryandowningqln
CEP Stock Trading Plan 2025-05-25CEP Stock Trading Plan (2025-05-25) Final Trading Decision Model Summaries DS Report Technicals mixed: short-term (30m) oversold vs. longer-term overbought. Key levels: support $46.00/$45.55; resistance $48.47/$53.00. Volume weak, VIX rising, no clear news catalyst. Conclusion: Neutral/No trade (55% confidence). LM Report Daily/weekly EMAs bullish; 30m EMAs slightly bearish. RSI daily ~64 (mildly overbought), 30m ~41 (neutral). VIX elevated, overall market sentiment moderately bullish. Recommends long at $46.50, SL $44.18, TP $51.15; size 2–3% account; 70% confidence. GK Report 30m mixed, daily & weekly strongly bullish. 30m RSI ~41 near oversold; daily RSI ~64; weekly RSI ~76. Support $45.55, resistance ~$49.95. Recommends long at $46.55, SL $45.55, TP $49.95; ~196 shares; 70% confidence. GM Report Dominant daily/weekly uptrend; 30m pullback offers dip entry. VIX rising to 22.3; weekly RSI overbought. Recommends long at $46.50, SL $44.70, TP $52.50; ~208 shares (1.5% risk); 70% confidence. CD Report Weekly/daily EMAs bullish; 30m oversold. Price near lower Bollinger band on 30m. Recommends long entry $46.00–$46.50, SL $43.50, TP $52.00–$53.00; position 5–8% account; 72% confidence. Agreement & Disagreement Agreement: Four models (LM, GK, GM, CD) favor a long entry. Daily and weekly trends are strongly bullish; short-term pullback (30m) viewed as a buying opportunity. Key support near $45.50–$46.00; resistance in $49.95–$53.00 range. Elevated VIX and extended weekly RSI as chief risks. Disagreement: DS recommends no trade, citing contradictory timeframe signals and parabolic exhaustion. Others agree on dip-buy strategy with defined risk parameters. Conclusion & Trade Plan Overall Direction: Moderately Bullish Recommended Trade: Long CEP shares Strategy: Buy shares directly; hold 3–4 weeks Position Sizing: Target 2–3% of account risk (e.g., 200 shares for a $100k account) Entry Timing: At market open Entry Price: $46.50 Stop Loss: $44.70 (≈4% below entry; just below 30m support) Take Profit: $52.50 (≈13% above entry; below $53 resistance) Confidence Level: 70% Key Risks & Considerations: Weekly RSI (~76) indicates overbought; potential sharp corrections. Elevated and rising VIX (22.3) suggests broader market volatility. Profit-taking in a parabolic 30-day +330% move. Must adhere strictly to stop-loss to avoid large drawdowns. TRADE_DETAILS (JSON Format) { "instrument": "CEP", "direction": "long", "entry_price": 46.50, "stop_loss": 44.70, "take_profit": 52.50, "size": 200, "confidence": 0.70, "entry_timing": "open" } 📊 TRADE DETAILS 📊 🎯 Instrument: CEP 📈 Direction: LONG 💰 Entry Price: 46.5 🛑 Stop Loss: 44.7 🎯 Take Profit: 52.5 📊 Size: 200 💪 Confidence: 70% ⏰ Entry Timing: open Disclaimer: This newsletter is not trading or investment advice but for general informational purposes only. This newsletter represents my personal opinions based on proprietary research which I am sharing publicly as my personal blog. Futures, stocks, and options trading of any kind involves a lot of risk. No guarantee of any profit whatsoever is made. In fact, you may lose everything you have. So be very careful. I guarantee no profit whatsoever, You assume the entire cost and risk of any trading or investing activities you choose to undertake. You are solely responsible for making your own investment decisions. Owners/authors of this newsletter, its representatives, its principals, its moderators, and its members, are NOT registered as securities broker-dealers or investment advisors either with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, CFTC, or with any other securities/regulatory authority. Consult with a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, and/or financial advisor. By reading and using this newsletter or any of my publications, you are agreeing to these terms. Any screenshots used here are courtesy of TradingView. I am just an end user with no affiliations with them. Information and quotes shared in this blog can be 100% wrong. Markets are risky and can go to 0 at any time. Furthermore, you will not share or copy any content in this blog as it is the authors' IP. By reading this blog, you accept these terms of conditions and acknowledge I am sharing this blog as my personal trading journal, nothing more.
