To the Moon: Space Isn't Just for Billionaires. It's for You TooTo your parents, getting involved in space meant joining NASA, becoming an astronaut, or — more realistically — building a scale model of the Saturn V and telling them you wanted to be "just like Neil Armstrong."
Today? You don’t need a PhD, perfect vision, or the ability to survive on dehydrated ice cream. The economics of orbit is accessible from your screen through the shares of publicly listed companies.
While billionaires are busy trying to out-flex each other in orbit, there’s a rapidly growing group of public companies that you can use as a launchpad to space exposure.
Let's explore (pun intended) how space is no longer science fiction only — it's an economic sector you can trade.
🚀 SpaceX: The Giant with a Gravitational Field
First, let’s get this out of the way: SpaceX is still private. Elon Musk’s rocket-powered unicorn dominates the headlines — and deservedly so. The company is launching Starlink satellites by the hundreds, winning NASA contracts, and discussing building cities on Mars where we can move and grow space potatoes.
But unless you have deep VC connections or you run a private equity fund, you can’t buy SpaceX stock yet. (Cue the tiny violin.) According to private-market estimates, SpaceX boasts a valuation of $350 billion, making it the world’s most expensive private company.
What you can do is invest in companies that supply, compete with, or benefit from the SpaceX era. Here are a few ideas.
🛸 Rocket Lab NASDAQ:RKLB : The Mini-SpaceX
If SpaceX is the Goliath of orbital launches, Rocket Lab is the David — except instead of a slingshot, it's using the Electron rocket and prepping the bigger Neutron.
Rocket Lab specializes in small satellite launches — think communications, Earth observation, climate monitoring. The company is cheaper, faster, and more frequent than the heavy-lifters like Falcon 9 by SpaceX. If you’re bullish on the boom in low-Earth orbit activity, Rocket Lab could be the small-cap rocket you can strap your portfolio to.
Bonus points — it’s not just a launch company. Rocket Lab, valued at around $10 billion, is expanding into satellite manufacturing, in-orbit services, and deep space missions.
👽 Intuitive Machines NASDAQ:LUNR : Houston, We Have a Moonshot
With a ticker symbol NASDAQ:LUNR — obviously leaning into the Moon theme — Intuitive is all about lunar landers and space infrastructure. The company is part of NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program, helping deliver payloads (science experiments, rovers, tech gizmos) to the Moon.
In the absence of crypto moons, these guys are aiming for the real thing.
But be warned: Intuitive is a true moonshot investment. As recently as March, the company's moon lander, Athena, couldn't pull off a stellar touchdown and its shares nosedived roughly 60%. Year to date, the stock is down 55%.
The startup is pioneering in a market that doesn’t quite exist yet at scale. Revenues are coming in phases, tied to contracts, with success as lumpy as a Moon crater. In a nutshell? It's a high-risk, high-reward kind of ride.
Still — if you're looking for an early, pure-play exposure to the Moon economy, Intuitive Machines, valued at just $1.5 billion, is basically as close as you can get.
🌟 Northrop Grumman NYSE:NOC : The Silent Space Titan
While Rocket Lab and Intuitive Machines get the Reddit buzz, Northrop Grumman keeps a low profile, winning contracts and building stuff that actually gets yeeted into space.
The company is deeply involved in NASA’s Artemis program, manufacturing boosters for the Space Launch System (SLS) — the rocket that’s supposed to return humans to the Moon. It also makes satellite systems, missile defense tech, and stealthy aerospace goodies for the US government.
Northrop isn’t going to quadruple overnight on a meme rally — it’s worth just under $70 billion. But it provides serious, steady exposure to the high-stakes space game — with dividends. It’s the choice for traders who like their moonshots with a side of mature risk management.
✨ Lockheed Martin NYSE:LMT : Space Cowboys in Business Suits
Lockheed Martin isn’t just the F-35 fighter jet company. It also builds the Orion spacecraft — NASA’s chosen ride for deep space missions, including Mars (if Elon doesn’t get there first).
Lockheed’s space division covers everything from weather satellites to missile warning systems. The company, worth around $111 billion, has been in the space race before Jeff Bezos came up with Blue Origin and way before Musk founded SpaceX.
Think of Lockheed like the expert-level astronaut: calm, collected, and still racking up mission hours while everyone else is learning which button not to press.
💫 Boeing NYSE:BA : Sometimes Up, Sometimes… Not So Much
Boeing’s Starliner capsule is supposed to ferry astronauts to the International Space Station. Supposed to. It’s been delayed more times than your average budget airline flight.
The astronauts that were stuck in space for nine months? Riding a Starliner that failed during docking (the mission was supposed to be a ten-day roundtrip). So Musk’s SpaceX had to intervene and bring those two space explorers back to earth in March.
Still, despite technical hiccups and PR headaches, Boeing remains heavily involved in the space economy. It builds rockets, satellites, and space station modules. Even when it trips, it trips forward — thanks to government contracts and industrial clout.
If you can stomach some turbulence, Boeing, worth $134 billion, offers another angle on the space trade.
🌙 RTX NYSE:RTX : Watching the Skies
You may not think "space" when you hear RTX (formerly Raytheon), but you should. The company builds sensors, satellites, and missile tracking systems — vital components of the US space and defense apparatus.
Space isn’t just about launching astronauts and rovers; it's about surveillance, communications, and security. RTX, valued at a whopping $168 billion, plays behind the scenes, helping make space a battlefield for signals, not soldiers.
Steady, profitable, and sneakily important, RTX is the stealth bomber of space stocks.
🪐 Other Orbit-Worthy Notables
Outside of the headliners, there’s a growing constellation of companies playing critical roles in space commerce:
Redwire NYSE:RDW : In-space manufacturing and tech solutions.
Blacksky Technology NYSE:BKSY : Real-time satellite imagery and analytics.
Virgin Galactic NYSE:SPCE : Richard Branson’s waning dream of space tourism, working to make suborbital flights a regular experience (careful, though, the stock is down 99.9% from peak).
☄️ Your Portfolio Doesn't Have to Stay on Earth
Space is no longer just a billionaire’s playground or a sci-fi dream. It's an investable theme — one that covers exploration, infrastructure, defense, data, and connectivity.
Sure, the sector is volatile. There will be delays, explosions (hopefully unmanned), stock swings, and moments where it all seems like an expensive science experiment. But there’s also real innovation, massive contracts, and a trillion-dollar economy forming right above our heads.
The thing is, while the biggest names in tech make the headlines and get daily coverage , you won’t see those space companies featured on the front page of big financial journals or covered in the weekly take of your financial podcast.
Traders who are serious about catching the big moves before they blast off should keep one tool close: the earnings calendar . These companies’ quarterly reports highlight progress, revenue, profit or loss figures, and present forward-looking guidance to act as a compass to traders and investors.
The economics of space isn’t just exciting because it’s shiny and futuristic — it’s exciting because the groundwork is being laid quietly, deal by deal, launch by launch. And the traders who are paying attention before the crowd shows up? They’re the ones best positioned for lift-off.
Your turn : Are you already investing in the space economy? Did we miss any names in there? Tell us — what’s your favorite way to reach for the stars? ✨🚀🌔
SPIUSD trade ideas
Big Tech Lines Up for Earnings Season: What Traders Should KnowPeak earnings season is right around the corner — the next two weeks are for the geeks with tech giants slated to report their quarterly financials all the while traders and investors weigh concerns over tariffs, trade wars, and export controls.
On tap to offload first-quarter earnings updates this week are Tesla NASDAQ:TSLA (Tuesday) and Google parent Alphabet NASDAQ:GOOGL (Thursday).
We’ll get more of the tech elite next week — Meta NASDAQ:META and Microsoft NASDAQ:MSFT deliver next Wednesday and Amazon NASDAQ:AMZN and Apple NASDAQ:AAPL report Thursday. Nvidia NASDAQ:NVDA reports late in May.
Let’s talk about that.
Welcome to earnings season, aka that rush hour of the quarter when traders hit refresh on the earnings calendar , their watchlists, and cortisol levels.
Once again, it's Big Tech in the spotlight — specifically the Magnificent Seven club, a pack of tech heavy hitters who spent the past year building the future of artificial intelligence only to be the first out the door this year when investors dumped risk in the face of looming global uncertainty.
Now, with Tesla and Alphabet kicking off what could be a market-moving series of updates, the real question isn’t just who beat the numbers — but who can still tell a good story in the face of tariffs, competition, and AI-fueled capex that’s starting to look like Monopoly money.
👜 The Setup: Seven Stocks, Seven Bags to Hold
The Magnificent Seven — Tesla, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet, and Nvidia — aren’t just the tech elite. They’ve been the main engine of the market for the last few years. But in 2025, the wheels have come off.
These technology mainstays, towering over the growth sector, have shed hundreds of billions and are now nursing double-digit percentage losses. Each. One. Of. Them. The growth space, valued more on prospects of bright performance rather than current showing, has been hit hard this year. How hard? That hard:
Tesla NASDAQ:TSLA is down 36%
Nvidia NASDAQ:NVDA is down 27%
Amazon NASDAQ:AMZN is down 21%
Alphabet NASDAQ:GOOGL is down 20%
Apple NASDAQ:AAPL is down 19%
Meta NASDAQ:META is down 16%
Microsoft NASDAQ:MSFT is down 12%
On the outside, we all know what’s dragging stocks — it’s the widespread tariff jitters fanning recession fears and triggering waves of capital outflows. But on the inside, these tech giants are deep into a spending spree, and paring back that guidance might be too late.
AI spending is now at fever pitch, having gone from “impressive” to “uh… should we be concerned?” And that’s what investors will be watching when these masters of technology report quarterly numbers.
Besides the usual revenue figures, earnings per share and (likely timid) guidance, capital expenditures will draw a ton of attention. Capital expenditures, or capex, is the amount of money a company allocates for investments in new stuff like hardware and software and that may include beefing up existing infrastructure.
Injecting AI into systems and operations is top focus right now and Big Tech has decided to be generous and pony up some big money for it. Here’s what this year’s capex looks like, as per prior guidance:
Microsoft has allocated $80 billion
Alphabet has set aside $75 billion
Amazon? $100 billion ready to roll
Zuck’s Meta is in with up to $65 billion
The rest of the Mag 7 haven’t put out official capex projections but no one is sleeping on the opportunity.
Let’s go around the room and see what each of these is dealing with right now.
🚗 Tesla: A Look Under the Hood
Tesla reports first, and traders are bracing for either redemption — or another reason to panic sell.
On the surface, it’s not pretty: EV demand is sagging, especially in China and Europe. Musk’s political disruption and proximity to Trump aren’t helping the optics. And with shares already down 36% this year, the company enters this earnings call with bruises and baggage.
Revenue is expected to come in at $21.2 billion, down 1%, while earnings are projected to drop 8% to $0.42. Tesla delivered 336,681 cars in Q4 , a 14% drop from the same time a year ago.
🌎 Alphabet: Quiet Strength, But Still on Watch
Alphabet is expected to deliver solid results — $89.2 billion in revenue, up 11%, and $2.01 in earnings per share, up 6.3% from last year. Among the Mag 7, it’s one of the best-positioned players to weather trade volatility, thanks to its size, diverse revenue streams, and sheer dominance in advertising and cloud computing.