NASDAQ:CEPLong
by quantsignals
ES Futures Trading Signal - 2025-05-25ES Futures Analysis Summary (2025-05-25) Comprehensive Summary of Each Model Grok/xAI Report Market context: Price $5,875 above 9-, 20-, 21-, 50-day MAs, just under 200-day SMA at $5,804.75; RSI ~59 neutral; price near upper Bollinger Band. Bias: Moderately Bullish, potential breakout above BB. Trade Plan: Long at 5,900; SL 5,840; TP 6,050; 1 contract; confidence 0.65. Claude/Anthropic Report Market context: Price above 20/50/200-day SMAs; RSI ~59; MACD histogram slightly negative; healthy pullback within uptrend. Bias: Moderately Bullish. Trade Plan: Long at 5,875; SL 5,825; TP 5,975; 1 contract; confidence 0.68. Llama/Meta Report Market context: Price above 20/50-day SMAs, just under 200-day SMA; RSI neutral; BB middle at 5,787.7. Bias: Moderately Bullish. Trade Plan: Long at 5,880; SL 5,810; TP 6,000; 1 contract; confidence 0.65. Gemini/Google Report Market context: Price above all key MAs (20/50/200, EMA9/21); RSI neutral; MACD lines above zero but slight bearish cross; recent 24h bounce after 5-day pullback; BB upper at 6,060.7. Bias: Moderately Bullish. Trade Plan: Long at 5,875; SL 5,845; TP 5,935; 1 contract; confidence 0.70. DeepSeek Report Market context: Same MAs and indicators, but emphasizes MACD bearish crossover, price rejection at upper BB, recent pullback. Bias: Moderately Bearish near-term. Trade Plan: Short at 5,875; SL 5,925; TP 5,800; 1 contract; confidence 0.65. Areas of Agreement and Disagreement Agreement: All models note price trading above short- and medium-term MAs. RSI ~59 (neutral, room to run). BB upper band is resistance; MACD histogram negative. Consensus that recent 5-day pullback is either consolidation (bullish view) or warning sign (bearish view). Disagreement: Directional bias: Four models bullish vs. one moderately bearish. Entry levels: range 5,875–5,900. Stop-loss zones: 5,810–5,840. Take-profit zones: 5,935–6,050. Clear Conclusion Overall Market Direction Consensus: Moderately Bullish Recommended Trade: Long ES futures Entry Range: 5,870–5,880 (target 5,875) Stop Loss: 5,845 (30-point risk) Take Profit: 5,935 (60-point reward, 2:1 R:R) Position Size: 1 contract (adjust per account risk; ~1% equity) Entry Timing: Market Open Confidence Level: 70% Key Risks and Considerations: Short-term bearish MACD crossover may lead to choppy action or minor pullback. Volatility spike at market open can cause slippage. Negative macro or news catalysts can derail technical setup. ES is highly correlated with broader equity futures; cross-asset moves may amplify moves. TRADE_DETAILS (JSON Format) { "instrument": "ES", "direction": "long", "entry_price": 5875.00, "stop_loss": 5845.00, "take_profit": 5935.00, "size": 1, "confidence": 0.70, "entry_timing": "market_open" } 📊 TRADE DETAILS 📊 🎯 Instrument: ES 📈 Direction: LONG 💰 Entry Price: 5875.0 🛑 Stop Loss: 5845.0 🎯 Take Profit: 5935.0 📊 Size: 1 💪 Confidence: 70% ⏰ Entry Timing: market_open Disclaimer: This newsletter is not trading or investment advice but for general informational purposes only. This newsletter represents my personal opinions based on proprietary research which I am sharing publicly as my personal blog. Futures, stocks, and options trading of any kind involves a lot of risk. No guarantee of any profit whatsoever is made. In fact, you may lose everything you have. So be very careful. I guarantee no profit whatsoever, You assume the entire cost and risk of any trading or investing activities you choose to undertake. You are solely responsible for making your own investment decisions. Owners/authors of this newsletter, its representatives, its principals, its moderators, and its members, are NOT registered as securities broker-dealers or investment advisors either with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, CFTC, or with any other securities/regulatory authority. Consult with a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, and/or financial advisor. By reading and using this newsletter or any of my publications, you are agreeing to these terms. Any screenshots used here are courtesy of TradingView. I am just an end user with no affiliations with them. Information and quotes shared in this blog can be 100% wrong. Markets are risky and can go to 0 at any time. Furthermore, you will not share or copy any content in this blog as it is the authors' IP. By reading this blog, you accept these terms of conditions and acknowledge I am sharing this blog as my personal trading journal, nothing more.