Its Gemini AI model is heating up the race against ChatGPT and Copilot, and its cloud division is quietly chipping away at AWS and Azure’s lead.
That said, traders will still be watching for any signs of slowdown in digital ad spending—a canary in the coal mine if the economy starts to sputter under tariffs and tightening global conditions.
💻 Amazon and Apple: The Slow Burners
Amazon, with its big-ticket spending on AI, is playing the long game — mostly through AWS, the company’s main driver of profitability. It's aggressive, even by Big Tech standards. The problem? AWS margins are under pressure, and retail is facing the squeeze from cautious consumers.
Amazon needs to prove it can turn AI into revenue, not just headlines. Amazon’s sales and earnings per share are projected to grow 8.16% and 38.7% respectively.
Apple, meanwhile, is in the risky position of relying a bit too much on China for its products — it ships about 90% of its iPhone from Asia’s biggest economy.
And while that may be irrelevant for first-quarter results, it may weigh on the company’s outlook, considering Trump’s flip-flopping on Chinese tariffs (is tech in or is tech out?) .
The iPhone maker is expected to report $93.9 billion in revenue and $1.61 in earnings per share.
🔍 Meta and Microsoft: AI Darlings With Something to Prove
Meta reports next Wednesday, and the pressure’s on. Zuck has gone full steam into AI, pushing for everything from AI chatbots in WhatsApp to personalized content generation across Facebook and Instagram.
But here’s the kicker: Meta still makes its money from ads. And if ad budgets start shrinking in response to tariffs or a slower economy, AI investments may not save the day — at least not right away.
Meta is expected to pull in $41.3 billion in revenue and $5.24 in earnings per share.
Microsoft, on the other hand, has positioned itself as the white-collar AI whisperer. Copilot is everywhere — Office, Teams, Edge, Windows — and its $80 billion in AI infrastructure spending is squarely aimed at enterprise dominance.
It still holds a 49% stake in OpenAI, and Azure is growing, albeit slower than expected. If Microsoft can show AI adoption translating into real revenue, traders may get the breakout they’ve been waiting for.
Microsoft is expected to pick up revenue of $68.5 billion and $3.23 in earnings per share.
🤖 Nvidia: The Final Boss
Nvidia won’t report until late May, but it’s already looming over the entire earnings season. Every other tech company is spending billions on Nvidia’s chips — so when the chipmaker finally updates investors, it could swing sentiment across the entire sector.
The market wants to see that demand is real and growing, especially from hyperscalers like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google. If Nvidia disappoints, the fallout might be like watching a domino go down.
Nvidia is expected to bring home $43.1 billion in revenue and $0.90 in earnings per share.
⚙️ Final Thoughts: Big Bets, Big Risks
This isn’t just another earnings season — it’s a stress test for the Magnificent Seven amid times of big market shifts. The group that once carried the market now faces a reality check: AI is expensive, global trade is messy, and Wall Street is no longer giving out free passes for “vision.”
But where there’s risk, there’s also opportunity. Traders who can sift through the noise, spot the change in tone, and ride the next narrative — whether it’s autonomous Teslas, AI-powered spreadsheets, or ad-supported Metaverse avatars — will have the edge.
What’s your take? Which Big Tech name are you watching most closely — and are you betting on a rebound or bracing for more pain? Let’s hear it from you.
S&P 500 Rally Exhausted? Watch This Level for the Next Drop!The S&P 500 Index( SP:SPX ) has finally touched the Resistance zone($5,680-$5,500) as I expected in my previous post .
The S&P 500 Index is moving near the Resistance zone($5,680-$5,500) , the Resistance line, and Yearly Pivot Point .
Also, we can see the Regular Divergence(RD-) between Consecutive Peaks .
In terms of Elliott Wave theory , it seems that the S&P 500 Index is completing the Zigzag Correction(ABC/5-3-5) , and if the uptrend line breaks , we can confirm the end of the Zigzag correction .
When the S&P 500 Index started to rise on April 22 , Bitcoin also started to rise at the same time , so a decline in the S&P 500 Index can cause Bitcoin ( BINANCE:BTCUSDT ) to decline .
I expect the S&P 500 Index to drop to at least $5,313 AFTER breaking the uptrend line .
Note: If the S&P 500 Index touches $5,712, we can expect more pumps.
Please respect each other's ideas and express them politely if you agree or disagree.
S&P 500 Index Analyze (SPX500USD),2-hour time frame.
Be sure to follow the updated ideas.
Do not forget to put a Stop loss for your positions (For every position you want to open).
Please follow your strategy and updates; this is just my Idea, and I will gladly see your ideas in this post.
Please do not forget the ✅' like '✅ button 🙏😊 & Share it with your friends; thanks, and Trade safe.
S&P500 - The bottom we have been waiting for!The S&P500 - TVC:SPX - officially created the bottom:
(click chart above to see the in depth analysis👆🏻)
This month we officially saw one of the craziest stock market fakeouts of the past decade. With a drop and reversal rally of about +15%, the S&P500 is about to even close with a green monthly candle, which then indicates that the stock market bottom was created.
Levels to watch: $120, $250
Keep your long term vision!
Philip (BasicTrading)
PIVOTAL DAY AHEAD FOR $SPX: Will We Reclaim the Highs or Begin tTechnical Breakdown: We’re at a critical junction for the S&P 500. After completing a 5-wave structure, SP:SPX is teetering near a decision point. Two potential paths are now unfolding:
Bullish Scenario (🟢):
A daily close above 5386 would invalidate the current bear thesis.
This opens the door to a push toward the 90–100% Fib retracement zone (5685–5750).
Short-term traders may look to ride the momentum if 5485 is broken cleanly.
Bearish Scenario (🔴):
A rejection at current levels, coupled with a close below 5386 and a gap-fill back down, confirms the bearish triangle setup.
If this plays out, we’re targeting a drop to the 4600–4400 range based on the 1.618 and 2.618 Fibonacci extensions and broken trendline dynamics.
This aligns with the Elliott Wave breakdown (W5 peak, now in corrective ABC structure).
🧩 Macro Context:
High inflows to safe havens like gold suggest rising fear.
Volatility is elevated, and liquidity is thinning post-earnings season.
💥 Conclusion: Tomorrow’s close is not just another candle – it’s a potential macro trigger. Either we confirm a final leg higher in this cycle, or the bearish wave unfolds in full.
⏳ Watch 5386 closely.
Could The Stock Market Crash? - WARNING 🚨MartyBoots here , I have been trading for 17 years and sharing my thoughts on SPX .🚨
🚨 SP:SPX Could It Crash?🚨
Lets look into it deeper, very interesting chart but also a dangerous one. Need to see buyers soon or this is could be worse than people expect. 5-10% drop minimum and extreme bear could drop 40% total🚨
Watch video for more details
SP500 US500 update 21.04.2025 My vision until the end of AprilIf someone thinks that the bear market in the US indices has arrived, I want to show you a monthly chart that shows that the trend is still long. We got a reaction of the 0.5 Fibonacci zone. But we entered the monthly accumulation with a gradual test of the Last Structure FVG.
At this timeframe, the price has already broken the ascending structure, which means that in order to regain its ascending status, the structure needs to invert the weekly FVG, in other words, to consolidate above the 5554 level.
So far, there are no long positions, but if we look at the monthly FVG target test, we can try to find short positions when the price reaches 5554 and does not consolidate above this level
1. Trump’s Economic Vision in 2025
Introduced a 10% baseline global tariff starting April 5, 2025.
Over 25% tariffs were imposed on key trade partners like China and Mexico.
Objectives: reduce the $887B trade deficit, combat currency manipulation, and strengthen domestic industry.
Domestically, Trump extended the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (risking a EUROTLX:4T budget deficit over 10 years) and prioritized deregulation, particularly in fossil fuels.
2. Trump’s Relationship with the Federal Reserve
Resurfaces criticism of Fed Chair Jerome Powell, calling for interest rate cuts.
Pushed a Supreme Court case challenging the Fed’s independence, aiming to give the President authority to remove the Fed Chair.
Analysts warn this threatens central bank credibility, potentially raising long-term inflation expectations.
3. Impact of Tariffs on Economic Stability
Long-term GDP projected to fall by 6%; wages by 5% (Wharton Model).
Households face up to $5,200 in additional annual costs due to price increases.
Investment and exports decline; EU exports could drop 8% to 66%.
While benefiting sectors like steel, tariffs risk broader job losses in supply-chain industries.
4. Federal Reserve’s Challenges
The Fed navigates inflationary pressure while maintaining economic stability.
Only one rate cut expected in 2025 despite political pressure.
Tariffs complicate monetary policy by fueling external inflation and supply disruptions.
5. S&P 500 and Market Outlook
S&P 500 dropped 7% after new tariffs were announced (stagflation fears).
Despite past growth during Trump’s first term (+68%), current policies increase volatility.
Risks include reduced capital inflow, weakened Fed independence, and ongoing global retaliation.
✅ Conclusion
Donald Trump’s 2025 economic strategy hinges on aggressive tariffs and pressure on the Federal Reserve to lower rates. While intended to stimulate domestic growth, these moves contribute to inflation, challenge institutional independence, and heighten market volatility. For investors and policymakers, the path forward demands careful navigation of an economic environment shaped by protectionism, policy conflict, and fragile monetary stability.
So far, everything does not look good. I am waiting for the approval of the BTC reserve for May (next month). This could positively affect the American economy in the SHORT TERM.
Best regards, EXCAVO
_____________________
Disclosure: I am part of Trade Nation's Influencer program and receive a monthly fee for using their TradingView charts in my analysis.
S&P500 Long and painful but necessary bottom formation.The S&P500 index (SPX) has been trading within a 2-year Bullish Megaphone pattern and the recent 2-month correction completed its latest Bearish Leg, as it reached the Higher Lows trend-line.
The massive rebound that took place there on April 07 may have turned out to be a highly volatile one but as mentioned on the title, it might be long and painful, but a necessary process nonetheless. That's mainly because it is the strongest correction since 2022 and the longest Bearish Leg of the pattern.
The market remains highly volatile until it gets a clear signal, bearish below the current Support of the 1W MA200 (red trend-line) or bullish above the 1D MA50 (blue trend-line). Despite the rather short-term uncertainty, the similarities with the Megaphone's previous bottom are uncanny, both having formed their Low on 1D RSI Double Bottom patterns.
Given that this previous Low initiated a massive +50% 1 year Bullish Leg/ rally, we expect to see at least 7100 on this next one by mid-2026.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
** Please LIKE 👍, FOLLOW ✅, SHARE 🙌 and COMMENT ✍ if you enjoy this idea! Also share your ideas and charts in the comments section below! This is best way to keep it relevant, support us, keep the content here free and allow the idea to reach as many people as possible. **
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure: I am part of Trade Nation's Influencer program and receive a monthly fee for using their TradingView charts in my analysis.
💸💸💸💸💸💸
👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇
Built Up Swing Short Bet Over the Last Day.Got another good chunk of the rally taking our net SPX long earnings to over 20% for the year on low risk (For context, our max DD is about 1/4 of what SPX is down this year).