CME_MINI:ES1!Long
by quantsignals
1
SOL Crypto Futures Trade Plan 2025-05-26SOL Crypto Analysis Summary (2025-05-26) Model Summaries Grok/xAI Report Technical: Price $176.77 above 20/50-day MAs but below 200-day SMA. RSI 60.6 (neutral-bullish). MACD shows slight bearish divergence. Bollinger bands suggest price near upper band. Sentiment: Limited positive news impact from luxury watch integration. Neutral funding rate. View: Moderately Bullish (75% confidence). Trade: Long at $177.50, SL $171.00, TP $183.00, 50× leverage, 1% equity position. Claude/Anthropic Report Technical: Similar MA and RSI readings; below 200-day SMA. Bollinger bands point to moderate volatility. Sentiment: Balanced funding rate; positive branding news but limited price impact. View: Moderately Bullish. Confidence 72%, below threshold—no trade recommended. Llama/Meta Report Technical & Sentiment: Aligns with Grok on MAs, RSI, Bollinger. Neutral overall market backdrop. View: Moderately Bullish (80% confidence). Trade: Long at $176.77, SL $171.74, TP $186.48, 75× leverage, 0.5% equity. Gemini/Google Report Technical: Bullish on short-term MAs and RSI but MACD bearish crossover and resistance at 200-day SMA. Sentiment: Neutral funding, niche positive news. View: Moderately Bearish short term (75% confidence). Trade: Short at $176.77, SL $179.50, TP $169.00, high leverage, size 1. DeepSeek Report Technical & Sentiment: Highlights 200-day SMA resistance and MACD divergence after 18.5% monthly rally. View: Bearish (75% confidence). Trade: Short at $176.77, SL $181.00, TP $171.74, size 1. Areas of Agreement and Disagreement Agreement Price is above the 20/50-day moving averages. RSI (~60) indicates healthy, not overbought conditions. Key resistance near the 200-day SMA (~$181) and upper Bollinger Band (~$186.5). Funding rates are neutral; no extreme positioning. Luxury watch news is a mild positive but not a strong market mover. Disagreement Directional bias: Three models lean moderately bullish (Grok, Claude, Llama), two bearish (Gemini, DeepSeek). Trade triggers: Bullish models target breakouts above current price; bearish models emphasize MACD crossover and 200-day SMA rejection. Position sizing and risk thresholds vary widely (1% equity vs. 0.5% vs. full contract). Conclusion Overall Market Direction Consensus: Moderately Bullish Recommended Trade: Long SOL futures Entry Range: 177.50 (to confirm continued upside momentum) Stop Loss: 171.00 (just below 20-day SMA) Take Profit: 183.00 (near upper Bollinger Band resistance) Position Size: 1 contract (≈1% of equity at 50× leverage) Confidence Level: 73% Key Risks and Considerations: MACD bearish divergence could trigger a short-term pullback. Strong resistance at the 200-day SMA (~$181) and upper Bollinger band. Correlation with BTC/ETH and broader crypto market swings. Volatility spikes can induce slippage—strict risk management required. TRADE_DETAILS (JSON Format) { "instrument": "SOL", "direction": "long", "entry_price": 177.50, "stop_loss": 171.00, "take_profit": 183.00, "size": 1, "confidence": 0.73, "entry_timing": "market_open" } 📊 TRADE DETAILS 📊 🎯 Instrument: SOL 📈 Direction: LONG 💰 Entry Price: 177.5 🛑 Stop Loss: 171.0 🎯 Take Profit: 183.0 📊 Size: 1 💪 Confidence: 73% ⏰ Entry Timing: market_open Disclaimer: This newsletter is not trading or investment advice but for general informational purposes only. This newsletter represents my personal opinions based on proprietary research which I am sharing publicly as my personal blog. Futures, stocks, and options trading of any kind involves a lot of risk. No guarantee of any profit whatsoever is made. In fact, you may lose everything you have. So be very careful. I guarantee no profit whatsoever, You assume the entire cost and risk of any trading or investing activities you choose to undertake. You are solely responsible for making your own investment decisions. Owners/authors of this newsletter, its representatives, its principals, its moderators, and its members, are NOT registered as securities broker-dealers or investment advisors either with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, CFTC, or with any other securities/regulatory authority. Consult with a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, and/or financial advisor. By reading and using this newsletter or any of my publications, you are agreeing to these terms. Any screenshots used here are courtesy of TradingView. I am just an end user with no affiliations with them. Information and quotes shared in this blog can be 100% wrong. Markets are risky and can go to 0 at any time. Furthermore, you will not share or copy any content in this blog as it is the authors' IP. By reading this blog, you accept these terms of conditions and acknowledge I am sharing this blog as my personal trading journal, nothing more.