I still would prefer to see 5800 for me to take a real big swing at the short (because I know at 5800 even if I am wrong I'll generally get some reaction to size down a bit in risk) but we may undershoot that.
I've build up my position around the 5400 sort of area. Small tolerance for stop zones. If I am wrong, I think 5800 would hit really quickly.
Update to below idea.
S&P 500 - Sell in May, return anther day. The truth - 2025No doubt everyone has heard a variation of the phrase:
“Sell in May, return another day.”
In Wikipedia it is written:
“Sell in May and go away is an investment strategy for stocks based on a theory (sometimes known as the Halloween indicator) that the period from November to April inclusive has significantly stronger stock market growth on average than the other months. In such strategies, stock holdings are sold or minimised at about the start of May and the proceeds held in cash”
A public comment from last year:
“Over 100 years ago, the (practical) reason to sell in May and September, was to pay seasonal workers to seed the field (May) and to harvest (September). Caravans of landlords and farm owners went to New York to sell stocks and withdrew money from the banks to do payrolls
so for people without agricultural business, i'll say it's okay to hold in May”
If we are to take all this at face value then we should be unwinding our long term positions until the Autumn?
What does the chart say?
On the above monthly chart of the S&P 500 each vertical line marks the month of May going back to 2012. That is a dataset of 13 points.
The facts:
1) From the month of May onwards, 11 from 13 periods returned positive price action of not less than 10%. Selling in May was a bad choice.
2) 2015 and 2022 saw corrections of 15% from May onwards. However in both examples the correction was erased within 12 months as the index continued the uptrend.
In summary, 86% of the time a minimum return of 10% was seen before the year end. Amazing odds.
Furthermore, corrections up and until the end of April (like we’re now seeing) represented some of the best long opportunities.
Sell in May go away? I suggest it should be: Buy in June and watch it boom!
Ww
$SPX Bull/Bear Line in the Sand – Fireworks Ahead?The S&P 500 ( SP:SPX ) is sitting just below a clear resistance level—a true bull/bear line in the sand.
On the one hand, bulls are eyeing a potential breakout into the weekend that could ignite a short squeeze or continuation rally. 🎆 On the other, Deutsche Bank, the last of the major bulls, has thrown in the towel—cutting their year-end target from 7,000 to 6,150 amid economic concerns.
This is where things get interesting. If we break above this resistance with volume, expect upside momentum. If not… this could be the start of a deeper rollover.
👉 Watch that overhead line closely. It's the fuse. 💣
🟢 Breakout = bull party
🔴 Rejection = potential for bearish reversal
5800 Would le Optimal for a Bear SetupThe market is fast and ATR is high so I make sure I have plans to both sides so as not to be caught out, but realistically I've done hardly any trading since the day we dropped 6% and the rallied to retest the high. That was the last day I took big positions (longs which hit trailing stops for 300 points) and since then I've been mainly watching.
Spectating rather than speculating. There are times to make money and times to lose it, it's good to know the difference between them.
In a simple bear trend, we could see a high here somewhere in the 5200 - 5300 range - but to best suit the things I expect to see in a good bull trap before a real drop, I'd like to 5800.
SPX at 5800 would convince me to start trying to trade big positions short again.
Another move down for SPX500USD?Hi traders,
SPX500USD made a bigger orange X-wave last week into the Daily FVG.
So next week we could see the start of the last impulse wave down to finish the bigger (red) WXY correction. But it first has to close below the Daily FVG.
Let's see what the market does and react.
Trade idea: Wait for a change in orderflow to bearish, a small impulse wave down and a small correction up on a lower timeframe to trade shorts.
If you want to learn more about trading FVG's & liquidity sweeps with Wave analysis, then please make sure to follow me.
This shared post is only my point of view on what could be the next move in this pair based on my technical analysis.
Don't be emotional, just trade your plan!
Eduwave
S&P500 Long then Short: Last Wave 5 of 5In this video, I updated the wave counts for S&P500 and expects a last wave 5 of 5 (thus the long). I uses 2 Fibonacci extensions to project the final target and chose the lower of the target as the TP.
Once the target is reached, then we look for a reversal signal before entering short. The target of the short will be the end of sub-wave 4 as illustrated.
Good luck!
Is This a Massive AB=CD? I first joined this site under the "HoleyProfit" username in 2021 to give my warnings of potential bear markets. Obvious bear setups forming in the meme mania and I also though this would extend into the indices given a bit of time.
I was a bit early on the indices but over the following months all the tops were made and the drops came to pass.
Late 2022 I began to pivot back to bull when there was signs of bear trend failure and by early 2023 I was fully in the bull camp.
At the time I started to talk about a blow off top move. One which was exactly similar in size and style as the 2021 rally but the angle of the rally for a bit sharper.
This would have predicted a parabolic run to somewhere around 6000 - which has since come to pass.
Read the original post below.
If my thesis that we were heading into a giant D leg was correct, then that would mean we have a top made.
And we'd enter into super ugly market conditions over the coming months.
Déjà Vu: 2025 Tariffs Mirror 2018 Trade War PlaybookThe economic strategy behind the new wave of tariffs bears an unmistakable resemblance to the 2018–2020 U.S.–China trade conflict. That’s no coincidence. Peter Navarro, the architect of the 2018 tariff playbook under President Trump, has once again stepped into a key role shaping trade policy in Trump’s second term.
In 2018, the Trump administration launched a phased escalation of tariffs, starting with targeted duties on Chinese imports and expanding into broader measures that disrupted global supply chains. By Q4 2018, the S&P 500 had fallen nearly 20%, while tech-heavy names like NVIDIA plunged over 50% amid valuation compression, supply chain fears, and geopolitical stress.
Peter Navarro’s re-emergence signals that this isn’t just about political posturing. Known for his hardline stance on China and focus on economic nationalism, Navarro treats tariffs not as negotiation tools but as long-term policy. In 2018, that posture drove escalation until the market forced a pause.
Now in 2025, we’re watching the same script unfold almost beat for beat:
1. Start with China
2. Expand globally
3. Soften the global rhetoric to isolate China
4. Target key sectors (semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, energy)
5. Start the media misdirection to work behind the scenes with China
6. Set up a “deal” under market pressure
In 2025, the market again entered bear territory but staged a brief recovery after a pause in reciprocal tariffs. As of April 21, 2025, the index sits 16% off its February high and still in a downtrend.
Now, looking at the charts, here where things begin to take shape. Let’s start with the 2018 chart (figure 1). Like previously mentioned, back in 2018, the S&P 500 dropped over 20% between September and December, finding the bottom at a key support from 20 months prior (Q1 2017). The first gray box represents 10 weeks from the 2018 high. The 10 weeks is important because we are currently 10 weeks off the 2025 high, so this first gray box shows historically where we are today relative to the 2018 prices. The second gray box represents the 3 remaining weeks of drawdown, which was roughly 10%.
Figure 1
Now looking at the 2025 chart (figure 2), we have the same 10-week gray box marked up, and the additional 3-week, 10% drawdown, gray box that follows. Coincidentally, or not, the bottom of the second gray box aligns almost perfectly with the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement from the 2022 swing low to the 2025 high (figure 3). Even more interesting, that support level also ties back to the September 2023 high—roughly 20 months prior. Sound familiar?
Figure 2
Figure 3
I will be watching that 4500 level for SPX over the next few weeks as Trump and Navarro are preparing to roll out more sector-specific tariffs in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, Jerome Powell is facing renewed pressure, including calls to step down—again, nearly identical to the rhetoric from late 2018.
Currently, markets are pricing in just a 10% chance of a rate cut, according to Kalshi. But if the market continues to slide, Navarro and Trump may dial up pressure on the Fed to act. A rate cut in early May could mark the market bottom—just like Powell’s dovish pivot did in early 2019.
If the 2018 blueprint holds, we’re in the middle innings. Tariffs are broadening, the market is reacting, and the Fed is being boxed in. The coming weeks may test the 0.618 Fib level on the S&P 500. If Powell pivots and rhetoric softens, we may find a low—and history will have rhymed, if not outright repeated. If Powell stays strong, then Trump and Navarro may publicly pull back and take negotiations behind closed doors.
I don’t see this is being just being coincidental. This seems to be following a very familiar playbook.
S&P 500 Rockets Past Resistance-Is 5,728 Next?The S&P 500 (SPX) formed a double bottom pattern on Monday, April 7, and Wednesday, April 9, on the 4-hour timeframe, signaling a potential reversal from recent lows. Later on April 9, the index broke above resistance, confirming short-term bullish momentum. On April 24, the 20-period moving average crossed above the 50-period moving average, reinforcing the strength of the emerging uptrend. By April 25, a 4-hour candle closed above the 200-period moving average, providing further confirmation of a strong bullish trend. That same day, the SPX broke through the significant resistance level at 5,501, with a candle closing above this level, which supports the view of continued upward movement. Based on my technical setup, the next potential target is projected at 5,728.
S&P 500 Analysis Ahead of the Busiest Week of Earnings SeasonS&P 500 Chart Analysis Ahead of the Busiest Week of Earnings Season
Despite the fact that President Trump’s earlier decision to impose tariffs (at higher rates than expected) shook the stock markets, the S&P 500 index (US SPX 500 mini on FXOpen) could still end April without significant losses (currently trading less than 2% below the month’s opening level) or even achieve a positive result.
According to media reports, around 180 S&P 500 companies are expected to release their quarterly earnings this week, including Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), Coca-Cola (KO), Eli Lilly (LLY), Meta (META), Microsoft (MSFT), and Chevron (CVX).
The share prices of these major companies — some of the largest by market capitalisation — could have a substantial impact on the S&P 500 index chart (US SPX 500 mini on FXOpen), given that their combined weight accounts for approximately a quarter of the index calculation.
Technical Analysis of the S&P 500 Chart
Based on the key price actions marked on the chart, we can identify a descending trend channel for the US stock market, which has been in effect since mid-February.
At the same time, the price has:
→ moved into the upper half of this channel, reaching its upper boundary;
→ found support around the median line (as evidenced by the price action on 21 April).
These are bullish signs, reinforced by the aggressive nature of the rebound from the psychological 5,000-point level, which acted as significant support in the first few days following the tariff announcement. Bears may still see an attractive opportunity to attempt to resume the downward momentum of the S&P 500 index (US SPX 500 mini on FXOpen), but will the fundamental backdrop support such a move?
From an optimistic perspective, sharp impulses driven by corporate news could lead to a breakout above the upper boundary of the red channel. This would likely be facilitated by important announcements (particularly from senior officials in the US, China, and Europe) regarding de-escalation of the tariff situation.
This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.
What Is the Advance-Decline (A/D) Line, and How Can You Use ItWhat Is the Advance-Decline (A/D) Line, and How Can You Use It in Trading?
The Advance-Decline (A/D) Line is a widely used market breadth indicator that provides insights into the strength of trends by tracking advancing and declining stocks. Popular among traders analysing indices like the NASDAQ, it helps identify broad participation or hidden divergences. This article explores how this indicator works and its role in effective market analysis.
What Is the Advance-Decline Line?