Long
by quantsignals
BTC Crypto Futures Trade Plan 2025-05-26BTC Crypto Analysis Summary (2025-05-26) Comprehensive Summary of Each Model Grok/xAI Report BTC at $109,553, trading above all major MAs (20/50/200 SMAs, 9/21 EMAs) → strong bullish trend RSI 67.02 (approaching overbought), MACD positive but slight bearish divergence Volume declining → possible consolidation or reduced buying interest Funding rate low (0.0002%) → not overleveraged long Trade suggested: long at $110,000, SL $107,000, TP1 $113,000, TP2 $115,000, size 1% equity, confidence 80% Claude/Anthropic Report Confirms price above all key MAs, RSI approaching overbought, MACD divergence Price near upper Bollinger Band → resistance Concludes short-term momentum weakening → moderately bearish bias Recommends no trade (confidence 72%), waits for break above $111,800 or below $105,000 Llama/Meta Report Bullish MA alignment, RSI slightly overbought, price near upper BB Funding rate neutral, sentiment generally positive Trade suggested: long on pullback to SMA20 at $105,295.59, SL $103,000, TP $110,000, size = 2–3% equity, confidence 80% Gemini/Google Report Strong bullish trend (EMA9 > EMA21 > SMA20 > SMA50 > SMA200), RSI 67, BB upper ~$111,724 MACD bearish crossover → potential short-term pullback Recommends long at ~$109,550, SL $107,700, TP $113,100, size 1 BTC, confidence 75% DeepSeek Report Price near upper Bollinger Band, MACD bearish crossover, RSI divergence Countertrend short trade: entry $109,553, SL $111,725, TP $105,295, size 1 BTC, confidence 75% Areas of Agreement and Disagreement Agreement BTC is in a strong uptrend, trading above all major moving averages RSI ~67 suggests rising momentum but nearing overbought MACD shows a bearish divergence or crossover, warning of short-term momentum loss Price is close to the upper Bollinger Band → stretched conditions Disagreement Directional bias: Grok, Llama, and Gemini bullish; Claude is cautious/no-trade; DeepSeek bearish countertrend Entry levels: ranges from pullbacks to 105k (Llama) to market price ~109.55k (Gemini/Grok) Risk appetite: varying leverage and position-sizing recommendations Trade/no-trade: Claude advises holding; others recommend active positions Conclusion and Trade Recommendation Overall Market Direction Consensus Moderately Bullish: the dominant trend is up, supported by MA structure and recent performance, despite short-term momentum warnings. Recommended Trade Direction: Long BTC futures Entry Range: Near current market (109,500–109,600) or immediate retest of EMA9 (~109,550) Stop Loss: 107,700 (below EMA9 and minor support) Take Profit: 113,100 (just above recent swing highs/upper BB) Position Size: 1 BTC (adjust per account to risk ~1–2%) Confidence Level: 78% Key Risks and Considerations Momentum Divergence: MACD bearish crossover and RSI near overbought may trigger a pullback Volatility Spikes: leverage can amplify slippage and liquidation risk Broader Crypto Moves: altcoin correlation or market-wide news can quickly shift prices Funding Rate Shifts: a sudden spike could accelerate long-side liquidations TRADE_DETAILS (JSON Format) { "instrument": "BTC", "direction": "long", "entry_price": 109550.0, "stop_loss": 107700.0, "take_profit": 113100.0, "size": 1, "confidence": 0.78, "entry_timing": "market_open" } 📊 TRADE DETAILS 📊 🎯 Instrument: BTC 📈 Direction: LONG 💰 Entry Price: 109550.0 🛑 Stop Loss: 107700.0 🎯 Take Profit: 113100.0 📊 Size: 1 💪 Confidence: 78% ⏰ Entry Timing: market_open Disclaimer: This newsletter is not trading or investment advice but for general informational purposes only. This newsletter represents my personal opinions based on proprietary research which I am sharing publicly as my personal blog. Futures, stocks, and options trading of any kind involves a lot of risk. No guarantee of any profit whatsoever is made. In fact, you may lose everything you have. So be very careful. I guarantee no profit whatsoever, You assume the entire cost and risk of any trading or investing activities you choose to undertake. You are solely responsible for making your own investment decisions. Owners/authors of this newsletter, its representatives, its principals, its moderators, and its members, are NOT registered as securities broker-dealers or investment advisors either with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, CFTC, or with any other securities/regulatory authority. Consult with a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, and/or financial advisor. By reading and using this newsletter or any of my publications, you are agreeing to these terms. Any screenshots used here are courtesy of TradingView. I am just an end user with no affiliations with them. Information and quotes shared in this blog can be 100% wrong. Markets are risky and can go to 0 at any time. Furthermore, you will not share or copy any content in this blog as it is the authors' IP. By reading this blog, you accept these terms of conditions and acknowledge I am sharing this blog as my personal trading journal, nothing more.
NYSE:XLong
by quantsignals