The Advance-Decline (A/D) line, also known as the Advance-Decline Index, is a popular market breadth indicator used to gauge the overall health of a market's movement. Instead of focusing solely on price changes in an index, it analyses how many stocks are participating in the market's rise or fall. This makes it particularly useful for traders looking to understand whether a trend is supported by widespread participation or driven by just a handful of stocks.
The indicator can be set up based on stocks on different exchanges. For example, a NYSE Advance-Decline line provides insights into NYSE-listed stocks. However, it can be applied to any index or exchange, resulting in the Nasdaq Advance-Decline line or a line based on stocks listed in the UK, Australia, Europe, or Japan.
At its core, the A/D line is a cumulative measure of the net advances of stocks on a given day. The calculation is as follows:
1. Count the number of advancing stocks (those that closed higher than their previous close).
2. Count the number of declining stocks (those that closed lower than their previous close).
3. Subtract the number of declining stocks from the advancing stocks to get the net advance.
4. Add this net advance to the previous day’s A/D line value.
Formally, the Advance-Decline line formula is:
Net Advances = Advancing Stocks − Declining Stocks
Current A/D Line Value = Previous A/D Line Value + Net Advances
For example, if 500 stocks advanced and 300 declined on a given day, the net advance would be +200. If yesterday’s A/D Line value was 10,000, today’s value would be 10,200. Over time, these daily values form a line that tracks the cumulative net advances.
The indicator provides insights into sentiment. A rising line indicates more advancing stocks than declining ones, while a falling line suggests the opposite. Traders often use this data to determine whether a price trend in an index reflects broad strength or is being carried by a few heavyweights.
Understanding Market Breadth
Market breadth measures the extent to which individual assets are contributing to a market's overall movement, providing a clearer picture of the strength or weakness behind trends. Rather than relying solely on an index's price performance, breadth gives traders insights into how widespread participation is within a rally or decline. This information is crucial for understanding whether market moves are broad-based or concentrated in a few influential assets.
A market with a strong breadth typically sees most stocks or assets moving in the same direction as the overall trend. For example, during a rally, broad participation—where a large percentage of assets are advancing—signals a robust and healthy trend. Conversely, weak breadth occurs when only a small group of assets drives the movement, potentially indicating fragility in the trend. This is especially important in large indices where a few heavily weighted assets can mask underlying weaknesses.
How Traders Use the A/D Line
The A/D Line is more than just a market breadth indicator—it’s a practical tool traders use to gain insight into the strength and sustainability of trends. By analysing how the indicator behaves in relation to price movements, traders can uncover potential hidden opportunities and spot potential risks. Let’s consider how the Advance-Decline line behaves on a price chart.
Identifying Trend Strength
One of the A/D Line’s key uses is evaluating the strength of a market move by examining overall participation. When both the A/D Line and an index rise together, it suggests widespread buying activity, with most stocks contributing to the rally. Similarly, if both the index and the A/D Line decline, it often reflects broad-based selling, indicating that weakness is widespread across the market rather than concentrated in a few assets.
Spotting Divergences
Divergences between the A/D line and price are closely watched by traders. For instance, if an index continues to rise but the A/D line starts declining, it could signal that the trend is losing momentum. Conversely, when it begins rising ahead of a price recovery, it may suggest underlying strength before it becomes apparent in price action.
Complementing Other Indicators
Traders often pair the A/D line with other tools to refine their analysis. For example, combining it with moving averages or oscillators like RSI can help confirm signals or highlight discrepancies. A rising A/D line alongside RSI rising above 50 might reinforce the possibility of a price rise.
Strengths of the A/D Line
The A/D line is a widely respected tool for understanding market dynamics, offering insights that price-based analysis alone can’t provide. Its ability to measure participation across a broad range makes it especially valuable for traders looking to assess sentiment and trend reliability. Let’s explore some of its key strengths.
Broad Market Perspective
The A/D line captures the performance of all advancing and declining stocks within an index, offering a comprehensive view of how much support a trend has. Instead of focusing solely on a handful of large caps that often dominate indices, the indicator reveals whether the majority are moving in the same direction. This helps traders gauge the true strength of a rally or decline.
Early Warnings of Weakness or Strength
Divergences between the A/D line and the price can act as an early signal of potential changes in momentum. When the A/D Line deviates from the overall trend, it can highlight areas where market participation is inconsistent. This allows traders to assess whether a trend is gaining or losing support across a broad range of assets, offering clues about potential shifts before they fully materialise in price action.
Applicability Across Markets
Another strength is its versatility. The A/D line can be applied to indices, sectors, or even individual markets, making it useful across various trading strategies. Whether monitoring a broad index like the S&P 500 or a specific sector, the indicator can be adapted to provide valuable insights.
Limitations of the A/D Line
While the A/D line is a useful tool for analysing breadth, it isn’t without its limitations. Traders need to understand its drawbacks to use it effectively and avoid potential misinterpretations. Here are some of the key challenges to consider.
Ignores Stock Weighting
One major limitation is that the A/D index gives equal weight to every stock, regardless of size or market capitalisation. In indices like the S&P 500, where a small number of large-cap stocks often drive performance, this can create a disconnect. For example, a large-cap stock’s strong performance might lift an index while the indicator shows weakness due to low-caps underperforming.
Vulnerability to Noise
The index can produce misleading signals in certain conditions, such as during periods of low trading volume or heightened volatility. Market anomalies, such as large fluctuations in a small number of stocks, can skew the indicator and make it less reliable. This can be especially problematic in thinly traded assets or at times of high speculation.
Not a Standalone Indicator
The A/D line is combined with other tools. On its own, it doesn’t account for factors like momentum, valuation, or sentiment, which can provide critical context. Traders relying solely on it may miss out on key details or overemphasise its signals.
Comparing the A/D Line with Other Market Breadth Indicators
The A/D Line is a powerful tool, but it’s not the only market breadth indicator traders use. By understanding how it compares to other indicators, traders can select the one that suits their analysis needs or combine them for a more comprehensive view.
A/D Line vs Advance-Decline Ratio
The A/D Ratio measures the proportion of advancing to declining stocks. While the A/D line provides a cumulative value over time, the ratio offers a snapshot of market breadth for a single trading day. The A/D Ratio is often better for identifying short-term overbought or oversold conditions, whereas the A/D line excels at tracking long-term trends.
A/D Line vs McClellan Oscillator
The McClellan Oscillator uses the same advancing and declining stock data but applies exponential moving averages to calculate its value. This approach makes the McClellan Oscillator more sensitive to recent market changes, allowing it to highlight turning points more quickly than the A/D line. However, the A/D line’s simplicity and cumulative nature make it more straightforward to interpret for broader trend analysis.
A/D Line vs Percentage of Stocks Above Moving Averages
This indicator tracks the percentage of stocks trading above specific moving averages, such as the 50-day or 200-day. While the A/D line focuses on daily advances and declines, the moving average approach highlights whether stocks are maintaining longer-term momentum. The A/D line provides a broader perspective on participation, whereas this indicator zeros in on sustained trends.
The Bottom Line
The Advance-Decline line is a valuable tool for traders seeking deeper insights into market trends. By analysing market breadth, it helps identify potential opportunities and risks beyond price movements alone.
FAQ
What Is the Meaning of Advance-Decline?
Advance-decline refers to the difference between the number of advancing stocks (those that closed higher) and declining stocks (those that closed lower) on a specific trading day. It’s commonly used in market breadth indicators like the NYSE Advance-Decline line to measure the overall strength or weakness of the market.
How to Find Advance-Decline Ratio?
The Advance-Decline ratio compares advancing stocks to declining stocks in an index. It is calculated by dividing the number of advancing stocks by the number of declining stocks.
How to Use an Advance-Decline Line Indicator?
The A/D line indicator tracks the cumulative difference between advancing and declining stocks. Traders analyse its movement alongside price trends to assess market participation. For example, divergence between the A/D line and an index price direction can signal potential changes in momentum.
What Is the Advance-Decline Indicator Strategy?
Traders use the Advance-Decline indicator to analyse market breadth, identify divergences, and confirm trends. For example, a rising A/D line with an index suggests broad participation, while divergence may signal weakening trends.
This article represents the opinion of the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand only. It is not to be construed as an offer, solicitation, or recommendation with respect to products and services provided by the Companies operating under the FXOpen brand, nor is it to be considered financial advice.
SPX500 I Bearish Drop Based on the H4 chart analysis, we can see that the price has just reacted off our sell entry at 5522,70, which is an overlap resistance.
Our take profit will be at 5371.29, an overlap support level.
The stop loss will be placed at 5685.38, which is an overlap resistance level.
High Risk Investment Warning
Trading Forex/CFDs on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. Leverage can work against you.
Stratos Markets Limited (tradu.com):
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 63% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Stratos Europe Ltd (tradu.com):
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 63% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Stratos Global LLC (tradu.com):
Losses can exceed deposits.
Please be advised that the information presented on TradingView is provided to Tradu (‘Company’, ‘we’) by a third-party provider (‘TFA Global Pte Ltd’). Please be reminded that you are solely responsible for the trading decisions on your account. There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Any information and/or content is intended entirely for research, educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment or consultation advice or investment strategy. The information is not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person and therefore does not involve a consideration of any of the investment objectives, financial situation or needs of any viewer that may receive it. Kindly also note that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking or past performance statements. We assume no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information and/or content provided herein and the Company cannot be held responsible for any omission, mistake nor for any loss or damage including without limitation to any loss of profit which may arise from reliance on any information supplied by TFA Global Pte Ltd.
The speaker(s) is neither an employee, agent nor representative of Tradu and is therefore acting independently. The opinions given are their own, constitute general market commentary, and do not constitute the opinion or advice of Tradu or any form of personal or investment advice. Tradu neither endorses nor guarantees offerings of third-party speakers, nor is Tradu responsible for the content, veracity or opinions of third-party speakers, presenters or participants.
Hellena | SPX500 (4H): LONG to resistance area of 5682.Colleagues, I think that the deep downward movement is over and at the moment I expect an upward movement in a five-wave impulse. At the moment I expect a correction in wave “2” to the area of 5100, after which I expect the development of wave “3” at least to the resistance area of 5682.
There are two possible ways to enter the position:
1) Market entry
2) Pending Limit Orders.
Manage your capital correctly and competently! Only enter trades based on reliable patterns!
Major shift on the S&P 500: Is the bull market really over ?
After three years of almost uninterrupted gains, the U.S. market has finally shifted gears.
In early March, following a sharp escalation in trade tensions between China and the United States, the S&P 500 officially entered a bear market.
The tariff shock acted as a catalyst: buyers failed to defend critical levels, and the bullish momentum broke down.
Today, my scenario is clear:
I believe we are entering a wide range similar to what we saw in 2022, between 4700 and 5500 points.
In this controlled volatility environment, both investing and trading strategies must adapt.
💰 For long-term investing:
I'm staying fully in cash.
I prefer to wait until my personal indicator flashes green again before re-entering the market.
Patience is my best weapon in uncertain environments.
🎯 For swing trading:
The approach here is more active.
Each touch of the lower boundary (around 4700) will be considered a tactical buy, aiming to resell around 5500 points at the top of the range.
No rushing, no chasing moves: I only act at the extremes.